Petition for quashing proceedings under IPC 1860 sections 147, 148, 337 and 324. Court held full trial required due to grievous injuries sustained. Presence of accused dispensed with, representation by counsel mandated.
Criminal petition disposed of; personal presence of petitioners waived, representation by counsel mandated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3303 ]
rNrHE HrGH couRrfs$rtff^tJiJE oF TELANGANA
r uE s D AY rl[1 3 iR8 ti 3 ii,?'- i'r P'=#"-
PRESENT
THEHONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEJ SREENIVAS RAO
Between:
AND
PetitionunderSection52SofBNSS,prayingthatinthe.circumstances statedin the Memorandumof cro-uJ" of cri*in"r'peiition,the High court may be pleased to callfor the entire ,"*Jt i"fating to SC No' 40 of ZOZ+on the file of Dist, andquash the same in the Learnedsenior civil Judge,vkala[uo,-vit "irbad interestof justice'
l.A. NO:3 OF 2025
Petition underSection 528 of BNSS,prayingthat-.in th.e, circumstances statedin the Memorandumof crounJsof criminar'pelition,the High court may be pleased to stayall further pro"""iing; in SC No' 40 of 2024' on the file of Learned
i \ I I
Senior Civil Ju<j interest;l;r"ril:ne'vikarabad' vikarabad District, penrling quash petition, in the
This petit.
fl"-Ttr ;'r,.#,iHX,?J'"lT lill'fl;,,i1,i,1,,the Memorandum or Adoitionar ;;il:1,:L",n,';f::ir:,li':?'#",:,,,,n,u,t.Ii sri M'HJ appeared ro,. n.rpondent no.2. ' behalr o; ;""I"JJ:;,,H, T,T, ::*i:li
The Court made the following: ORDER
r-,
IN THE HIGH COURT F'OR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICB-J.SREENIVAS RAO
of
Date:02.12.2025
Between
Imroz Khan and five others
...petitioner
AND
The State of Telangana, through its Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad and another.
...respondents
Order
This criminal Petition is filed seeking to quash the
proceedings in S.C.No.40 of 2024, on the file of the learned Senior
Civil Judge, Vikarabad, vikarabad District, wherein the petitioners
were arrayed as accused Nos.3 to 8, for the offence punishable under
section 147, 148. 3a7 and 324 rlw 149 of the Indian penal code, 1860.
Mr.Mohd.Adnan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Jitendar
a I i II I
,.)
Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent No. I /State.
::3::
j.,iflS.ffi ,,...'.Y :, ', I
\
4
I
(:
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, stand
closed
SD/. P PONNA KRISHNA, ASSISTANT REGISTRAR.
//TRUE COPY/
o
SECTION OFFICER
To
pr
\
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0211212025
ORDER
S
()
it i 0i[ 2025
':t
CRLP.No.15813 of 2025
DISPOSING OF THECRL.PETITION
0
1 issue framed by the court
Whether criminal proceedings against accused sustaining simple injuries should be quashed as abuse of process of law.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Imroz Khan
The State of Telangana
Justice J Sreenivas Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
