Giduturi Nagamani v. The state of Telangana
Case brief
What is this about?
Crl.P.No.14546 of 2025 (Telangana HC, Tirumala Devi Eada J., 10-11-2025): quashment petition under S.528 BNSS concerning D.V.C.No.8 of 2025 (PWDVA 2005, S.9(b) and S.37(2)(c)) pending before III Additional Magistrate of First Class, Kothagudem, against Accused Nos.2 to 4 (Giduturi family members); scope narrowed to dispensation from personal attendance; attendance excused unless specifically required during trial, conditional on counsel representing petitioners at every hearing; petition disposed of without quashing; miscellaneous applications closed; Respondent No.2 (complainant) absent; no precedent cited; single-author order, no dissent.
What did the court decide?
Attendance of petitioners/Accused Nos.2 to 4 before the trial Court in D.V.C.No.8 of 2025 dispensed with, unless their presence is specifically required during the course of trial, provided they are represented by their counsel on every date of hearing; miscellaneous pending petitions ordered closed.