Accused challenged a docket order dismissing their application to recall PWs 1 to 3 for further cross-examination, which was dismissed without hearing. The High Court directed the trial Magistrate to decide the recall petition afresh on merits after hearing both parties and disposed of the criminal petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
CRIMINAL PETITIO NO: 14189 OF 2025
Between:
...PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS/A.1 TO A.3
AND
...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT
...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER/COMPLAINANT
Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Quash the docket order passed in Crl. M.P.No.204 of 2025 in CC No.1149 of 2018 on the file of the I Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Jagtial dt2910812025 by allowing the petition filed u/s 311 of Cr.P.C. for further cross examination of PWs- 1 to 3 in CC No.1149 of 2018
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in CC No.1 149 of 2018 pending on the file of the I Additional Judicial [Magistrate of First Class at Jagtial dt 2910812A25 pending disposal of the main Criminal Petition
{ ,t
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri BALA MURALI Y, Advocate for the petitioners and SRl. JITHENDER RAO VEERAMALLA, Additionar pubric prosecutor on beharf of the Respondent No.1 & 2
The Court made the foilowing: ORDER
\ \
\ \
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
CRIMINAL PETITION No.14189 of 2025
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSS') by the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 3 seeking to quash the order dated 29.08.2025 passed in Crl.M.P.No.204 of 2025 in C.C.No.1149 of 2O1B on the file of I Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Jagtial.
was dismissed due to non-representation on the stipulated date,
and that it was not heard on merits
as under:
*41 to A3 absent, no representation. Cr. M. P. N o. 204/202 5 is dismissed"
R
2
B. with the above direction, this criminal petition is disposed
of.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand
closed.
SD/. T.SRINIVASA REDDY STANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
D. Hyderabad [OUT] 5. Two CD CopiesTwo CD Copies
VM/PSL
J
\
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0311112025
ORDER CRLP.No.14189 of 2025
:\ "i:.iii- l.:;.ri
t:
1G r.I ler t Iilfr
'r( /.1'-r.. .:-r.r.ir"'-'
DISPOSING THE CRIMINALPETITION
€
<br>
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a docket order dismissing a Section 311 Cr.P.C. recall petition for non-representation without hearing both parties could stand.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Thipparthi Rajinikanth
Thipparthi Bhulaxmi
Thipparthi Hanmandlu
The State of Telangana, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana
The Station House Officer, Jagtial Police Station
Tirumala Devi Eada
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
