Disposed¶28

Smt. Padakanti Munni Begum, v. State of Telangana

Telangana HC3 Sept 2025CRLP/10946/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CRLP No. 10946 of 2025, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad (K. Sujana J.), 03-09-2025 - Smt. Padakanti Munni Begum v. State of Telangana & Anr.: anticipatory bail petition under Section 482 BNSS in Cr.No.439/2025 (Sadasivpet PS, Sangareddy); disposed of on recording the Additional Public Prosecutor's submission at the petitioner's request; no bail direction issued; miscellaneous petitions, if any, closed.

What did the court decide?

None; the petition was disposed of upon recording the learned Additional Public Prosecutor's submission, with no direction for enlargement on bail; miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ¶28

Smt. Padakanti Munni Begum, Vs State of Telangana — Anticipatory Bail | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³³⁸⁵ ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TEI-ANGANA AT HYDERhBAD

¶3

WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD PAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND ANO TWENW FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA

¶6

c M NAL PETITION N 1 025

¶7

Between:

¶8

Smt. Padakanti Munni Begum,, Wio. Late Padakanti Mustafa, Aged 50 years, Occ. Housewife, Rl/o. H.No. 1-87, Bhu$areddipalle Village, Babul-gaon, Medak Dist. Presently residing Sadasivpet Toyn and Sangareddy Districf

¶9

...Petitioner/Accused No.2

¶10

AND

¶11

1 State of Telangana,, through S.H.O. Dummugudem Police Station, rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad

¶12

XXXX, D/o. XXXX(XX Aged 21 years, Occ. Housework Rl/o. H. No.15-146/1 , lslampur, Hanuman Nagar, Siddipet, Siddipet Dist.

¶13

...Respondents/Complainant

¶14

Petition under Section 482 of BNSp praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, $e High Court may be pleased to direct the S-H.O. Sadasivpet {o enlarge the Petitipner/Accused No. 2 on bail in the event of her arrest in Crimp No.439 of 2025,'dt. '18-08-2025 on the file of Police Station Sadasivpet, Sairgareddy district, in the interest of justice.

¶15

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and fpon hearing the arguments of Sri Palle Srihari Nath, Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri D.Arun Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor on behaf Jf the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the-Respondent No.2.

¶16

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶17

THE HONOURABLE SMT WSTICE K. SIJJANA

¶18

CRIMINAL PETITION No.l 0946 of 2O25

¶19

ORDER:

¶20

This criminal petition is filed by the pe itioner under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (tor short tsNSSJ for grant of anticipatory bail in ,:onnection with Cr.No.439 of 2O2S of Sadasivpet police Statirrn, Sangareddy District.

¶21

Heard Sri Palle Srihari Nath, learned c.or rnsel for the petitioner and Sri D.Arun Kumar, learned Acld tional public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent_State. .

¶22

¶23

a The contention of learned counsel for the pet tioner is that petitioner herein is the mother of accussd No.1 and apprehending arrest as the complainant in hcr complaint mentioned as family members. Hence, requested to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶24

The learned Additional public prosecutor would submit that petitioner herein is not arrayr:d as accused a td there are no allegations against this petitioner, as such, there rs no threat of her arrest

¶25

¶26

¶27

Having regard to the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, learnqd counsel for the petitioner requests this Court to record the submission of learned Additional Public Prosecutor, and to close this petition.

¶28