Dismissed¶¶46

Mudumbha Gopi Chandra Bose, v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC10 Jan 2025CRLA/29/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court, CRLA/Criminal Appeal No. 29 of 2025, decided 10-01-2025 by K. Surender, J. Mudumbha Gopi Chandra Bose (appellant/complainant) v. State of Telangana and Sarika Veera Bhadram (respondent No. 2/accused). Appeal under Section 419 BNSS against judgment dated 09-10-2024 in STC.Nl.No.64B of 2022 (X Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Ranga Reddy District at Kukatpally). Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh appeal after necessary corrections; miscellaneous petitions closed. Withdrawal of criminal appeal; no ruling on merits; no precedent engaged.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh appeal after making necessary corrections; miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the appeal were directed to stand closed. ¶¶46

Mudumbha Gopi Chandra Bose, Vs The State of Telangana — Telangana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶5

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 29 OF 2025

¶6

Appeal under Section 419 of BNSS against the Judgment dated 09-10-2024 made in STC.Nl.No.64B of 2022 on the file of the Court of the X Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Ranga Reddy District at Kukatpally.

¶7

Between:

¶8

Mudumbha Gopi Chandra Bose, S/o. Narasimhacharyulu, Age 43^years, Occ. Private Employee, R/o. Khammam Town, Khammam District, currently at H.No.5-4-58, Flat No.202, [\4y Home Vaddepally Apartments, Kukatpally, Ranga Reddy District, Hyder abad-7 2

¶9

...Appellant / Complainant

¶10

AND

¶11

'l . The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad

¶12

...Respondent No 1 / Respondent No 1

¶13

Sarika Veera Bhadram, S/o. Hussain, Age 44^years, R/o. H.No.1-4-49lG1, Opp New Lorry Office, Bypass Road, Saradhi Nagar, FCI Godown Road, Khammam, Khammam District5O7003

¶14

...Respondent No 2 / Accused

¶15

Counsel for the Appellant Sri Shaik Madar

¶16

Counsel for the Respondent No 1

¶17

The Additional Public Prosecutor

¶18

The Court delivered the following Judgment :

¶19

¶20

¶21

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶22

CRIMINAL APPEAL No.29 OF 2025

¶23

JUDGMENT:

¶24

Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permisr;ion of this Court to u,ithdraw the appeal with the libert_r' to file fresh appeal alter making necessary corrections.

¶25