Dismissed¶30

M/s Swarna Bharathi, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Telangana HC24 Jan 2025CRLA/237/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court (K. Surender, J.) dismissed Criminal Appeal No. 237 of 2011 on 24-01-2025 for non-prosecution: counsel without instructions, appellant uncontactable. Appeal lay under Section 11, A.P. Protection of Depositors of Financial Establishments Act and Rules 1999 against Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad order dated 14-12-2010 in Crl.MP.No.60/2009 in Crl.MP.No.864/2005 in Crime No.918/2005. No issues decided, no precedents cited, no quantum; of no precedential value on merits.

What did the court decide?

As learned counsel for the appellant had no instructions to prosecute the appeal and could not contact the appellant, the criminal appeal is dismissed. ¶30

M/s Swarna Bharathi, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh — Telangana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[32511

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

FRIDAY HE TWENry FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FME

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶6

CRIMINAL APPEAL No: 237 of 2011

¶7

Appeal under section i 1 of A. p. protection of Depositors of Financiar Establishments Act and Rures 1999, against the order dated 14-12-2010 passed in crl.MP,No-60 of 2009 in crr.Mp.No.864 of 2005 in crime No.918 of 2005 on the file of the Court of the Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad.

¶8

Between:

¶9

2.0!1 !!1: .syqTg_elarathi, (56).cREDtr under^MMAC_ A p^Sociery rvtutuaity^Ltd., nioeo^Regd., 6oiOp.^with soil"tiJi No. AMC/ hJ HYD(U) rsi# MACS_^";;;l; g[,:".3j,.1yJ:193r lpza, shop No B,rhiro rrooiSanx sireet,'ii^{jti'n'vi'"'iidJi'} Kep. Dy rrs urrector /^president V.K. Vijay Kumar, S/o V.R.Kannan, Age:-59 years.

¶10

...AppellanUThird Party

¶11

AND

¶12

1 . The State of Andhra Pradesh, P.S., C.C.S., Detective Department, Hyderabad.

¶13

smt. U. Susheera Devi, wo u-chinna Venkateshwar Rao. Aoe:s4 vears. Occ: Business, R/o Ftat No.105. Sai Virat npirtments, fi;il-lG;;r:iie; Malakpet, Hyderabad.

¶14

Smt. D.Padmaja, W/o D.surendernath, Age:31 years, R/o Flat No.105. Viiava. Kaghavendra Apartments. Saleemnagar, Hyderibad.

¶15

U. Chinna Venkateshwar Rao, S/o Late Venkata Swamy, Age:65 years, occ:Rtd, R/o Ftat No 105, Sai Virat Apartme;ts;'A;aril^{'Xrigir,'N.rr;} Malakpet, Hyderabad.

¶16

5 !r U Chakrapani. S/o U.Chinna Venkateswara Rao. Aoe:39 vears Occ:tsusiness. R/o Flat No. 105, Sai Virat Apartments, An'and-Nagarj New Malakpet, Hyderabad.

¶17

6.V.9 Kishore Kumar, S/o U.Chinna Venkateswara Rao. Aoe:36 vears.

¶18

Occ:Eusiness, R/o Flat No.105, Sai Virat Rpartrnenti, nnlnaifagir,'Ne; Malakpet, Hyderabad.

¶19

...Respondents/Respondents/Accused^.l to 5

¶20

(Respondents No.5 & 6 are not necessary party to this Appeal)

¶21

Counsel^{for the Arcpellant: M/s. K' Anoop Kumar} Counsel for^{the R'rspondent No'1: Sri M' Vivekananda Reddy} Assistant Public^Prosecutor

¶22

The Gourt deliver':d^{the following: JUOGMENT}

I I I

I I I i i

THE HONOURABLE SRI JuSTICE K.SUR.ENDER CRIIT{INAL APPEAL No.237 of2OLL

¶28

JUDGM ENT:

¶29

Learned counsel appearing for the appellant would submit that he had no instructions from the appellant to prosecute the appeal. Though efforts were made to contact the appellant, he did not come in contact.

¶30

In view of the above submissions made by the learned counsel for the appellant, this crirninal appeal is dismissed. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand

¶31

closed.

¶32

//TRUE COPY//

¶33

Sd/- K. SAILESHI D U REGISTRAR CTION OFFICER

¶34

To,

¶35

¶36

The Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad.(with records, if any) + 2. Two ccs to the Pubric prosecutor, High court for the state of ierangana^€ at Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶37