State appeal against acquittal of A-2 and A-3 was dismissed because the appellant failed to serve personal notices on the respondents as directed by the Court in 2017, and filed no proof of service or dispatch of notices.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3453 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL APPEAL N o: 1351 of 2017
Appeal under Section 378(3) & ('l) of Cr.p.C against the Judgment dated 07-07-2017 passed in S.C.No.440 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Additional lvletropolitan sessions Judge for Trial of communal offence casescum-Vll Additional lvletropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad.
Between:
The state of relangana, rep. by The public prosecutor, High court at Hyderabad.
...Appella nUCom pla ina nt
AND
(A-1 is not necessary party)
...Respondents/Accused
Counsel for the Appellant: Sri Arun Kumar Dodla, Additional Public Prosecutor
Counsel for the Respondent: None Appeared
The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT
.\
I
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 135I oF 20t7
JUDGMENT:(per The Hon'ble Sri Justice K.SURENDER)
0 t
This appeal is filed by the State aggrieved b1.the acquittal of respondents/A2 & A3 recorded by the Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge for Tnal of Communal Offence Cases-cum_Vll Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, in SC.No.44O of 2O11, dated 07 -O7 .2O17 .
2
service nor proof of sending the notices are filed, Criminal Appeal
is dismissed.
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/. I. NAGA LAKSHMI DEP TY REGISTRAR
To,
TION OFFICER
kam %
I
,
HIGH COURT
DATED:06102t2025
JUDGMENT
CRLA.No.1351 of 2017
4{: E s 14
i
)
Og AP R
o
I
+t
" ti--l .t",
\ " :t
*;: -:-
DISMISSING OF THE CRIMINAL APPEAL ob y>
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the State's appeal against acquittal should be entertained when notices to the respondents were never served despite court direction?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The State of Telangana, rep. by The Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad
Syed Omer Shameem
Vinod Kumar Sahu
K.Surender
E.V.Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
