Contempt case alleging violation of a writ order granting liberty to seek land regularization under GO.Ms.No.59. The Tahsildar's counter showed the application was considered and rejected by endorsement dated 09.08.2024. Finding no violation, the court closed the contempt case with liberty to challenge the endorsement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3168 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TEI.ANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 764 OF 2025
Contempt Case filed Under Sections 10 to 12 of Contemptof Courts Act,1971 to punish the respondents herein for deliberate, violation and willful disobedienceof the Orders of the High Court dated16.07 .2024passed in W.P. No. 18639 ot 2024-
Between:
Gundu Pedda Bhudevi, W/o. Late GunduLingaiahAged about 68 YearsOcc. Agriculture R/o. H No. 1-11111, Bargaon P Mopal Mandal,Nizamabad District
...PETITIONER
AND
..,RESPONDENTS
lA NO: 2 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the cir umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court mil bepleased pleased topermit thepetitioner to amend the cause title ie., responcr nt no.2 as Anupama Wo Not known aged about 41 years, Occ: TPO Ther izamabad Municipal Corporation Rep by its commissioner Division No.5 Bargaor ) Village Nizamabad Nizamabad District.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI AMBEDKAR DUNNA
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR ASSIGNMENT
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICEIC LAKSIIMAN
CONTEMPT CASE No.764of 2025
ORDER:
None appears for the Petitioner.
2
KL, J C C.No.764 of 2025
submitted by the petitioner seeking regu i rization was considered and rejected. He has filed a co1. pf the said endorsement dated 09.08.2024 along wilh the counter affidavit. Even then, the petitioner did not I le any reply adverting to the same
Sd/- MOHD ISMAIL : EPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
SS/BA 'e,
HIGH COURT
DATED:1 1lO7l2O25
ORDER
-4
T:
,/'oo{'
' )-<br>r)
oo ,lfl 20?s
I
ao
t
+
s I 6
GC.No.764 of 2025
CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE Jrs Lal2-letc
1 issue framed by the court
Was there willful and deliberate violation by the respondents of the writ order dated 16.07.2024 directing consideration of the petitioner's regularization application?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Gundu Pedda Bhudevi
K. Rameshwar
Anupama
Srinivas Raju
Srikanth
Swapna
K. Lakshman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
