Contempt court was condused regarding the non-compliance of a previous High Court order. The party involved confirmed that the prior order was duly complied with, and the contempt case was closed.
The contempt case is closed without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
132s21
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
CONTEMPT
i 3232 0F 2025
Contempt Case filed Under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of CourtsAct, 1971 to punish the respondents herein violating and disobeying the directions ofthe High Court dated 17 10.2025 passed in W P.No.29513 ot 2024.
Between:
lVl,Navneeth Chowdary, S/o tt/.Agastya Raju, Aged about 25years,Occ: Student R/o Flat No. 203, Sri Sai Residency, MallikarjunanagarNorth, Chintalkunta, L.B Nagar, Rangareddy District.
...PetitionerMrit Petitioner
AND
...Respondents
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M NAVNEETH CHOWDARY (PARTY lN PERSON)
Counsel for the Respondents: -
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
DATED: 24.t2.2O25
Betwet-'n:
Sri M.ltlavneeth Chowdary petitioner And
Dr.V.Ram Chandram and Others ,.Respondents
ORDEtli
2
,A SD/- P. CH. NAGABHUSHAMBA DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII C SECTION OFFICER
To,
I
I I I
HIGH COUR''I'
DATED: 2411212025
ORDER
CC.No.3232 o12025
f4.
'[HE.S
t
,Ja. i 't i';'r illzfi
*
'l/;.i'
nz'
'-'-:-)'
CLOSING THE, CONTEMPT CASE
WITHOUT COSTS
2,1
,.:..+
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M. Navneeth Chowdary
Dr. V. Ram Chandram
Dr. L.P Raj Kumar
Dr. N Sudarshan
SUREPALLI NANDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
