Vijay Gopal v. Sri S. Goverdhan Reddy
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt of Courts Act 1971 Sections 10 to 12; Telangana High Court Hyderabad; CC.No.2878 of 2025; willful non-compliance; W.P. No.32164 of 2024 order dated 02.04.2025; paragraph No.13 observations; Rule 6(b); Rule 6; Rule 10; service of notice in advance; respondent's counsel acceptance with proof and additional affidavit; extra set of writ petition copies with covers; processing fee; subsequent covers; Rule Nisi forms; optional compliances; Registry insisting; Registrar General S. Goverdhan Reddy; Registrar Judicial-I J Jeevan Kumar; Vijay Gopal advocate party-in-person; contempt disposed without punishment; petitioner permitted to approach 2nd respondent to scrutinize and ensure compliance; no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions closed.
What did the court decide?
No punitive action taken; the petitioner (party-in-person) was permitted to approach the 2nd respondent (Registrar Judicial-I), who is to scrutinize the matter and take appropriate steps to ensure adherence to and compliance with the paragraph No.13 observations of the order dated 02.04.2025 in W.P. No.32164 of 2024; no order as to costs; miscellaneous pending petitions, if any, stand closed.