In this contempt case, the petitioner alleged violation of an order directing the respondent school to permit the petitioner's son to repeat Class IX. The court noted that the respondent complied with the order. The case was closed with no order as to costs.
Contempt case closed with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
132s21
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2730 OF 2024
Petition under Sections 10 to'12 of Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondent for willful disobedience of the orders dated 19-09-2024 passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP No. 16845 o't 2024.
Between:
Patlavath Shanker, S/o Hanuma, aged about 45 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. H.No. 4511, Peddathanda Ramunuthala Villege, Konapoor Amangal, Mahabubnagar District - 509358.
...PETITIONER
AND
The Principal, The Hyderabad Public School Begumpet, Hyderabad-SO0O16
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Petitioner :SRl RAMA KRISHNA KULKARNI
Counsel for the Respondent: SRI A.P. SURESH RAM
The Court made the following: ORDER
-ry
HON'BLE MRS JUSTICESUREPALLI NANDA
CONTE MPT CASENo.273O OF 2024
ORDE R:
Heard Sri Rama KrishnaKulakarni,learned counsel appearing onbehalf of the petitionerand Sri A,P. Suresh Ram, learnedcounsel appearing on behalf of respondent.
'6. Taking into considerationthe request made by the learned counselappearingon behalf of thepetitioner andduly considering the averments made atpara No.7 of the counter affidavit filed onbehalf ofthe respondent No.6(referred toand extracted above). Thepetitioner isdirected to approach the resPondents with a representation seekingpermissionto permit the petitioner's son torepeat Class IX to enable thepetitioner's son to perform better
sN.j 2 cc 2730 2024
and meet the promotion criteria for his current academic year within aperiod of one (01) week from the date ofreceipt of copy of the order and upon thepetitioner's approaching the respondents hereinwith the said representation, and upon receipt of the same by the respondents, the respondents are directed to consider the said representation in accordance to lawon humanitarian grounds, as averred atpara No.7 of the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent No.6(referred to and extracted above) and take a decision in the matter within a period of one(O1) week thereafter and duly communicate the decision to the petitioner".
l
(
cc 21302024
.,)
no order as tocosts.
Miscellaneouspetitions, ifany, pending shallstand
closed.
sd/- B. SATYAVATHI D U REGISTRAR
,/TRUECOPY'I
E TIONOFFICER
To
12 one o"" cc CCto to SRIA SRr RAMAKR|:,IlHiff:1ffi),:ffit"si" P SUREStoPucl 3 Two CDCoPies
AR/gh
o
/
,
i I t, I I ! :
HIGH COURT
DATED:24101t2025
ORDER
CC.No.2730 of 2024
.:\r
-.t
,,i
(q
r i.)
ri) 2 E iiAB Z16 "s
* i {,
C,r t'ATcl\ gO
CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE WITHOUT COSTS.
1<br>
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent willfully disobeyed the order directing the petitioner's son to repeat Class IX.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Patlavath Shanker
The Principal, The Hyderabad Public School Begumpet
Surepalli Nanda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
