K.Vishwadeep Vs Shri Manoj Ahuja, IAS — Contempt of Court | Telangana HC (2025)

K.Vishwadeep Vs Shri Manoj Ahuja, IAS — Contempt of Court | Telangana HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Contempt Case No.175 of 2025 closed after recording compliance by respondent No.1 (fresh marks memo issued and delivered to petitioner's counsel) and the petitioner's concession; miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, ordered to stand closed.

Issue for consideration

Whether the respondents committed contempt of court by willfully not implementing and not honouring the order dated 22-07-2024 passed in W.P.No. 4291 of 2024. +1 more

Ratio / Principle

Standing Counsel for respondent No.1 submitted that, in compliance with the Court's order dated 13.03.2025, respondent No.1 issued a fresh marks memo and gave it to the petitioner's counsel, whereby the order dated 22.07.2024 in W.P.No.4291 of 2024 stands complied with.

Key takeaways

The learned counsel for the petitioner fairly conceded with the version of the learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.1 regarding the compliance effected.ratio¶29
Recording the submissions of compliance and the petitioner's concession, the Court closed the Contempt Case.ratio¶30

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Contempt Case No.175 of 2025, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad (Justice C.V. Bhaskar Reddy), order dated 10-04-2025: Filed under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act by K. Vishwadeep (a minor student, through his father) against the Chairperson of the Central Board of Secondary Education and three Kendriya Vidyalaya officials, alleging wilful non-implementation and non-honouring of the order dated 22-07-2024 passed in W.P.No.4291 of 2024. The Standing Counsel for respondent No.1 reported that, in compliance with the Court's further order dated 13.03.2025, respondent No.1 had issued a fresh marks memo and delivered it to the petitioner's counsel, so the order of 22.07.2024 stood complied with; counsel for the petitioner fairly conceded. Recording these submissions, the Court CLOSED the Contempt Case and directed that miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. No precedent cases were cited or engaged with.

[^32s6 ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAO

THURSDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR^REDDY

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 175OF 2025

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts^{Act, to punishthe} respondents for willfully, rntentionally committing^{contempt of courtby not} implementing and not honouring the Hon'ble^{Court Ordersdaled22-07-2024} passed in W.P.No. 4291 of 2024.

Between

K.Vishwadeep, S/o. Korba Thukaram, Aged^{aboutOcc.Student,17 years,} Being minor rep.by his father Sri Korba^{Thukaram, S/o.K.Gangaiah, 58 years'} Occ. Govt. Teacher, R/o.H No.2-61l3A,^{Shakkarnagar,Achanpally,Bodhan,} Nizamabad District

...pETrroNER

AND

Shri Manoj Ahuja, lAS, Chair Person,^{The Central Boardof Secondary} Education Shiksha Kendra, Community^{Centre,PreethVihar,Delhi-1 10092}

Smt Nidhi Pandey, Commissioner.^{Kendriya Vidyalaya SangathanNo,1B,} lnstitutional Area, Sahidjeet Singh Marg, New Delhi.

Shri Dr D. manjunath, Deputy Commissioner,^{Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan} Hyderabad Region, Picket, Secunderabad,^{Hyderabad District.}

Shri B.Venkateshwara Rao, Principal,^{Kendriya Vidhyalaya Bellal Farm} Village Bodhan Mandal Nizamabad District.

...CONTEMN.RS

Counsel for the Petitioner :SRl G.R.S.AKHILESWAR

Counsel for the Respondent No.1^: SMT.ANNAPURNA^{SREERAM(SC FOR} cBSC)

Counsel for the Respondent No.2 to 4: SRI^{AJAY KUMAR(SC)}

The Court made the following: ORDER

I

,

/

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY

CONTEMPT CASE No.175 of2O25

ORDER:

This contempt case is filed alleging violation of the order dated.22.O7.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No.4291 of 2024.

Smt.Annapurna Sreeram, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent No. 1 submits that in conrpliance with the order dated 13.03.2025 passed by this Court, respondent No.1 has issued fresh marks memo and the said m:rrks memo of the petitioner was also given to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and, therefore, the order daLed 22.07.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No.429 1 of 2021, has been complied with.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner fairly conceded with the version ol the learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent No. 1 .

1S 4 Recording the said submission, this Contempt Case closed

2

Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending in this writ

petition shall stand closed.

SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL DEPUTY REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

4>-

SECTION OFFICER

To,

One CC to SRI G.R.S. AKHILESWAR, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Onetc to SMT. ANNAPURNA SREERAM, SC FOR CBSC [OPUC] 3.^'One CC to SRI K. AJAY KUMAR, Advocate IOPUCI

Two CD Copies.

AR/gh ?+

HIGH COURT

DATED:1010412025

ORDER

CC.No.175 ot 2025

iac s IA I(
(r,
(
6
ooJ
3 0 JUN 2$6
t
orl SP ^TCP.--

CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE.

?n-
3 6 >C