Appeal against a trial court judgment and decree; the appellant, party-in-person, remained unrepresented on multiple listings despite the matter being posted for dismissal. The High Court held the appellant had lost interest and dismissed the appeal suit for default with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ts2171
I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA . ATHYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N,TUKARAMJI
APPEAL SUIT NO: 371 OF 2007
Appeal filed under Section 96 of C.P.C. against the Judgment and Decree dated 24.07.2006 passed in O.S.No.56 of 1999 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge at, ltr'lahabubabad, Warangal District.
Between:
Chiliveru Sreramulu, S/o lt/adaru, Occ: Driver, R/o H.No.2-3-6112, Ivlahabubabad, Warangal District.
...Appel lanUDefenda nt
AND
Macharla Ramesh, S/o Shankaraiah, Occ: Business R/o Mahabubabad Village and mandal, Warangal Dist
...RespondenUPlai ntiff
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2007(ASMP. NO: 1360 OF 20071
Petition under Section'1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Judgment and decree in OS NO.56/1999 dated 2410712006 on the file of the Senior Civil Judqe, [\4ahabubabad during the pendency of this Appeal.
Counsel for the Appellant: Sri Chiliveru Sreramulu, Party in Person (Not
Present)
Counsel for the Respondent : Sri V. Ravi Kiran Rao
The Court delivered the following:
14- '-2-L: ., 2- a
I l
THE HONOURABLESRIJUSTICEN. TUKARAMJI
APPEAL SUITNo.371OF2007
JUDGMENT:
Thepresent appeal suit is filedby the appellant aggrieved by thejudgment and decree dated24'07'2006passed in O'S' No'56 of 1999on the file of the learned SeniorCivil Judgeat l\Iahabubabad,WarangalDistrict'
ti
2
As a sequel, miscellaneous applicationspending, if any, shall
stand closed.
SD/-I.NAGALAKSHMI DEPUTY REGISTRAR
ITRUE COPY//
--=-=7
ECTION OFFICER
To,
DL/PSL
Yr
HIGH COURT
DATED:1210212025
i i .- J ,t
,. ( --i(
J
z
t) 3ti APT 2025
\i.
I
I ('
\ -::
JUDGMENT
AS.No.371 of 2007
APPEAL SUIT IS DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT"
G-c4
Yt
tt\ae
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal should be dismissed for default due to the appellant's continued non-representation and loss of interest in the cause.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Chiliveru Sreramulu
Macharla Ramesh
N. Tukaramji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
