Petitioner company filed writ petition challenging deduction of permit fees from work bills. Court permitted withdrawal of the writ petition and dismissed the same.
Permission accorded to withdraw the writ petition. Petition dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 ]
HIGH COURTFORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial OriginalJurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRIJUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO:9930 oF 2024
Between:
M/s. BSR Constructions,Rep, by its lvlanagingPartner, Mr.B sanjeev fgooy'sl9, ii;;;;''#;i;;il 66 Vi., ir.iir".l,-t--g+IanaratnNasar' Siddipetrownand District
.....PETITIONER
AND
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition UnderArticle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filedtherewith'the High Court may be pleasedtoissueawritofMandamus,oranyotherappropriatewrit'orderor direction,declaringtheactionoftherespondentsincontemplatingtodeduct permit fee stipulatedunder G O Ms No' 21 dated 31-03-2022 from the bills
payable to the petitioner company in relation to the works being executed by the petitioner company vide Nos.1) Agreement No. 121-22 dated 06-08-2021, 2) Agreement No. 121-22 dated 06-08-2021, 3) Agreemenl No. 121-22 dated 06-082021 , 4) Agreement No. 122-23 dated 24-08-2022, 5) Agreement No. ,'23-24 dated 29-08-2023,6) Agreement No. 123-24 dated 29-08-2023, 7) Agreement No. /2324 dated 29-08-2023,8) Agreement No. 123-24 dated 04-12-2023, 9) Agreement No. 123-24 daled 04-12-2023, 10) Agreement No /23-24 daled 04-12-2023, 11) Agreement No. 123-24 dated 07-06-2023under respondents as illegal, arbitrary and contrary the terms and conditions of the respective agreements, and further direct the respondents not to deduct any amounts titled as Permit F:ee vide GO Ivls.21 dated 31-03-2022 from the Bills payable to the petitioner cornpany by the respondents under the respective agreements.
|.A.NO:1 OF 2024
Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim directions restraining the Respondents from making any deductions towards purported Permit Fee from Running Bills arising out execution of work pursuant to the Agreements vide Nos.1)AgreementNo. t21-22 dated 06-08-2021, 2) Agreement No. 121-22 dated 06-08-2021, 3) Agreement No. t21-22 dated 0608-2021 ,4) Agreement No. /22-23 dated 24-08-2022, 5) Agreement. No. 123-24 dated 29-08-2023, 6) Agreement No. /23-24 dated 29-08-2023, 7) Agreement No. /23-24 dated 29-08-2023,8) Agreement Xo :LZ-Z+ dated 04-12-2023, 9) Agreement No. 123-24 daled 04-12-2023,'10) Agreement No. i23-24 Ctated 04-122023,11) Agreement No. 123-24 dated 07-06-2023under respondent Nos.3and 4 awarded in favour of the Petitioner company.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI LINGAMPELLY RAVINDER
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : GP FOR MINES AND GEOLOGY
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 7 : GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ Counsel for the Respondent Nos.8 to 10 : GP FOR pAy AND ACCOUNTS The Court made the following ORDER
u
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
WRIT PETITIONNo.9930of 2024
ORDER:
Learned Counselfor the petitioner fiied a letter
dated2O.0g.2024intheRegistryseekingpermissionof
this Court towithdrawthe writ petition'
withdrawn.However, there shall be no order as to costs'
Writ Petitionshall stand closed'
//TRUE COPY//
SD/. P. PAOMANABHAREDDY ASSISTANT REGI$TRAR I
SEGTION OFFICER
To
SA GJP
i.
_i
HIGH COURT
DATED:0311012024
ORDER
WP.No.9930 ot 2024
,i S r.1 I
I o
<<br>:: ,l
[ 7 ]i0\i zul
l:
:y'
DISMISSING THE W.P
AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS.
\l l>^,<br>
K
tt ., ...-.'*r.{
M/s. BSR Constructions
The State of Telangana
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
