The High Court dismissed a writ petition and a miscellaneous petition seeking appointment as a Civil Assistant Surgeon for local candidates. The court held that the petitioner's cause had become infructuous, justifying the dismissal.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
l33ol l
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK
WRIT PETITION NO: 942 OF 2018
Between:
Lukulapu Kamaraju, S/o. L. Trinadhm,34years,Ryo Nadagam Village and Post, Narasannapet mandal SrikakulamDistrict ...PETITIONER
AND
'1 . STATE OFTELANGANA, Rep.by its Principal secretary, Medical and Health Department Secretariat Buildings,Hyderabad 2. Th; Director, Public Health and familywelfare, Telanganastate at Hyderabad
,,.RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of theConstitutionof lndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled therewith,the High Court maybe pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or directionmore in the nature of mandamus, declaring theaction of the respondents hereinin not accepting the application sought to besubmitted by the petitionerseeking appointment as civil Assistant Surgeon inpursuance to the notificationNo. 01t2O17 dated 8.12.2017 on thepremise thatthe petitionerdo not fall withinthe ambit of Iocal candidate of Stateof Telangana as being illegal, arbitrary and is in viotation of Articles 16(2) and 371 D(2XCXi)of the Constitutionof lndia apart from in negation ofjudgment of the Hon'bleApex Court report in alR 1970 SC 422 and consequently direct the respondents toreceive and permit the petitionerto participate in the ensuing selectionprocess for thepost of Civil AssistantSurgeon in pursuance to the aforesaid notification
lA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition,the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents herein to receive andprocess the application sought to be submitted by thepetitioner seeking appointmentas Civil Assistant Surgeonin pursuance to the notification No. 01/2017, dated 8.12.2017 of the2nd respondent by permitting the petitioner toparticipate in theselection processpending the disposal of the above WP
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl.LAXMAIAH KANCHANI
Counsel for the Respondents:GP FORSERVICES The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK
WRIT PETITION No.942 0F 20ta
ORDER:
Wher-r the matter is taken up for hearing, Smt.B.Madhavi, learned counsel representing Sri K.Laxmaiah, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further ad.ir-tdication and it has become infructuous.
Miscellaneous petitions if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. \ r
,r?R'ii-'l""'t?[EF //TRUE COPY/I .>--
SE.CfIONOFFICER
To,
HIGH COURT
DATED:2811012024
ORDER
F\ E()F T€q
6r,
s.
€J{ 5N 3s
\b
tr
3tH + o
WP.No.942 of20'18
DTSMISSINGTHE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
b
/,.b
/
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to allow the petitioner to participate in the selection process for the post of Civil Assistant Surgeon.
Whether the rejection of the petitioner's application was arbitrary and a violation of constitutional provisions regarding local candidate status.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
aIR 1970 SC 422Referred¶7
alR 1970 SC 422
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Lukulapu Kamaraju
State of Telangana
Pulla Kartik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
