The High Court closed a writ petition regarding a contract driver's reinstatement with continuity of service. The court found the sole petitioner had died and no representation was filed, decreeing the writ closed without costs.
The writ petition closed without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3300 ]
HIGH COURT FORTHE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
SATURDAY,THETWENTY FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTYFOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRIJUSTICE NAGESHBHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION No;7825 0F 2014
Between:
V.Shekharaiah, S/o.Bheemaiah,aged abo-ut33 years' Occ Drrv-er'APSRTC f .O.No.Cg1gg'i, Coniract"Orire'r.-ianaurDepot,-R/o H No1-12515'Gramum Shitnimatta Mandal,Kosgi,MahaboobnagarDistrict
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition underArticle 226 of the constitutionof lndia prayingthat.inthe circumstancesstatedintheaffidavitfiledtherewith,theHighCourtmaybepleased toissueanywritorderordirectionmoreparticularlyoneinthenatureofwritof ,,nd",,.declaringthattheactionofthe3rdrespondentinnotconsideringrewitn Jontinuity ofservice to the petitioner as contract driveris ilrg;;;i aro]triry, illegal,unjustunrelsonableas the termination of the petitioneris against t" piiri"ipr"J oinaiural lusiice,consequentty directingthe respondentsto-treat3rd ,"rp""ali tproceedingiNo.sr/19(39)/12-DYcrM/RRdated11'7 2012 as re' in.irtur""t ofthe petitioner as a' driver withcontinuity.of service, 1$enO719e benefits and withall consequential service benefits including regularlzatlon oI tne services of thepetitioner with effect from 5'10'2010
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP.NO:973 3 0F 2014)
PetitionunderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedin the affidavit filedin support of the petition, ir,e-Higr,court may be ple_qsed_toissue JiL"i tr," respondentsto modify the order Sttlgtoslttz-oYcrM/RR dated 11.7.2}12fromfreshr"-"ngrg","nttore-engagethepetitionerwith-continuityof ."ir,"., attendancebenefits with all consequentialservice benefitsincluding regularizationof services of the petitioner
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. MOHD GHOUSEUDDIN (NOT PRESENT)
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI R ANURAG (SC FOR TSRTC)
The Court made the following: ORDER
I I
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION No.7825 of 2014
ORDER:
It is represented on 26.07.2024 by Mr.Mohd.Naseeruddin, learned counsel that
Mr.Mohd.Ghouseuddin, learned counsel for petitioner is no more. Therefore, this Court directed the Registry to issue notice and the matter was adjourn ed to 29 .O8.2024. On the said date, on perusal of the record, it was evident that notice sent to the petitioner was returned unserved with an endorsement 'party died' and no representation on either side. Hence, it was directed to be listed under the caption "for dismissal".
f
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- T.JAYASREE ASSISTAN\BEGISTRAR //TRUECOPY// SECTIONOFFICER t"'', \ one cc tosRl. MoHDGHoUSEUDDIN Advocate toPucl 2. OneCCto SRl. R ANURAG (SC FOR TSRTC) [OPUC] 3. TwoCD CoPies [5'+l
I I
HIGH COURT
DATED:21 10912024
ORDER
E I€
t/T v
JJ ct
i 1 [tt E2[
at
I
oe sp'.r c
WP.No.7825 ot 2014
CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
6
rl Irt
V. Shekharaiah
The APSRTC (Telangana RTC) and Others
Nagesh Bheemapaka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
