Disposed

Pokkula Rajani Kumari v. The State of Telangana and 4 Others

Telangana HC1 Mar 2024WP/6926/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed Writ Petition challenging unlawful posting order placing her in Zone-V instead of Zone-IV. Respondents submitted appeal disposed rejecting petitioner's case. Court disposed of writ permitting challenge to said order.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed off. Liberty granted to challenge the proceedings dated 01.09.2022, if advised.

Pokkula Rajani Kumari Vs The State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

[³³⁰¹ ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 6926 OF 2022

¶7

Between:

¶8

Pokkuia Rajani Kumari, W/o. Nagula Prakash,^{Aged about} 55 years, Occ. Multipurpose Health Assistant,^{EmployeelD. 2115495,} Khanapur Primary Health Centre, Dharmaraopet, R/o.^ShalommHouse H.No.4-76, Pakhal Road, Narsampet Mandal,Waranal District.

¶9

..PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by^its Chief Secretary^{to Government, General} Administration (SPF-l) Dept., T.S. Secretariat, Saifabad,^Hyderabad.

¶12

2 The Princrpal Secretary to Government, State^{of Telangana,Rep. by its} Principal Secretary, Health, Medical and Family^{WelfareDepartment,} Secretariat Buildings, Saifabad, Hyderabad.

¶13

J The Drrector/Commissioner, Health, Medical and Family^{Welfare Department,} 3'd Floor, DNIE Building, DM and HS Campus, Sultan^{Bazar, Koti,Hyderabad,} Telangana.

¶14

4 The District Medical and Health Officer, Hanumakonda,^{WarangalDistrict.}

¶15

5 The District lvledical and Health Officer, Nalgonda,^{WarangalDistrict.}

¶16

...RESPONDENTS

¶17

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution^{of lndia praying that in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith,^{the High Courtmay be} pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the^{nature of} Writ of Mandamus, declaring that the action of the 3'd^{respondentin placing the} petitioner in Zone-V, vide Proceedings No. HIV/CO/WA/ZVIN/UPU/0142'^dated 31t12t2O21 , contrary to the orders issued^{by the 1't Respondent' videG.O. ttls.} No. 317, General Administration^{(SPF.l) Department,dated0611212021and} contrary to the requesl made by^{the petitionerto post her to Zone-lV,as illegal,} improper, arbitrary, unjust, contrary to^{law, violative of Principles of naturaljustice}

¶18

¶19

and in violation^of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the constitution of lndia and set aside the same, by^holding that the petitioner is eligible and entifled to be posted at Zone-lV, by^virtue of the^guidelines issued by the 1't respondent, vide G.O. tvls. No. 317, General Administration (SPF.l) Department, dated 0611212021 .

¶20

IA NO:1 OF 2O22

¶21

Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated rn the affidavit filedⁱⁿ support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the i'd respondent,^to consider and dispose of the appeal of the petitioner dated 0210112021 ,^{with regard} to issuance of posting orders as lvlultipurpose Health Assistant^(Female) in Zone-lV, without reference to the proceedings No. HM|CO|WAlZVlMUPUlOl42, dated 311121202i, issued by the 3d respondent, pending disposal of the above writ petition

¶22

Counsel for the^Petitioner: SRI CH VENKAT RAMAN

¶23

Counsel for^{the Respondents:} GP FOR SERVICES

¶24

The Court made^the following: ORDER

¶25

¶26

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK

¶27

WRIT PETITION No. 6926 of2022

¶28

ORDER:

¶29

When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Pleader for Services has placed on record a copy of the proceedings in Memo No.8O28/c/2022-t dated 01.O9.2022 and submitted rhat in compliance of the interim order passed by this Court on O9.O2.2O22, tine respondents have disposed of the appeal hled by the petitioner duly rejecting her case.

¶30

Recording the above made submission, the Writ petition is disposed ol granting liberty to thc petitioner to challenge the proccedings, dated O1.O9.2022, if she is so advised.

¶31

costs

¶32

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. No SDI.^{MOHD.SANAULLAH ANS} R AS^{SISTANTREGIST}

//TRUE^COPYI/

SECTION^{OFFIC ER}

To,

I 2

J. 4. 6. 7 8 TJ GJPw

t"l

HIGH COURT

DATED:01 10312024

ORDER

WP.No.6926 of 2022

1 rl€ srA r€
?
(; .t?
o
2 [ APH 2U{ .L
*
t
O€,SPAIC

¶44

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS.

¶45

l<sup>-t" %d 3',

Pokkula Rajani Kumari v. The State of Telangana and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pokkula Rajani Kumari v. The State of Telangana and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Banoth Venkatram, Vs The State of Telangana

G. Adi Babu Vs The State of Telangana

K. Srikanth, Vs The Director of Public Health and Family Welfare

Dasharatha Banoth Vs The State of Telangana

Mekala Janaiah Vs Union of India

D.Srinivasulu Vs The State of Telangana and 3 Others