The Writ Petition was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to avail legal remedies, upon consent of the respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3166 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OFTELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OFI/,IARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYFOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICET.VINOD KUMAR
WRIT PET ITION NO: 6633 OF 2024
Between
Hazari Sanjay Singh, S/o. Late. NarsingBhanSingh, -R/o H. No. 8-323llBBlAl1 ,'Sii Krishna Nagar, Yousufguda,Hyderabad'T-S.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ol theconstitutionof lndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in theaffidavit filed therewith,the High Court maybe pleased to pass an order or orders one in thenature of Writ of l/andamus declaring the action of therespondent No.2for not consideringand drsposing the appeat fited under section18 of TS-BPASSACT DATED .23-02-2024 againstthe speakrng orders of 3rd respondent in notice No. coMPT1 7 1 7 IUCIC1 g/TPS/GHMCt2024, Dated.1 0-02-2024 anddeclare the said action as illegal, arbitrary against theprinciplesof naturaljustice and againstthe provisron of tr,4unicipal Act and Rules and TS-BPASSACT
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section'1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.2 not to take coercive steps and not to proceed with the demolition of the Petitioner structure pending disposal of the appeal filed under section 18 of TS-BPASS ACT Dated .23-02-2024 against the speaking orders of 3rd respondent in notice No. CO|VPT1TTTIUCIC19ITPS/GHIMC/2024, Dated. 1O-O2-2O24, pending disposal of the above writ petition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P. PRASHANT
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2&3: SRI M. A.K. MUKHEED, SC FOR GHMC The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI WSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR WRIT oN IIo.6633 of2o24
ORDER:
After making initia1 submissions, Iearned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw this Writ petition with liberty to avail the remedies open to the petitioner in law.
any, shall stand closed.
SD/. T. JAYASREE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//
SECTI FICER
HIGH COURT
DATED:1410312024
ORDER
ii."!_:
tc '.t lA
-.) It.
02 inr i1'lf
tll
.t
*
WP.No.6633 of 2024
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
*
H
o
Hazari Sanjay Singh
Principal Secretary, MAUD Department
Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner
Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Deputy Commissioner
T. Vinod Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
