The High Court closed Writ Petition No. 6252 of 2017 without costs, treating the matter as no longer requiring orders due to a prior interim order in a related miscellaneous petition.
No order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
l32s2l
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original J urisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
WRlT PETITION NO: 6252 OF 2017
Between:
G Muralidar, S/o.G.Swamy, Aged about 42years, Fi/o. Plot No.8l/'10,Sy. No. 77, Madhapur, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution oflndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiledtherewith, the High Court maybe pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction moreparticularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action ofthe Respondentsin not releasing the power supply to thepetitioner buildingin Plot No. 83112in Sy- No. 77 of Madhapur, Hyderabad as illegal,null, void, arbitrary and consequently directthe respondents to release thepower supplywithout insisting to occupancy certificate
l.A. NO: 1OF 2017(w PMP. NO: 7656OF 2017)
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that inthe circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, theHighCourtmay be pleasedto direct the 2nd Respondent to release thepower-supply to the petitioner buildingin Plot 311 n 7 ors
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K.DURGAPRASAD Counsel forthe Respondent No.1:AGP FOR ENERGY Counsel for the Respondent No.2:SRI R. VINOD REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCL The Court made the following: ORDER
I I
t
{l
HON'BLE MRS ]USTICESUREPALLI NANDA WR T PETITION No.62s2 0F oL7
ORD ER:
Heard Sri K. DurgaPrasad, learnedcounsel appearing on behatfof the petitioner,learned Assistant GovernmentPleader for Energy,appearing on behalf of respondent No.1and Sri R' Vinod Reddy, learned Standing Counselfor TGSPDCL, appearingon behalf of respondent No.2
,
" ...to issue an appropriateWrit order or direction more particularly onein the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaringthe action of the Respondents in not r-eleasing thepower supply to the petitioner building in Plot No.83/12 in Sy. No.77 of Madhapur Hyderabad as illegal,null, void, arbitrary and consequently direct therespondents to releasethe power supply without insisting tooccupancy certificate and to Pass...".
2
w 6252 mi't
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ Petition shall also stand closed.
SD/- L. VIJAYA LAXMI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
To,
SEC N OFFICER
1 . One CC to Sri K. Durqa Prasad. Advocate IOPUCI 2. One CC to Sri R. Vinod Reddy, SC for TGSPDCLIdPUCI 3. Two CCs to Gp for Fneroy. tiigh Court for the Siite oiibhngana, at Hyderabad [OUT] 4. Two CD Copies TJ GJP
HIGH COURT
DATED:0511112024
ORDER
WP.No.6252 of 2017
t E L xl
o
7
c) *
a s
.t
,\ u
<br>c
il- <br>il
c H'- ' rrt {
CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
G Muralidar
State of Telangana
Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Ltd
Surepalli Nanda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
