Mohammed Anwar v. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT FOR TTIE STATE OF TELANGANA AT…
HIGH COURT FOR TTIE STATE OF TELANGANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[340s ]
HIGH COURT FORTTIESTATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TWENTYFIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSANDANDTWENTYFOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLEJUSTICEMOUSHUMIBHATTACHARYA
WRIT PETITION NO:4597oF 2017
Between:
Occ: Agricultureano rr,1"ir6l'fiLru". ny" Mahabubnagar District
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 22s of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances :stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High cou( may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly on. in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the in action.of the respondents 1 to 7 in not taking action against the illegal excavation of the sand by the contrar:tors from.pedda Vagu violating the guides isstred by the Government tirFe to time vide G.O.Ms.No.3, 1 and C (Mines.l) Department, dt.8.1.2015, G.O.tr/s.No.15, landC (Mines.l) Depaftment, dt.19.2.2015 and G.O.Ms.No.30, Iand C (Mines.l) Department, dt.6.5.2015 is iflegar, arbitrary and consequenfly to direct the 2nd respondent to takr: steps to restrain the immediately, contractors who are illegally excavating the srand from Pedda Vagu situated at chityar Village, Makthar Mandal, [,lahabubnagar District
l.A. NO: 3 OF 20r7(wPMP. NO: 5546 OF 2017)
Petition under section 1sl cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fited in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to take steps to restrain the immediatery, contractors who are illegally excavating the sand from pedda Vagu situated at chityar Vifiage, Makthar Mandal, Mahabubnagar Eistrict, pending disposal of the writ petition.
l.A. NO: 10F 2017
MP. NO: 1319 oF 20171
Between:
AND
...RESPONDENTSMRITPETITIONERS
PetitionunderSectionlslCPcprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedin the affidavitfiled in support of the petition,the High courtmay be pleasedto vacate theinterimordedr dl. 17.02.2017passedin WPMP'No'55216 of 2017 in WP.No. 4597of 2017and dismiss the writ petition'
l.A. NO: 2OF 2017(WVM P. NO: 1995 0F 2017)
Petition under Section 1s1 cpc praying that in the circunrstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased vacate the interim order dt. 17.02.2017 in wpMp No, 5546 of 2017 in wp No. 4sg7 of 2017
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRt T. KISTAIAH(NOT PRESENT)
Counsel for the Respondents: MS. N. SAMEENA AGp REPRESENTING FOR SRI MOHAMMED IMRAN KHAN, ADDTTIONAL ADVOCATE GENERAL
The Court made the following: ORIIER
I I I
THE HON,BLEJUSTICE MOUSHUMIBHATTACIIARYA
WRIT PETITION NO.4597 0F 20L't
Ms. N. Sameena,ttre learnedAssistant Governrnent Pl'ead€r representing Mr. MohammedImran Ktran, the learnedAdditional AdvocateGeneral
ORDER:
No one appearsfor the petitioners'
2 This is thesecondconseclrtive date when the petitionersare unrepresented.
3.W.P.No.4597of2ol7,alongwitha]Iconnectedapplications'
is accordinglydismissed for default'Interim orders'if any' shall
stand vacated-There shall be no order as to costs'
sD/-v.KAvlTHA / ASSISTANTREGISTRAR./
//TRUECOPY//
S CTIONOFFICER
Hgh cour'[ror S'{a'{eor 'fhe To,I iffi"3fii::ff#j$#,#JuFEt?'"y':l
TJ GJP
frtc..
HIGH COURT
DATED:21 111t2024
ORDER
WP.No.4597 of 2017
-4't1=-
t:'1H? \ IA, (
k
't
1,J [ 4 i{ii' 2[25
)
*
cl
-, /l .sPA I c{
-+=:=i
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS
Pnq
tzl-toS
Mohammed Anwar and others
State of Telangana
Moushumi Bhattacharya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court