Court closed an old writ petition filed to challenge the legality of a recall notice issued by a bank branch manager, without costs or further orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3384 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI
WRIT PETITION NO: 36575 oF 2013
Between:
J. Prakash, S/o. Anjaneyulu, aged 57 years, Occ ; Ex-employee, Fl/o. 404, Ravi Chandra Apartments, 1 06-107, Kartikeya Nagar, Nacharam, Hyd'erabad - S00 076.
.....PETITIONER
AND
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ or order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of mandamus, by calling records, declaring the recall notice dt. 27.1.1 .2013 issued by the respondent No.4 as illegal, arbilrary, null, void, in collusion and unconstitutional.
|.A.NO:1 OF 2013( WPMP. NO: 452t68 OF 2013
Petitaon under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay
7
itt frrtf'", proceedings in furtherance to recall notice dt. 27.11.2013 issued by the respondent No. 4, pending disposal of the writpetition. |.A.NO:1 OF 2018
Between
....PETITIONERS/ RESPONDENTS Nos.3 & 4
AND
...RESPONDENTS/
PETITIONER No.1/RESPONDENT Nos.'l & 2
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased. to vacate the interim orders made in WPMP No. 4546812013 in WP no. 36575 of 2013 dt. 13.12 2013.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI V.GOPALA RAO AMANCHARLA
Counsel for the Respondents : M/s. V.UMA DEVI
The Court made the following ORDER
*:7
THE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI WRIT PETITION No.36575 OF 2013
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed seeking the following relief:
"to issue a ny u-tit or order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of mandamus, by callirLg records, declaing the recall notice dated 27.11.2013 issued bg *e respondent No.4 as illegal, arbitrary, null, uoid, in collusion and unconstitutional and pass such oth.er order or orders as this Hon'ble Court maA deems necessary and proper in the circumstances of the case.'
orders are required to be passed in this writ petition
No order as to costs.
Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand
closed.
SD/-N. SRIHARI ASSISTANT REG T /iTRUE COPY//
SECTION FFICER
To 1 One CC to SRI V.GOPALA RAO AMANCHARLA, Advocate tOpUCl 2 One CC to M/s. V.UMA DEVI, Advocate {OpUCl J Two CD Copies
SA GJP ],(
HIGH COURT
DATED:2811012024
ORDER
WP.No.36575 of 2013
1$ #- SI A. t
7
3 0 0Et 2ll4
co)a ,l
*t
<br>!)Espaict lt\1
CLOSING THE W.P
WITHOUT COSTS.
d,
{ b('
t<br>
J. Prakash
The Reserve Bank of India
The Union of India
The Lakshmi Vilas Bank Ltd.
The Branch Manager, The Lakshmi Vilas Bank Ltd.
Anil Kumar Jukanti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
