case of the petitioner that respondent No.4, who is her husband, was harassing her on one pretext or the other to bring additional dowry and started denying the paternity of their children, which necessiated her to file a r:omplaint against resporrdent No.4, which was registered as a case in Crime No.46 of 2O 15 for the offences punishable under section 498-A of I.P.C. and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 196 1. It is the further case of the petitioner thert u,hen respondent No.4 and his relatives have abused her bv relerring her caste and beat her, she was constrairred to file a complaint, which was registered as a case in Crime No.78 of 2016 for the offences punishable lrnder Sections 323 and 506 of I.P.C. and Section 3(l ) (xii) ol the Scheduled Castes and llcheduled Tribes (Prev<:ntion of Atrocities) Act, 1989 r'ead with Sections 3 (1) (s) and 3 (2) (Va) of the Scheduled(lastes and Scheduled Tribes (Prcvention of Atrocities) Amen<lment Act, 2015. After complction of investigation in Crime No.78 ol 2016, policc filed charge sheet, which was taken cognizancc as Spl.S.C.No.l20 of 2Ol7 and the same is
