Dismissed
K. Prabhakara Rao, Hyd v. General Bank (Crld)., Mumbai and 3 Ot
Telangana HCWP/33564/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[340s ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND WVTrury TOUN
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA
WRIT PETITION NO: 33564 OF 2015
Between:
K. Prabhakara Rao, S/o. Ramakrishna, Aged About 55 Years, Occ: Asst.l',1anagei', Oio. Union Bank Of lndia, Asset Recovery Bi'anch, D.No.6-1-67/14,2nd Floor, Public Garden Road, Saifabad, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to lssue any appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned letter No.RO/CRLD/1 375t15, dt.18- 09-2015 issued by the 2nd Respondent addressed to the 3rd Respondent requesting to recover Rs.10,0001 every month from the petitioners salary for credit the same to the educational loan account No.329606550100002 of Pulla Branch as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of naturaljustice and unconstitutional.
LA. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 43281 OF 2015)
Petition under section 1s1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased stay of all further proceedings in pusruance of impugned letter No.Ro/cRLD/i 37sl15, dt.18-09-2015 issued by the 2nd Respondent ihcluding recovery of Rs.10,0001 p.m from the petitioner's salary pending disposal of the writ petition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRt Y. RAVEENDRA KUMAR(NOT pRESENT) Counsel for the Respondents: SR( G. V. S. GANESH
The Court made the following: ORDER
L,
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA
WRIT PETITION No.33564 OF 2015
ORDER:
No one appears for the petitioner.
I
SD/. K.SREERAMA MURTH ASSISTANT REGISTRA R
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
TJ GJP
E,k
HIGH COURT
DATED:1311212024
.6<br>j ,)
C. 2 t oec zozl
al
*
€s PATC HEo
ORDER
WP.No.33564 of 2015
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR DEFAULT
WITHOUT COSTS
I
N
I
J-l \2--
<br>9c"+i&<br>
K. Prabhakara Rao
Union Bank of India
MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court