The High Court of Telangana dismissed a writ petition filed by an individual. The court held that due to the efflux of time, the cause did not survive for further adjudication and dismissed the writ as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3255 I
<br>
HIGH COURTFORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY.THE TWENTIETHDAYOF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVANKUMAR
WRIT PETITIONNO: 3338'lOF 2012
Between:
Mudike Srinivasulu,S/o.late M.Mallaiah, Age 49 years, Occ Agriculture,R/O' '[ Nr7i-,i4gio?s7 inew) 7-1-447 (oldl, M-arket Street, Secunderabad'
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
PetitionUnderAllicle226oftheConstitutronoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstances statedin the affidavit filed therewith the Hrgh court maybe pleasedtoissueawritofmandamusoranyotherapproprratewritorwrits,order or direction, declaringthe action of the 3rd Respondent rn refusing to register the sale deed dated 28-04-2oOOvide Refusal orderNo 3ot2oo7 dated 05-09-2007in respect of theplot bearingNo.124 -qglneasuring233 Sq yardsin Sy No 7413 in the layout of Ravi Co-operattveHousrngSocrety Ltd sltuatedat Mah€ndra Hills' East Maredpally, SecunderabadCantonmentas berng arbitraryand illegaland consequently directthe Respondents No 2 and 3 to registerand releasethe same after due registration
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP. NO:424720F20121
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying thatin the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed rn support of thepetition, theHighCourt may be pleasedto direct the Respondents No 2 and 3 to register thesale deed dated 28.04 2000 in respect of the plot bearing No.124 admeasuring233 Sq.yards in Sy.No7413 in the layout of Ravi Co-operative Housing SocietyLtd,situated at tvlahendra Hills, East Maredpally, Secunderabad Cantonment,pending disposalof the abovewrit petitron as otherwise the Petitioners will beput toirreparable loss and hardship
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl.P. BHANU PRAKASH
Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following:ORDER
I
HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.33381 OF 2072
ORDER:
Today when the matter has been taken up forhearing, learned counsel for thepetitioner submits thatdue to effluxof time, the cause in the writpetition doesnot survivefor further adjudication.
closed. No order as to costs.
SO/. A. SRINIVASA REDDY ASSrsrANr(REjllsTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
1 One CC to SRl. P. BHANU PRAKASH, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High Courtfor the Stateof Telanganaat Hyderabad [OUT] 3 Two CD Copies BM I,S ?rr
?rr
HIGH COURT
DATED:2011112024
ORDER
1 .S T.1 f(:
c..
( )
.t
('
12 lil 2]2{ ,t
:lii
.i
WP.No.33381 of 2012
DISMISSING THEWRIT PETITIONAS INFRUCTOUS WITHOUTCOSTS (+ {f,fl,'1 6 c -E-*'t
Mudike Srinivasulu
Government of Andhra Pradesh
N.V. Shravankumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
