Dismissed

Mohd Saleem Uddin v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC28 Nov 2024WP/33331/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court permitted the withdrawal of Writ Petition No. 33331 of 2023 filed by the petitioners against revenue officials and dismissed the petition as withdrawn without costs. The underlying dispute involved a request for cancellation of a Pattedar Pass Book.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw Writ Petition No. 33331 of 2023 was granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.

Mohd Saleem Uddin Vs The State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

t^32e6I

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

(Speciat Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO:33331 OF 2023

¶8

Between:

¶9

Mohd Saleem Uddin, S/o. Late. Mohammed Abdul Kareem, Aged. 54 yrs, Occ. B{siness, R/o. H.No. S -B -11Ot9tSl1O, Sateha f.lagar, Gbicdnda,-Ranga Reddy District.

¶10

Z Qg|anl V37{91i, Sio. Late. Gulam Dastagir, Aged. 55 yrs, Occ. Business, Rl/o.

¶11

H. No.9-8-1'1 0/8/1 1, Kancha, Golconda, Ranga" Reddy Oisiriii.-

¶12

...PET|T|ONERS AND

¶13

1 lhe Slatg 9f Telangana, Rep by its principal Secretary, Revenue Department,

¶14

Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

¶15

The District Collector, Ranga Reddy, Ranga Reddy District.

¶16

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella Division. Ranoi Reddv Districr 4. The Tahsitdar, Moinabad Maldat, Moinabad, Ranla Retdy Di*iicl.^--- 5. Mohd. Aliuddin Ahmed, S/o. Mohd Abdut Khadeer] Aged. i+ yrs, Occ. Business, Rt/o. Plot No. 305, Jahanuma Teeqal KLinti. Hvderaba'a.^--

¶17

Mohd._Yousufuddin, Q/o. Mohd. Moinuddin, Aged. 38 yrs Occ. Business, Rl/o. H.No. 9-8-1 10iCl35, Dhan Khota, Gotconda. Hvderabad.

¶18

pql.am_R-aQbqry Siq cutam Dastagir, Aged. 50 yrs, Occ. Business, Fl/o. H.No. 9-8-110/7/8, Saleh Nagar, Hydera6ad.

¶19

...RESPONDENTS

¶20

Petition under Article 226 ot the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to pass an order(s) or direction(s) more particularly one in nature of writ of Mandamus in declaring the action of the official Respondent No. 2 to 4 in not considering the representation Dt.2311012023 made by the petitioners seeking the cancellation of Pattedar Pass Book issued to the Unofficial Respondent No.5 over a Joint ownership Property i.e., all that the agricultural land admeasuring Ac.0429 Gts., in Sy.No. 225i3 situated at Chinna Mangalaram Village, Moinabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District as Violation of Article 14, 21 and 300 -A of constitution of lndia.

¶21

¶22

IANO:1 OF 2023

¶23

Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the officiar Respondent No.2 to 4 not to entertain any transactions over agricurturar rand admeasuring Ac.04-2g Gts., in sy.No. 22513 situated at chinna Mangalaram Village, Moinabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶24

lA NO: 2 OF 2023

¶25

Between:

¶26

; ffirrs,-im.ffig+t[ur,rg+ruf,,i,:1:h^*

¶27

...PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS 5 TO 7

¶28

AND

¶29

;flrdt"**tti"rffi;;-ffi'#;;

¶30

... RESPONDENTSMRIT PET]TIONERS 3 4 5 ffg+fuitr**r+iitlrrr'i$Jffi 6 The Tahsildar, Moinabad Mandal, Moinabad, Ranga Reddy District.

¶31

,.RESPONOENTS/RESPONDENTS.l TO 4

¶32

petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in suppo( of the petition, the High court may be preased to vacate the interim order d ated:08.12.2023 passed in wp No.3333 112023. Counset for the petirion"r", gI!-?ltSFtULLA REPRESENTING SRt VISHAL !:::t^{ror rhe Respon."T} [:yiiJi:tfPX3"#l?;;-^"vrenAl counsel for rhe Respondent Nos.5 ro ii Jnr rr,,lirB. ,o, AHMED ouefnr The Court made the following: ORDER

¶33

¶34

¶35

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASXAR REDDY

¶36

WRIT PETITION No.33331 of 2023

¶37

ORDER:

¶38

Mr.Shafiulla, learned counsel representing Mr.Vishal Kumar Jain, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand

¶39

closed. No order as to costs.

¶40

SD/.A. SRINIVASA REDDY ASSISTANT REG6TRAR //TRUE COPY// q//^/ SECTION-OFFICER

¶41

To 'l . One CC to SRI VISHAL KUMAR JAIN, Advocate IOPUCI 2. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court^{for the State of Telangana, at} Hyderabad. [OUT] 3. Ohe CC to SRI MOHD. MOIN AHIVIED QUADRI,^Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies PSK, LSw

HIGH COURT

DATED:2811112024

ORDER

WP.No.33331 of 2023

16s s l,r.
tr,
(, 13 0tti ,,.{
<br>I
DA}:I'nT''

¶49

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS.

¶50

¶51

Mohd Saleem Uddin v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohd Saleem Uddin v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kongari Sathaiah, Vs The State of Telangana

Gyaneshwar Goud Vs The State of a.P., Rep. by its Secretary to revenue

P. Dass Goud Vs The State of A.P. Rep. by its Prl. Secretary to

Mohammad Adbul Sather Vs State of Telangana

Srikanth Setti Vs State of Telangana

S. Kishore Vs The state of Telangana