The High Court of Telangana dismissed a writ petition filed against power distribution authorities as infructuous following the observation that the cause of action no longer survived for adjudication by the respondent counsel.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
132521
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 285'13 OF 2016
Between:
P.Balaramakrishna, S/o: Late P Rama Rao, age about 50 years, Occ: business, Rl/o Plot No.303, Casa Rosa Apartment, Padma Rao Nagar, Secunderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents in not attending to releasing of the electrical power (service connection) despite erection installation of the transformer for the supply load to the flats, applied for the residential complex (Casa Rosa Apartments), situated at Municipal bearing No.61-289, Padmarao Nagar, Secunderabad, as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law and consequently direct the respondents to release the electrical power to the premises.
4
I
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO:35303 OF 2016)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in suppo( of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To direct the respondents to provide electrical connection and release the power forthwith on temporary basis to the flats of Casa Rosa Apartments, situated in Municipal bearing No.6-1-289, Padmarao Nagar, Secunderabad, pending disposal of main Writ Petition.
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2016(wPMP. NO: 54238 oF 2016)
Betwee n:
Javed Razack, S/o. Abdul Razack, aged about 48 years, Occ: Advocate, Executor of the Last Registered Will of Joseph Philip Christie Office 3-6-259, Suite B, 3'" Floor. Span Chambers. Himayatnagar, Hyderabad - 500029.
...PETITIONER/PROPOSED RESPONDENT 4 in WP.No.28513 of 20216
AND
...PETITIONERIRESPONDENT in W.P.No.2851 3 of 2016
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 2 to 4 in W.P. No.28513 of 20'16
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead the Petitioner/ Proposed Respondent as Respondent No. 4 in the above Writ Petition No. 2851 3 of 2016 and WPMP No. 35303 of 2016.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K. V. L. NARASIMHA RAO Counsel for the Proposed Respondent: RAJASHEKAR THALLAPALLY Counsel for the Respondents: SRI R VINOD REDDY(SC FOR TSTRANSCO) The Court made the following: ORDER
I
I
I
I
:\ ,.1
HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
T PETITI 513 of 2 1
ORDER:
Heard Sri K.V.L.Narasimha Rao, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri R. Vinod Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for TSTRANSCO, appearing on behalf of respondents.
"...to issue an appropriate Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction oF the respondents in not attending to releasing of the electrical power (service connection) despite erection installation of the transformer for the supply load to the flats applied for the residential complex (Casa Rosa Apartments), situated at Municipal bearing No.6- 1-289, Padmarao Nagar, Secunderabad as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law and consequently direct the respondents to release the electrical power to the premises and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case."
) \
I
\
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions , if any, pending in the Writ Petition shall also stand closed.
SD/. L. VIJAYA LAXMI AS A T REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To, 1 . One CC to Sri K, V L Narasimha Rao, _ Advocate tOpUCI 3 Pf 991: !!Ralashekar l!a|9pa!y,.{{vocate.idFuct' r. une uu ro sn R Vinod Reddy(SC for TSTRANSCO) IO1TUCI 4. Two CD Copies TJ GJP qk
\
HIGH COURT
DATED:0711112024
ORDER
1 r{e Q rAr€
q
2 7 JAt'l ?025 a
o
c.O
o€ s T 99
WP.No.2851 3 of 2016
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS
WITHOUT COSTS. (n
I
(7*q a ( 2-<br>l
0 Ca(^&<br>
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for dismissal of the writ petition as infructuous should be granted.
P. Balaramakrishna
The Southern Power Distribution Company, of T.S. (TSSPDCL) Limited
Surepalli Nanda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
