This order dismisses a writ petition seeking quashing of land conversion proceedings via a ruling allowing the petitioner to file a statutory appeal and directing the authority to dispose of it within six months. No costs were awarded.
Directive to consider and dispose of the statutory appeal within six months of filing; writ petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32e61
I
HIGH COURT FORTHE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIRSTDAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENTY FOUR
,
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKARREDDY
WRIT PETITION NO:28O14 OF 2024
Between:
Bantu Sudhakar, Sio.Late Bantu Narayana Ganjula Narayana, fge-47 fears' Occ. Business, R/o . H.No- 7-1 1-'1080,Near Railway Track,tsodnan Koao' Nizamabad'
...PETlrloNER
AND
...RES'ONDENTS
Petition under Article226 of the constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the circumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ or orderor Direction more particularly one in the nature of wRtT OF MANDAMUSdeclaring the NALAorderProcedgs. No. 2300305095 dated 05-07-2023in respect of the land admeasuringto an extentof Ac.'l -3100 in Sy. No. 2955and 2915situated at Nizamabad Urban Village, Nizamabad south Mandal,NizamabadDistrictandProedgs.No.23005436T4daledl9-o7-2o23in respect of the land admeasuringto an extent of Ac 2-3900 in Sy' No' 29B2lA' 2gsl,zgs}situatedatNizamabadUrbanVillage,NizamabadSouthMandal' Nizamabad Districtas illegal, arbitrary and violativeof principles of naturaljustice andconsequentlysetasidethesameandfurtherdirecttheRespondentNo.4not grant any order in respect ofsubject property
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition unde'section '151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may, be preased to direct the Respondernts No. 2 to 4 to consider and dispose of the representation dated 20-04-2024 and 23-04-2024, pending disposar of the main writ petition, in the interest of justicer.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. LAMBA SAI KUMAR
Counsel forthe Respondent Nos. 1to4: AGp FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.5:_
The Court made the following: ORDER
I i I I I I i
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKARREDDY
I I t t \
WRIT PETITION No.28O14 of2O24
ORDER:
This Writ Petition, under Article226 of the Constitution of India, is filed seekingthe following relief:
n....to issue o Wit or Order or Direction more particularly one in the noture of WRIT OFMANDAMUSdeclaingthe NALA order Proceedings -No.23OO3O5O95 dated 05.07.2023 in respect of the land odmeasuing toan extent of Ac. 1 310O in SE' No 2955 and 2915 situated ot Nizamabadurban Village,NizamctbadSouth Mand al, Nizamabad Distictand ProceedingsNo' 230O548674 doted 19.07.2023 inrespectof the land admeosuing to an extent of Ac.2-39O0 in Sg.No.29B2/A,29Bland 298Osituatedat Nizamabad urban ViltageNizamabadSouthMandalNizamabad Distict os illegalarbitraryand uiolatiue of pinciptes of naturol justice and. coiseqtenttg set aside thesameand furtherriire-ct the -Respond.ent No.4 not grant anA order in respect of subject propertA...."
i'
2
Maruthi Ka:an instituted a suit in O.S.No.02 of 2OO7 for partrtron or. the file of the I Additional Distr: ct Judge, Nizamabad :md after contest, the said suit was dismissed ujde its judgment and decree, dated 31.10.2019. It is further stated thzrt 1.he petitioner, who is defendant No.6 in the said suit, filed A.tl.No. 112 of 2O2O on the file of this Court and the same is pending for adjudication.
..-7
I
({
2980 situated atNizamabadUrban Village,Nizamabad South Mandal, NizamabadDistrictand taking advantageof the said proceedings, respondentNo.5 is making efforts to alienate the said property infavour of the third parties and is proceeding to change the natureof the land; aggrievedby thesaid conversion orders,the petitioner filed representations,dated 23.04.2024 beforerespondent No.2, but the same has not been considered tilldate.
4
i , I
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shal1 star-rd cl,lsed.
t\
To,
//TRUE coPYrt
assrsrffiffiY',IXA
sE6TroN oFFrcER
1 . The principa I Secre . P.egrglal-atrr s.,Hva!?rry;r[."venue(stamps and Registration)Department, ';::: i tr#i:*=#-'#trffiffi.*ffi"tp,th-'*ffi ",,,"
BM BS k t
HIGH COURT
DATED:21 l1'112024
1 yrE SIAr€
k
A
O 3 0 J[ 2[25 c
,+
*
, a9
f ltr,, I C\1
ORDER
WP.No.28014 of 2024
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
?+-
a,<br>qg
L L
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the approach be admissible under the NALA Act, 2006 when an appeal is otherwise pending.
Whether the Revenue authorities are directed to consider the appeal if filed by the petitioner.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Bantu Sudhakar
State of Telangana
District Collector, Nizamabad
Revenue Divisional Officer, Nizamabad District
Joint Sub-Registrar, Nizamabad South
Bantu Harimanth Reddy
C.V. Bhaskar Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
