A writ petition challenging non-promotion was withdrawn by the petitioner. The Court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3301 I
HIGH COURTFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial OriginatJurisdiction)
MONDAY, _THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWOTHOUSANDANDTWENTYFOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK
WRITP ETITIONNO:.27624 oF m22
Between:
Rl,J.,tn1*'s8i?n'#3;ts'";,'"ee',^xx;ATuIn#if;'S**5i3t"':r"';Ifffi : nijenaidnagai,Hvderabad-SoO030' ...'ET'T'ONER
...'ET'T'ONER
AND
5 D; fi/t.Govaronan,slo.'i'io]iii.to'*",ngt'Iot knirwn' Associate Director ot
...RESPONDENTS
Petition underArticle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed therewith'the High Court maybe pleased to issuea writ order or direction especiallyone in the natureof writ of mandamusdeclaring that a)The actionof the respondentNo'2 in not promoting thepetitionerfrom professor stage-s to Seniorprofessor stage-6 (Academic level 14 to 15)whilepromotingthe juniorsto the petitioner is illegal and arbitrary and violative ofUGC Regulations and University{Carrier Advancement Scheme) Regulations,201 1. b)declare that petitioneris entittedto be promoted as Senior Professor stagesin terms of University(Carrier Advancement Scheme)
7
t
Regulations, 2o11 from the date of promotion of his juniors viz., (respondents No.4 to 7) w.e.f. 11-12-2).020. c)decrare that petitioner is entifled to promoted as Senior Professor stage-ei in terms of U n iversity(carrier Advancement scheme) Regulations,20l 1 and without reference to the CAS Regulations 20.19.
IANO:1OF2 022
Petition underr Section 1s1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondents to promote the petitioner as Senior professor stricfly in terms of university (carrier rrdvancement scheme) Regurations, 2011, pending disposar of the Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SRINIVASA RAO MADIRAJU Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Gp FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI S.CHALAPATHI RAO, SC FOR
PJDTSAU
counsel for the Respondent No.3: sMT. MEGHA RANI AGARWAL, sc FoR UGC Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.4 TO 7: -
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLESRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK
WRIT PETITION No.27624of2022
ORDER:
Sri MadirajuSrinivasaRao'learned counsel for the petitioner' filed a letterdated'll'12'2O24 in' the Registry seeking permission of this Courtto withdraw the present writ petition
c Permission,as sought for, is accorded
3 Accordingly,the Writ Petition is dismissedas withdrawn'
Miscellaneousapplications' if any' pendingin this writ petition'
shallstandclosed'No costs'
SD/.T. TIRUMALADEVI ASSTSTANTRE9ISTRAR
^! -.).'
V
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To 1. one CC to SRI SRINIVASA RAo MADIRAJU'rA!Y9SaI9.I9-P-V9]
i. 5n; 6c 6 s Ri 5. C HAr-npnrHinno, s c .ro-q P-J-rsA!J- t-o i^u-ql ^'
5: il; 6c i" srtrr. rr,rebun nAr.rincAnw L, qg FoR ucc IoPUCI
;. ' iil; d6s'i" Gp FoR HiGiEit'EDUCniio-N, Hish courtfoithe State of
Telangana, at HYderabad. [OUTI
5. Two CD CoPies
PSK.
BS
HIGH GOURT
DATED:1611212024
ORDER
WP.No.27624 ot 2022
1 HE S14/' t---(
(
P
aoJ 2 3 0t[ 2il2[ az
I
(C
DgSFATCS
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
g
/,,s
It
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to be promoted to the stage of Senior Professor in terms of the University (Carrier Advancement Scheme) Regulations, 2011?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Nijenaidnagai
State of Telangana
Pulivendula University
University Grants Commission
Ahmed Hussain
Government of India
Pulla Karthik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
