Disposed

Hulda a Crawford Memorial Hospital v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC3 Oct 2024WP/27410/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged the District Medical and Health Officer's failure to consider applications for hospital license renewal. The Court directed the respondent to consider the latest representation, conduct a hearing, and pass orders within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed 3rd respondent to consider petitioner's representation dated 13-08-2024, provide opportunity of hearing, and pass orders within four weeks.

Hulda a Crawford Memorial Hospital Vs The State of… — Service and Employment | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

[³¹⁸³ ]

¶3

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

THURSDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 27410 OF 2024

¶8

Between:

¶9

Hulda A CraMord Memorial Hospital, A Charitable and^{Non-profitable} Organization, Vikrabad, Rep. by its Medical Superintendent^{DR. AvinashSio} Vijay kumar, Aged 44 yedrs, Occ Medical superintend, Hulda A^Crawford m-eriiorial Hospiial, R/o Near N. T. R. X Road, Hospital complex^Vikararabad District

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary,^{Medical Health and} Family welfare Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶13

z The Commissioner, Medical Health and Family welfare^Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶14

The District lr/ledial Health Officer, Vikrabad District,^Vikrabad.

¶15

...RESPONDENTS

¶16

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of^{lndia praying that in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith,^{the High Court may be pleased} to issue a Writ, Order or direction more^{particularly one in the natureof Writ of} Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent^{3rd to considerthe petitioner} application/representations dt. 10.^'12. 2018 and^{13- 0B- 2024 is illegal,arbitrary,} highhanded and unconstitutional and violative of^{Art. 14, 19,21 and 300- A of the} constitution of lndia and consequently direct^{the respondent. No. 3rd respondents} in to consider the application/representations^{dt. 10- 12- 2018 and I 3- 08- 2024} submitted by the Petitioner for renewal^{for hospital license}

¶17

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶18

Petition under Section¹ 51 CPC^praying that^{in the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed in support of the^{petition,the High court maybe pleasedto direct} the 3rd respondent to consider the Application/representations^{dt. 10- 12- 2018 and} 13- 08- 2024 submitted by the Petitioner for renewal^{for hospital license}

¶19

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. S GANESH

¶20

Counsel for the Respondents: Gp FOR MEDICAL HEALTH FW

¶21

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶22

¶23

THE HONOURABLtr SRJ JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN^REDDY

¶24

WRIT PETITION No.27410 OB 2024

¶25

ORDER:(ORAL)

¶26

This writ petition is filed by the^petitioner seeking to declare the action of respondent No.3 - the District Medical^{and Health} Officer, Vikarabad District, in not considering its application^dated 10.12.2018 and 13.08.2024, as being illegal and arbitrary.

¶27

Heard learned Counsel for the^petitioner and^learned Assistant Government Pleader for Medical,^{Health and Family} Welfare.

¶28

Learned Assistant Govemment Pleader for^{Medical,Health} and Family Welfare submitted that the^{representationof the} petitioner will be duly considered and requested this Court^{to direct} respondent No.3 to act upon the latest representation of^the petitioner dated 13.08.2024.

¶29

Recording the aforesaid submissions of the leamed^Assistant

¶30

Government Pleader for Medical, Health and^{FamilyWelfare, this} writ petition is disposed of, directing respondent^{No.3 to consider}

¶31

¶32

¶33

the representation of the petitioner dated 13.08.2024 and pass orders, by giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, in accordance with law, within a period of four (4) weeks from the

¶34

date ofreceipt ofa copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶35

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any,

¶36

pending in the writ petition stand closed.

¶37

SD/- P. CH. NAGABHUSHAPIBA ASSTSTANT REGT'TRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTIoN #,,"=*

¶38

To,

¶39

The Principal Secretary, Medical Health and Family welfare Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶40

The Commissioner, Medical Health and Family welfare Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶41

The District Lledial Health Officer, Vikrabad District, Vikrabad.

¶42

4 One CC to SRI. S GANESH Advocate [OPUC]

¶43

E Two CCs to GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH FW,High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT]

¶44

Two CD Copies KKS LS Y.V

I I

ll l i ; i

HIGH COURT

DATED:0311012024

(
)
r [l ti, 2021
L

ORDER

WP.No.27410 of 2024

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS

¶54

n^co'?seA YY-io-ttn\

Hulda a Crawford Memorial Hospital v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hulda a Crawford Memorial Hospital v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Srinivasa Rao Vs The State of Telangana

Oruganti Sammireddy Vs The State of Telangana

Smt. Abbagani Kanakalatha Vs The State of Telangana

Gaddam Raju Yadav Vs State of Telangana

Garlapathi Sathish Kumar, Vs The State of Telangana

Arshiya Fatima Vs The State of Telangana