Petitioner sought permission to withdraw a writ petition challenging a non-application of mind by the Collector. The High Court granted permission to withdraw with liberty to file revisions and dismissed the petition.
Permission granted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file revision under Article 227 before the appropriate court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
."il URT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[31831
,-$.[ DAY,THE FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARY TWo THoUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR I t 'RESENT ll
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
I,C*,, "rr,r,o, no' ,ur. or roro
Between: lI
Sri. B.Nagesh, S/o' Ramachander, Hindu, a/a 38years, Occ.Agricrtrture,Fi./o Venkatya- ThartUat Chandrugonda Mandal, Bhadradri-KothagudemDistrict, Telanoana Stat€: I
AND I I ..PErrrroNER
Department, S4retariat, Hyderabad, Telangana State-500004.
circumstances :-::- .trJi [f" irt the ;:": affidavitfiled "-,-::'l therewith,the .High ]:::i::Court maybe pleased to issue ,n f,p$roprirt. Writ, Order or directionparticularly onein the nature of Writ of fr,f thJa r., declaring the aciinn of2nd respondentin not receiving and not #tid"ring the re-openpetition,other materialfi+ed ifl O.S.No.98/202f on flf,t file of Agent toGovernment (District Collector), Kothagudem, for fair tilproper adjudication ofthe proceedingson merits as per law and oro".drr".3 illegal, arbitrary and violative ofprinciples ofnatural iustice. and nrticle tU{ f Constitution of lndia, consequently DIRrcTthe 2nd ,e"ponOent to receivt td "on.il", the re-openpetition, olherrnaterialfiled in 0.S.No.98/2021 on ti,'t file of Agent to Governrnent {DistrictCollector), Kothagudem, on rner ,1" Ss per law andprocedure, in the interestof justice
..:/'. I
IA NO: 10F 2024
Petition under tion 151 CpC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed i I pport of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to STAY of all further sceedings in 0.S.No.98/2021 on the file of Agent to r Government (Distri Eollector), Kothagudem, inctu ding pronouncement of judgment, pending d al of the writ petition, in the interest of justice
f : SRI P. VENKANNA Counsel for the "",,,Il nts: GP FOR REVENUE counsel ro, tt " n""#rlf. The court -aa" tne Ar[r, ing: ORDER
//
HONOURABLE, SRI JUS'tICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY
WRIT PETITI ON No.2513 0F 2024
ORDER:(ORAL)
. Mr. P. Venkanna, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission of this court to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty to file revision under Articre 227 of the constitution of India before the appropriate Court.
As a sequel therero, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending
in the writ perition stand closed.
SD/- V. HARI PRASAD AssrsrANrffzirRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To, 1. Two CCs toG R REVENUE ,High Courtfor ttre Stat'e of Telangana' at Hydera bad IOU 2. Ohe CC toOhe CC toCC to VENKANNA, Advocate IOPUCI
<br>
i HIGH COURT I DATED:01/02 4
o lHE sTA 14:
k
o(v
2
q 11 nAs 7024
/
*
si: -2
I ORDER lWP.No.2513 o 024
i DISMISSING WRIT PETITIONAS ,WITHDRAWN THOUT COSTS .4r' t W
4
B. Nagesh
The State of Telangana
B. Vijaysen Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
