The High Court of Telangana disposed of Writ Petition No. 25066 of 2023 as infructuous. The Court held that since an order by the Reserve Bank of India/Bank Ombudsman dated 08-02-2023 was already in the records, there was nothing remaining for adjudication.
The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
\
[340s ]
HIGH COURT FOR THESTATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE FOURTEENTHDAY OYOCTOBER TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICEMOUSHUMIBHATTACHARYA
WRIT PETITION NO: 25066 OF 2023
Between:
Kesa Prabhakar, aged60 years, S/o.Veeresham,Occupation . ,Bufllg::, R/o.H.No.13-195,-Chinthapanduwada,Mancherial, MancherialDrstrrct 504208
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article226 of the constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in theaffidavit filed therewith,the High courtmay be pleased to issue a writ orderor direction the particularly in the nature of writ of ir/andamus directing therespondents to see that the petitioner's complaint is considered and diiposeoff whichis pending before the 3 respondent with No.N202223023385289by initiatinga time bound actionin the interestof justice
lA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under section151 CPC praying thatin the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filedin support of the petition,the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3 respondent toconsiderand disposeoff the petitioner complaintpending before him withNo.N202223023385289 as expeditiously as possible pending writ petition
,/
Counsel for the petitioner:SRl. G RAMACHANDRA REDDY Counsel for the Resoondent No.1: SRI cADt PRAVEEN KUMAR (Dy. soltctToR GENERA_ OF INDtA)
999^r:lfor the Resprndenr Nos.2&3 : MS.pRATUSHA BOPPANA FOR M/S N.LEGAL HYDERABAD
9o^r11_l_f-ollheRespr>ndent No.4: sRr Y.AUGUSTTNE RUBENSON FOR SRr K.B RAMANNA DORA
Counsel for the Respc,ndent NO.S: __
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA
/',
WRIT PETITION No.25O6 of 2o23
Counsel for the petitioner: Sri G.Ramachandra Reddy.
Counsel for the respondcnt Nos.2 & 3: Ms.pratusha Boppana
representing M/s.N.Legal Hyderabad,
Counsel for the respondent No_4: Sri y.Augustine Rubenson
representing Sri K.B,Ramanna Dora.
ORDER:
Nothing remains for adjudication in the writ petition after the
order passed by the respondent No.3/RBI on O8.O2.2O23.
accordingly disposed of as having become infructuous. There shall be
no order as to costs.
o sD/-s.MA LLIKARJUNA ASSISTANTREGI R /,TRUECOPY// .SECTIO FFTCE
to'',.
$sw
1
,
HIGH COURT
DATED:1411012024
I
I
)
ORDER
WP.No.25066 of 2025
:-<br>e t.
ra.
,v
s
c)
S,
.{il ir
=a
c\J
i.o
,, /
o :." 2'
.-/
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COS-rS
\
\
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking direction to RBI to dispose of a complaint time-bound should be allowed or not.
Whether the writ petition has become infructuous upon the order passed by the Bank Ombudsman on 08.02.2023.
Kesa Prabhakar
Union of India
Reserve Bank of India
Bank Ombudsman
State Bank of India
Kesa Kumara Swamy
Moushumi Bhattacharya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
