High Court Bench dismissed a writ petition filed by an educational institution challenging denial of affiliation for two B.Tech courses as infructuous due to efflux of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3418 I
IN THE HIGHCOURTFORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial OriginalJurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLETHE CHIEF JUSTICEALOK ARADHE AND THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICEJ SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION NO:24 2020F 2018
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition underArticle226 o'f lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavitfiledt therewith'the High Court may be pleasedtoissueawritororderordirectionmoreparticularlyoneinthenatureof Writ of Mandamusdeclaringa) the Jawaharlal Nehru TechnologicalUniversity
Hyderabad Grant of Affiriation Regurations for the cofleges/rnstitutes appricabre from the academic year 2o1g-19 with reference to Reguration 3.30 providing for temporary suspension of instructions in academic program/courses empowering the university to refuse affiriation to the coflege in case of three preceding consecutive years of row enroflment, ress than 2spercent of university sanctioned intake. in any university affiriated course as ilregar, uncon stitutio na I and ultravires to the Jawaharrar Nehru Technorogicar University Act, 20oB and to strike down the same, and b) the action of the 1st respondent university in rejecting affiriation for two (2) B.Tech courses namery Mechanicar Engineering and EEE r:f the petitioner institution by placing under No-Admission status for the academi,: year 201g-19 communicated through the deficiency report dated 13_04_2018 thereby not granted affiriation for the said courses through proceedings dated 16-05-20.1 8 while granting affiliation to other courses, as illegal, arbitrar.T and without jurisdiction and in viorative of Articre i 4 and 19(i )(g) of the conslitution of rndia and consequenfly direct the 1st Respondent university to process the apprication of the petitioner for grant of affiriation for 2018-2019, submitted onrine on 21 02 2o18' in accordance with the Affiriation procedure and Reguralions 20i B-19, without reference to reguration 3.30 and grant affiriation for the said two courses and intake applied by the petitioner institution.
IANO:1OF2 018
Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the 1st respondent to process the apprication of the petitioner institution submitted onrine on 21-o2-2o18 for grant of affiriation for the acadenric year 20.r g_ 2019, tor the said two courses namery B.Tech Mechanicar Engineering and EEE without reference to Reguration 3.30 0f the JNTUH Grant of Affiriation Regurations for the colleges/rnstitutes appricabre from the academic year 20rB-19, dury furnishing the deficiency report for the two (2) B.Tech courses basing on the FFC inspection report thereby granting an opportunity of compriance by way of firing appeal incruding an opportunity to appoint.new facurty for the deficiencies by constituting serection committee with the nominees of the university as provided under the affiriation regurations and consider for grant of affiriation basing on the compliance for the academic year 2O1B_1g.
Counsel forthe Petitioner : SRI PAPAIAH PEDDKULA'rep.' SRI SRICHARANTELAPROLU
Counsel for theResPondents:
The Court madethe following:ORDER
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTTCE J.SREENTVAS RAO
WRIT PETTTIO N No.242O2 of 2018
ORDER ; @er the Hon'bte the Chi.ef Jlsti@ Atok Aradhe)
Mr. Papaiah Peddakula, learned counsel reprr:senting
Mr. Sricharan Telaprolu, learned counsel for the peritioners submits that the issue involved in this writ petition cloes not survive for consideration on account of efllux of time.
The writ petition is therefore dismissed as infructuous.
Miscellaneous applications, if any penciing, shajl stand
closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
SD/- P.Ch. NAGABHUSHAMBA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
dj' SECTION OFFICER
To,
BSK
GJP Yy
)
HIGH COURT
DATED:2 411012024
ORDER
WP.No.24202 of 2018
i1l:
C
k
t)t') r't il
? 7 NIIi 2024
o , :l
€S ATc l-l o {
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
^cd"b
Vr-
t6$t
Jagruti Education and Welfare Society
Dr. O. Srinivas Reddy
Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Hyderabad
The State of Telangana
The Convener, TSEAMCET-2018 (Admissions)
Alok Aradhe
J Sreenivas Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
