Writ petition under Article 226 seeking Writ of Mandamus to direct police to register a crime regarding non-repayment of a loan. Court held the cause does not survive for adjudication and relief is infructuous, dismissing the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1.
t32e6 I
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAYOF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYFOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICEC.V.BHASKARREDDY
WRIT TION NO: 22757 OF 2015
Between:
Ch. Sattaiah, S/o Late Ch.Shiviaiah,Agedabout 56 years,Occ ; Agriculture'H.No.s- 1 76, Maheswaram Mandal,Maheswaram, Rangareddy District.
.....PETITIONER
AND
.....RESPONOENTS
Petition Under Atticle 226 of theConstitution of lndia praying that in the circumslances stated in the affidavitfiled therewith,lhe High Court maybe pleased to pass an order or orders one in the nature ofWRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondentNo.3for not registering the crime against respondent No.4 inpursuance to the representationdated 10-03-2015made by thepetitioner against the respondents4 for not repayingthe loan amountof Rs. 25,26,000I- to thepetitioner herein as suchthe respondent No 4 committed the offences for cheating, fraud, criminalbreach of trust, assault and threatening to the life of thepetitioners and declarethe same as illegal,arbitrary' againstthe principles of natural justice.
I.A.NO:1 OF 2015(WPMP.NO:2942 00F 2015)
Petition Under Section1 51 CPCpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in supportof the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondentNo.3 to registeredthe crime against respondent No.4 in pursuance to the representation dated10-03-2015 made by the petitioner. against the respondents4 for not repaying the loan amountof Rs.25,26,000/- to the petitioner hereinas such the respondentNo.4 committedthe offence for cheating, fraud, criminalbreachof trust, assault andthreatening to the life of the petitioner pending disposal of the main writpetition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G'GOUTHAMKRISHNAADVOCATE FOR SRI SURESH SHIV SAGAR
Counsel for the RespondentNos.1 to 3 : GP FOR HOME
Counsel for the RespondentNo.4: -'
The Court made the followingORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTTCEC.V.BIIASKARREDDY
WRIT PETITION No.22757of 2015
ORDER:
Sri G.Goutham Krishna,learnedcounsel representing Sri Suresh ShivaSagar, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits thatthe cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudicationand the relief sought in the writ petition has becomeinfructuous'
Recording the said submission,the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.No costs.
As a sequel, the miscellaneouspetitions pending,if
any, shall stand closed.
I I
SDF V.KAVITHA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER
Tol
'1. Two CCs to GP Foril Homb, High Court for the State of Telangana at
Hyderabad. IOUTI I
2. One CC to Sri Suresh Sh iv Sagar, Advocate [OPUC]
I
3. Two CD Copies I
SA li I
I
GJ]*\B- I
I I
I
I
I
I
: jl I i t
I l ,I i
I I
:l ii :! ' : I I iL it I
I
IIli
,I
HIGH COURT l,i
,
1'
x
I
il
li
DATED:0910112024
ti
,i,I ,:.)(
C)
I
tsC.<br>(_
tr ,t,D 1,.:
i[f
ORDER \ ^o
i
I ii *
WP.No.22757'ot 2015ot 20152015 :) H
WP.No.22757'ot 2015ot 20152015
DISMISSING TIIE w.P
AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
b
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ch. Sattaiah
The State of Telangana
The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad
The Station House Officer, Police Station Maheshwaram
Amgoth Raiu
C.V.BHASKARREDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
