A polytechnic sought restoration of its approved engineering course intake reduced by a government order and allotment of students for the completed academic year; the court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous since the academic year had long ended.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32e61
HIGH COURT FOR THESTATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Origindl Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAYOF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
:
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE C.V.BHASKARREDDY
WRIT PETITION NO:22489 0F 2015
Between:
:
."PETlrloNERs
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition underArticle 226 of lhe Constitution of lndiaprayingthat in the circum$tancesstated in the affidavitfibd therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ ororder or Directionmoreparticularlyone in the nature of Writ of Mandamusdeclaring the actionof the 1"1 respondentin reducingthe approved intake ofthe petitionerinstitutionto 60 for civil Engineering,60 for MechanicalEngineering,60for Mining Engineering (1"1 Shift) and 6O for Mining Engineering(2nd Shift)from the approved intake of 120 forCivilEngineering, 120 for Mechanical Engineering,240 for Mining Engineering(1st Shift), and 240 tor MiningEngineering(2ndShift)seatsvideimpugnedG.oRTNo..l38dated Z7t6l2e15 asultra vires A.P.Education,Act, 1982as adaptedto the Statepf
Telangana and quash the same as such {vith a direction to the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner functioning in terms of the approved intake of the 4th respondent.
.A. NO: 1 OF 201 MP. NO 2 OF 15
Petition under Section'151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of tfre petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to allot students to'the petitioner college in respect of the courses of Civil Engineering, Mechanical Enginepring, Mining Engineering (ist Shift)qnd Mining Engineering (2n( Shift) construing the intake to be at 120 lpr Civil Engineering,'120 for Mechanical Engjneering, 240 for Mining Engineering (1st Shift) and 240 for Mining Engineering (2nd Shift) as approved by the ATCTE vide its proceedings dt. 7 1412015.
Coqnsel for the Petitioners: SRI S. SRI RAM
Oounsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FgR HIGHER EDUCATION
Coensel forthe Respondent No.4: SRI RAMAKANTH REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 and 3: ---
The Court made the followingl ORDER
--7
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION No.22489 of 2015
ORDER:
This Writ Petition has been filed seeking to declare the action of respondent No. I in reducing the approved 1 intake of the petitioner's institution to 60 for Civil Engineering, 60 for Mechalical Engineering, 6O for Mining Engineering (1st Shift) and 60 lor Mining Engineering (2"d shift) from the approved intake of 72O for Civil Engineering, l2O for Mechanical Engineering, 24O lor Mining Engineering 11st shift) and 24O for Mining Engineering (2"a Shift) seats uide impugned G.O.Rt.No.138, dated 27.06.2015 as ultra vires of the Education Act, 1982 and quash the same.
t I
2
<br>
infructuous. No costs.
any, shall stand closed.
/
^33,t+^1T'J[tH'"-=^H /rrRUE bopvrr secnJf,orrrcen
To. '"'1 . On" CC to Sri S. Sri Ram, Advocate tg.Pyg 2 Two ccsto Gp to, iiiilJi eilrta-ti*,'Hlghcburt for the state of Telangana, at Hvderabad [OUT] 3. 6#'ccT;3;i'KRimakanth Reddv. Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CDCopies TJ (pBS
HIGH COURT
DATED:20109t2024
ORDER
WP.No.22489 of 2015
1HE s14 |4'
o R
i 97,!All 2&i
I
..,';,]i
DISMISSTNG THE WRIT PETITIONAS INFRUCTUOUS
WITHOUT COSTS. r* 4Fl't-\ 1c"j^u
B.V. Krishna Polytechnic, rep. by its Secretary Sri B. Kantha Rao
B. Kantha Rao
The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department
State Board of Technical Education and Training
The Convenor (POLYCET-Admissions) 2015
The All India Council for Technical Education
C.V. Bhaskar Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
