The High Court of Telangana heard a writ petition challenging the award of a canteen contract to a third party, which proceeded as infructuous.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3300 I
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA , ATHYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITIO NNO:21746 OF 2015
Between:
N. Narendra Kumar S/o Narsimha Rao, Aged 40 years, occ proprietor Of Sri canteen at 3-8-183/'l Jaheerpura, Khammaim, ffrairmam Oisti.ict.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High - cJurt may be pleased to issue writ or direction preferabry writ of mandamus dlclaring t" altion of the respondent nos. 3 and 6 in proposing to award canteen contract of District Hospital Khammam in favour of respondent-no.7 pursuant to the notification dt.1B6-2015 as illegal, arbitrary, and viorative of principres of naturar lusticel:and consequently decrare that the respondent no.7 inerigibre for award oi "onirr"i ot canteen work and direct the respondent to allot the canteen contraci ;;rk i, favour of the petitioner
,/,
l.A. NO:1oF 2015 (WPMP.NO: 28018OF201s)
PetitionunderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedin the affidavitfiledin support of the petition,ine-Hign Court may be please-d -t9q9.nt stav of allfurther proceeOingspuisuant to the Gndernotificationdt. 18-06-2015 p"riOrg the disposalof writ petition in the interest of iustice'
l.A. NO:2oF 2015 (WPMP.NO: 33923 OF2015)
Petition underSection 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavitfiled in support of the petition, ifre Uigf' Court may be pleased to stay theevictionofthepetitionerfromthecanteenlocatedintheDistrictHospital, Khammam inpursuanceof letter issuedby the respondentno 6 in Rc'No' Plg/Spl/2015d1.12-8-2015pending disposalof writ
Counsel forthe Petitioner:SRl. KOWTURU PAVAN KUMAR
Counsel forthe Respondent Nos'1,3,4,5&6:GP FOR MEDICALHEALTH & FW Counsel forthe Respondent No'2:SRI RACHNAS WADDEPALLI(SCFOR TG vvP)
Counsel for theRespondent No.7: -'-
The Courtmade the following: ORDER
HON'BLT SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
20L5
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
2 Recording the said submission, this Writ Petition is
dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand
closed.
SD/. P. PADMANABHAREDDY ASSISTAN REGISTRAR
,TRUE COPY//
S TION OFFICER
To,
; l i!. ii I
I
I I i i
I ri i I I Iii I I
HIGH COURT
DATED:2511012024
(-
((
1/ oEt: 20(,i I
C
t
.SPATCIi
ORDER
WP.No.21746 of2015
DISMISSING THEWRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS (fr#l..., filt2' r" t 1a4i&)
N. Narendra Kumar
The State of Telangana
The Telangana State Vaidya Vidhana Parishath
The Hospital Development Society, Khammam
The District collector/co-chairman, Hospital Development Society
Y. Venkateswarlu
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
