Dismissed
Sri Ugamraj Nahar, v. The State of Telangana
Telangana HCWP/21712/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3296 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THESTATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAYOF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYFOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEC.V. BHASKARREDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 217120F 2015
Between:
Sri Ugamraj Nahar, S/o. Sri BhawarlalNahar, A ged 61 years, Occ. Business, Rio. li.No. 54-751c, M.G. Road,Secunderabad
..PETITIONER
AND
...RESPoNDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ol lheconstitutron of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiledtherewith,the High Courtmaybe pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction in the natureof mandamusor otherwise declaring the inaction on thepart ofthe Respondents to give equivalentland in the vicinity orpay just compensation to thePetitioner as per the Right to Fair compensation and Transparency in LandAcquisitionRehabilitationand Resetilement Act 2013, for theland that has beenlost by the Petitioner admeasuring 1,618.09 sq.yards inSy.No.133and its sub numbers situatedin Bollarum village, Jinnaram Mandal,Medak Districtis arbitrary, illegal,colourable exercise ofpower and non-est inlaw and consequently declarethe sameis opposed to Article 300-4 ofthe constitution of lndia and the Fundamental Rights enshrined therein.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO:27981 OF 2015)
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Courtmay be pleased to direct the Respondents herein to forthwith remove thepipeline andhand over the land that has been encroached upon by the Respondents or in thealternativeto give equivalent land in the vicinity orpay just compensation tothe Petitionerfor the land that has been lost by the Petitioner admeasuring I,618.09 sq.yardsin Sy.No,133 and its sub numbers situated in BollarumVillage, JinnaramMandal, Medak District,pending disposal of this Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s. YOGITA PRAKASH FOR SRIT.S.PRAVEEN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 TO 4: GP FORREVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.S: SRI G.NARENDER REDDY,SC FORTGZPP- MPP.GPPS
The Court made the following: ORDER
tr !:
,/.
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION No.21712 of 2OlS
ORDER:
Ms.Yogita Prakash, learned counsel representing Sri T.S.Praveen Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has fairly submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the relief sought in the writ petition has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the writ petition is
dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if
any, shall stand closed.
SD/-V.KAVI HA ASSISTANT REGIS R
//TRUE COPY//
sEcTtoN o ICER
To
4 Two CD Copies PSK. GJP
HIGH COURT
DATED:0510912024
ORDER
WP.No.21712 of 2015
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
S I A ] A
{
q n i'r
0 IJ ij2 ,l
),,
: t-t)
.a:--:
w
r1
Ugamraj Nahar
State of Telangana
Collector, Medak District
Revenue Divisional Officer, Medak Division
Tahsildar, Jinnaram Mandal
Gram Panchayat, Bollarum
C.V. BHASKARREDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court