High Court dismissed a writ petition filed for absorption as a regular technician, stating the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter due to non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-. .1
[3300 ]
)
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION NO: 20356 OF 2005
Between:
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or direction one or more in the nature of writ of Mandamus by directing the Respondents to absorb the Petitioner herein on regular basis in the post of Technician at AIR Nizamabad with the benefit of continuous service with effect from ihe date of his joining as casual labour at AIR Nizamabad.
l.A. NO: I OF 2005(WPMP. NO: 25921 OF 2005)
e.
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying thatin the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in supportof the petition, the HighCourt maybe pleased to direct the sth Respondent to continue theservices of the petitioner at AIRNizamabadby withdrawing the letter of terminationvide No. 1O(2)2002lElAIR/NZB dt.5-8-2002 during thependency of the abovewrit petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI D. MADHAVARAO
Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 to 5: SRI GADIPRAVEEN KUMAR, DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA
Counsel for the Respondent No.6: GP FORLABOUR
The Court made the following: ORDER
{.
',/
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION No.2O356 of 2OO5
ORDER:
When the writ petition was called on 28.08.2024 there u,as no representation on behalf of the petitioner, hence, it was directed to be listed on 05.09.2024 under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if
any, in the w-rit petition, shall stand closed.
.t
SD/. N.CHANDRA SEKHARRAO ASSISTAN REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
/
SECTION OFFICER
To,
HIGH COURT
DATED:0610912424
ORDER
( o R Trl
o
I o
U
|: I
2 2 |;tt 2n2
(
*
<br>Q:slr-l
WP.No.20356 of 2005
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NONPROSECUTION
WITHOUT COSTS
*dd
t Yr-
it6\A
t.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P. Ravindrudu
Union Of India
Nagesh Bheemapak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
