The High Court of Telangana dismissed an old writ petition filed in 2013 regarding a forest notice as infructuous, accepting the submission that the cause of action no longer survives due to the efflux of time.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32ss ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STA,TE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY ,THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 19785 OF 2013
Between:
Deepak Patel, Son of Gopat Patel, aged about 34 years, Partner of Om Laxminarayan lndustries, Plot No. 11 N2, IDA Phase - I, Patancheru, lvledak District.
...PETITIONER
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the Hiqh Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, direction or order declaring the Notice Rc. No.1688/2013153(iii), dated 2010412013 issued by the Divisional Forest Officer, Medak, the 3'd respondent herein, as illegal and void
l.A- NO: 2 OF 2013(WPMP. NO: 24229 OF 20.13)
Petition under section 1s1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the Notice Rc.No.1688/20131s3(iii), dated 20/0412013 issued by the Divisionar Forest officer, Medak, the 3,d respondent herein pending disposal of the writ petition
r.A. NO: 1 0F 201 MP. NO:2 415 0F 2013)
Between:
...PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS
AND
P^"_"!*-lgl"],,Son.ofGgpat .patet,agred about 34 years, partner of Om Laxmrnarayan tndustries. plot No. 11 N2, IOA phase _'1, paiancneru, frrteaal District.
...RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS
Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support oF the petition, the High court may be preased to vacate the interim orders dt.09.072013, passed in wp. tvrp. No.24229 of 2013 in WP.No.19785 of 2O13
Counsel for the petitioner: SRl. p. KAMLAKAR
Counsel for the Respondents: Gp FOR FORESTS
The Court made the following: ORDER
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVANKUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.19785 OF2013
ORDER:
Today when the matter hasbeen taken up for hearing,
learned counsel for thepetitioner submit that due to efflux of time, the cause in the writpetition does not survivefor further adjudication.
closed. No order as to costs.
SD/-V.KAVITHA
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,/
//TRUE COPY'
SECTION OFFICER
To, 1. One CC to SRl. P. KAMLAKAR, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR FORESTS, High Court for the State of Telangana at
Hyderabad [OUT] 3. Two CD Copies BM GJP
sq,
HIGH COURT
DATED:01 10812024
ORDER
WP.No.19785 of 2013
1 ti F- S fA 14:
e
14 0[r m
.t
D E s
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTOUS WITHOUT COSTS
6 fp.(.,.., "*t'
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition praying for declaration of a forest notice as illegal became infructuous due to the efflux of time.
Whether the writ petition filed in 2013 required adjudication on merits in the year 2024.
Deepak Patel
State of Andhra Pradesh
Principal Chief Conservator of Forest
Divisional Forest Officer, Medak
Forest Range Officer, Narsapur
N.V.Shравan Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
