The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the rejection of a nomination form for a Sarpanch election as infructuous because the tenure of the elected Sarpanch had expired in 2020, rendering the cause of action dead.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[33021
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 18552 OF 2015
Between:
Kandula Mallaiah, S/o Yellaiah Aged about 56 Yrs, Occ BasketMaker R/o H.No.2-7411 , Gajalapuram Village, Thripuraram Mandal, NalgondaDistrict
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESP.NDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled therewith, the High Court maybe pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction moreparticularly onein the natureof Writ of Mandamus declaring the action ofthe 6th respondent in not receiving petitioner nomination form in the election of Sarpanch ofGajalapuram Grama Panchayat, Thripuraram Mandal, NalgondaDistrictto be held on '19.06.2015to 24.06.2015 is illegal, arbitrary and inviolationof the principles of naturaljustice l.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 23997OF 20 't 5)
Petition under section 151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in supportof the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 6th respondent toreceive the nominationform of the petitioner in the
election of Sarpanch of Gajalapuram Grama Panchayat, Thripuraram f\rlandal, Nalgonda District to be held on 19.04.2015 to 24.06.2015, pending disposal of the writ petition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI N. SREENIVASA YADAV
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVELOPMENT
Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.2to5: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.6: SRI G. NARENDER REDDY (sc FoRTG ZPP-MPP-cPPS)
Counsel for the Respondent No.7: -
The Court made the following: ORDER
7
THE HON'BLESRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.18552oF 2015
ORDER:
Heard.
infructuous. No orderas to costs.
any, shalI standclosed.
SD/. P.Ch.NAGAB HUSHAMBA ASSISTANT //TRUECOPY// wzo SECTIONOFFICER
\
ra_:-.i<:r-..-:r+-
--ll*,jg
HIGH COURT
DATED:0310112024
ORDER
g,lATE 6,
9
otr t\ lr\ 1$\ C)
o
+.
I 669f;'..'
WP.No.18552 ot 2015
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTOUS WITHOUT COSTS
)P)<br>
1 issue framed by the court
Whethera petition questioning the rejection of a nomination form is maintainable when the elected term has already concluded.
Kandula Mallaiah
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Department
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department
District Collector/Election Officer, Nalgonda
Revenue Divisional Officer, Miryalguda
The Tahsildar, Thripuraram Mandal
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
