Writ petition seeking declaration that freezing of petitioner's bank account was illegal and directing its de-freezing. Petitioner withdrew the petition via letter dated 21.11.2024. Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn without costs.
Dismissal of the writ petition as withdrawn. Interim orders vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[34051
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Originat Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA
WRIT PETITION NO: 17544 OF 2024
Between:
A$iruUdaya Bhaskar,S/o VenkateswaraRao, Aged 46, occ. Business, R/o 1-88, Nacharam, Khammam District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to pass an order or direction or writ, particularly in the nature of Mandamus duly declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in Debit freezing the account vide No. 088510100000733, at the instance of tetter from the 3rd respondent vide Dispatch No. 1166 dated 23.05.2024, as illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and consequenfly, direct the 2nd respondent to de- freeze the above account forthwith in the interest of justice.
1A NO: 1 OF 2024
.Petition under Section'l 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to de-freeze the petitioner's Savings Account No. 08851 01 00000733 forthwith.
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRI P'RAMA SHARANA SHARMA
Counsel for the RespondentNo.1 & 2: M/s. K.RADHASREESRAVYA,REP' FOR M/s. V.DYUMANI
Counsel for the RespondentNo.3: GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following:ORDER
'7
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA
IIIRIT PETITION NO. 17544 0F 2024
Mr. P. Rama Sharana Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Ms- K.. -Radha Sree Srar,ya, learned counsel representing Ms. V. Dl,,umani, Iearned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 and 2.
ORDER:
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the cause for filing the writ petition does not survive anymore and places a letter dated 21.71.2024 addressed by him to the Registrar (Judicial) seeking to withdraw the writ petition.
lo costs.
SD/- T.TIRUMALA.DEVI ASSISTANT RRGISIRAR //TRUE COPYII sEcnoN Nr,"=* /
BSR
G
HIGH COURT
DATED: 2611112024
ORDER
,1 t{ e S 1416
<br>v
i u: [:r] 2l2t
^+a
t
tj
OF-s rr/ aCg
WP.No.17544 ot 2024
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION
AS WITHDRAWN,
WTHOUT COSTS
A$iru Udaya Bhaskar
Union Bank of India
Station House Officer, The Ayberpoldi police station, Udaipur District
Moushumi Bhattacharya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
