Three writ petitions seeking protection against dispossession and consideration of regularization applications under G.O.Ms.No.59 were dismissed as infructuous after counsel submitted the reliefs sought had become moot.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
t32e61
HIGH COURTfOR TH€ STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE T\A/ENTY SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMAER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION NOs: 15082 15ff)4 and 15100 of 2019
WRIT PETITION NO: 15082 OF 2019
Between:
Kaleem Ahmed Ansari, Sio. late Abdul Hameed Ansari, aged about 65 lrears, Occ.Business, F!/o. H.No.14-'liB, Near Water Tank, Baghllngampally, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that inthe ckcumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court maybe pbased to issue a writ, order or directron moreparticulady one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of therespondents particulady the ffh respondent in trying to dispossess thepetitroner byway of interferirgwith his possession and enjoyment over land admeasuring 63 sq. yards, part andpa{cel of house bbaring municipal no.1 €- 1/8, Near Water Tank, 8aghlingampally, Hyderabad, duringpendency of application of thepetitioner made for regularization under G-O.Ms.M-59 Revenue(Assignment-l)Depa{tmenl, daGd.30.12.2O14 that too after receivingrequtred regularisationcharges from
':i
the petitioner, is illegal, arbitrary, unjust, unconstitutiona I and in violation of principres of naturar justice and arso viorative of Articres 14, 21 and300-A of the Constitution of lndia, and consequen.y direct the respondents to consider the application of the petitioner in terms of G.O.Ms.No.59 Revenue (Assignment-l) Department, dated.3o.12.2o1 4, immediately.
lA NO: 1 oF 2019
Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pteased to direct the respondents not to disposs.ss or interfere in any manner whatsoever with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over tand admeasuring 63 sq. yards, part and parcel of house bearing municipal no.1_8_1/8, Near Water Tank, Baghringampary, Hyderabad ti,,consideration of his apprication made For regularization under G.O.Ms.No.59 Revenue (Assignment-t) Department, dated_ 30.12.2014, pending disposal of the writ petition.
Counset for the petitioner: SRI MOHD MOIN:AHMED eUADRI
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to n, Cp fOA ngVeNUe
Counsel for th€ Respondent No.5: SRI G.VTSHWESHWAR REDDy,
SC FORTSHB
WRIT PETITIONNO:1 5094 0F 2019
Behrveen:
lvlohammed Khaia Ansari years. HyderabadOcc.Dnver. R/o.H. i,3',"#l7r:',$J:,'ffl [?o*l?,,:ff fl d jl[,,,i,:
AND
.-.PETITIONER
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapralng that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit {iled therewith, the High Courtrnay be pleased to issue a writ, order or di@tion more particularly one in lhe nature of Writ of Mafldamus declaring the action of the respondentsparticu{ady theSth respondent in trying to dispossess {hepetitbner by way of interferirgwithhis possesskln and enirynient over {and admeasuring 63 sq. yards,part andgarcel of house bearing municipal no.1-8-1/8,Near Water Tank,Baghlingampally, Hyderabad, during.pendency of application of thepetitioner made {or regr.rlarization under G.O.Ms.No.59Revenue (Assignment-1)Department, dated.3o.12.2014 that too after receivingrequired regularisation charges from the petitioner, is illegal, arbitrary, unjust,unconstitut.ronaland in violationof principles of natural justlce and also violative of Articles 14, 21 and3OO-A of the Constitution of lndia, and consequentlydirect the respondentsto consider the application of thepetitioner in terms ofG.O.lr,4s.No-59Revenue (Assignment-l) Department, dated.30.1 2.20'l 4, immediately.
lA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition urder Section 151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition. theHigh Court may be pleas€d to direct the respondents not to dispossess orinterferein any manner whatsoever with the possession and enjoyment of thepetrtioner over land admeasuring 63 sq. yards, part andparcel of housebearing munrcipal no.1-8-1/E},Near Water Tank, Baghlingarnpally, Hyderabad till considerationof his application made for regularizatircn under G.O.Ms.No.59Revenue(Assignment-l)Depadrnent, datd:3O.12.2O14,perding disposalof the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MOHDMOINAHMED QUADRI
Counsel for the RespondentNo.1 to 4: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.5:SRI G.VISHWESHWARREDOY' SC FOR TSHB
WRIT PETITION NO: 15100 OF 2019
Between:
Abdul Sattar Ansari, S/o.late AMul Hameed Ansari aged about 61 years, Occ.Driver, R/o.H.l.l,o.1€-1/8, Near Water Tank, Baghlingampally, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petrtion under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction. more particularly one in the nature of Wrrt of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents partir;ularly the 5th respondent rn tn/ing to dispossess the petitioner by way of inter{ering with his possessron and enjoyment over land admeasuring 63 sq. yards, part and parcel of house bearing municipal no.1-8-1/8, Near Water Iank, Baghlingampally, Hyderabad. during pendency of application of the petitioner made for regulaflzation under G.O.Ms.No.59 Revenue (Assignment-1) Department, dated.30 12.2014 that too after receiving requlied regularisation charges from the petrtioner, isi illegal, arbitrary, unjust, unconstitutional and i..r violation of principles of natural .justice and also violative of Articles 14,21 and 300-A of the Constitution of lndia, and consequently direct the respondents to consader the application of the petitioner in terms of G.O.Ms.No.s9 Revenue (Assignrnent-t) Department, dated.30. 1 2.201 4, immediately.
lA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
direct the respondents not todispossessor interfere in any manner whats9ev€r with thepossession and en!:ynrentof the petitionerover {and admeasuring63 sq. yads,part andparcelof house bearing municipal no.1-8-1l13, Near Water Tank, BagHingarrpatly, Hyderabadtill considerationof his application made for regularization under GO.Ms.No.S9Revenue {Assignment-l)Department, dated, 30.12.2014,pending disposalof the writ pe{ition.
Gotrnsel for the Petitioner:SRI MOHD MOINAHMEO QUADRI Counsel for the RespondentNo.1 to4: AGPFOR REVENUE
Counsel for the RespondentNo.S: SRIG.VISHWESHWARREDDY, SC FOR TSHB
The Court made the following:COMMON ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION Nos. 15O82 15O94 and l5l(X) of 2019,
COMMON ORDER:
The learned counsel for ttre petitioner subrnits that the cause in these writ petitions no longer survives for adjudication, as the reliefs sought therein have become infructuous.
Recorrling the above submission, these Writ Petitions are dismissecl as; i nfructuous.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pcnding, if any, shall stand closcd. No order as to costs.
AS S ANT REGISTRAR
/,TRUE COPY//
TtoN orrtceR
To, 1 One CCto SRI IIOHDMOIN AHMED OUADRI' Advocate[OPUC] 2 One CCto SRI G VISHWESHWARREDDY'SC FORTSHB [OPUC] 3 Two CCsto GP FOR REVENUE,High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad IOUT]
4 Two CD CoPies BSR GJP
HIGH COURT
DATED: 2711112024
r:,c >lA/,r
/ -t'
P
(; 2 2 tts z0z5 o
-h
\ -,
\ I
i
o55 p 7g1-:\t
COMMON ORDER
WP.Nos.15082, 15094 and 15100 of 2019
DISMISSING ALL THE WRIT PETITTONS AS INFRUCTUOUS,
WITHOUT COSTS
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kaleem Ahmed Ansari
Mohammed Khalid Ansari
Abdul Sattar Ansari
State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department
The District Collector, Hyderabad District
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Hyderabad Division, Nampally, Hyderabad
C.V. Bhaskar Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
