Dismissed

Preethi Bai v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC7 Nov 2024WP/14928/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition under Article 226 concerning agricultural land, the petitioner sought to prevent registration of sale deeds. The High Court permitted the withdrawal of the petition and dismissed it as withdrawn with liberty to file appropriate representation.

What did the court decide?

Permission accorded to withdraw the writ petition. The writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file appropriate application/representation.

Preethi Bai Vs The State of Telangana — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

[^32s51

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 14928 OF 2022

¶7

Between:

¶8

Preethi Bai, W/o. Dinesh Singh, Age 46^years, Occ; Housewife,^{R/o.H.No.14-10-} 1 350, Dhoolpet, Mangalhat, Hyderabad.

¶9

.....PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

'1 . The State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary to the Revenue Department Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

¶12

The District Registrar, Ranga Reddy District, Prashanth Nagar,^Kukatpally, Hyderabad.

¶13

The Sub-Registrar, Gandipet, Premises No. 13-1-1197, Maha Lakshmi Nagar, Narsingi, Hyderabad.

¶14

K.C. M. Reddy, S/o. Masthan Reddy, Age. Major, Occ. Business,^R:/o. H. No. 10-1 -1 8127, Shyam Nagar, Hyderabad.

¶15

K. Brahmaiah, Sio. K. Venkateshwarlu, Age. 64 Years, Occ. Business,^Rl/o. Hanuman Tekdi, Hyderabad.

¶16

Lakshmi Narayana, S/o. V. Radha Krishna Murthy, Age. 48 Years, Occ. Private Service, R/o. H. No. 9-4-800/1 1/A, Salarjung Colony, Hyderabad.

¶17

G. Apparao, S/o. G. Pydiayya, Age.71 Years, Occ. Business,^Rl/o. H. No. 136-438/fu89, Satayanarayana Nagar, Gudi Malkapur, Karwan, Hyderabad.

¶18

.....RESPONDENTS

¶19

Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the^{High Court may be} pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ directing the respondents No. 2 and 3, to consider the representations of the^petitioner daled. 24-12-2021 , nol to entertain any sale deed or any other conveyance deed in regarding with the^properties i.e.,

¶20

the agricultural land admeasuring Ac. 5.'l 7 gts in Sy. No. 176, Ac. 1.'l 7 gts in Sy. No. 236/1 , Ac. 1.25 gts in Sy. No. 23612, and Ac. 7.02 gts in Sy. No. 237, situated at Puppalaguda Village, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, if submitted by the respondents No. 4 to 7, or any other persons claiming through them.

¶21

l.A.NO:1 OF 2022

¶22

Petition Under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be^pleased to direct the respondents No. 2 and 3 to consider the representations of the petitioner dated. 24-12-2021 , not to entertain any sale deed or any other conveyance deed in regarding with the properties i.e., the agricultural land admeasuring Ac.5.17 gts in Sy. No.'176, Ac. 1.17 gts in Sy. No.236/1 , Ac. 1.25 gts in Sy. No. 236/2, and Ac. 7.O2 gts in Sy. No. 237, situated at Puppalaguda Village, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, if submitted by the respondents No. 4 to 7, ot any other persons claiming through them.

¶23

|.A.NO:2 OF 2022

¶24

Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit me to take out notice upon the respondents No's. 4 to 7, by way of substitute service by publishing the notice in "Namaste Telangana" of Hyderabad District Edition.

¶25

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI K.VENUMADHAV

¶26

Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : GP FOR REVENUE

¶27

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 to 7 : -

¶28

The Court made the following ORDER

¶29

¶30

HONOURABLE SRI^{JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR}

¶31

WRIT PETITION No.1492a^OF 2022

¶32

¶33

ORDER:

¶34

When the matter is taken up for hearing,^{learned counsel} for the petitioner^{seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the} present writ petition with liberty to^{file appropriate application} / representation before^{the concerned Sub-Registrar-}

¶35

Permission is accorded^{to withdraw the writ petition.}

¶36

Accordingly, the writ petition^{is dismissedas withdrawn} with liberty as prayed for.

¶37

Miscellaneous petitions, if^{any, pending inthis rvrit}

¶38

petition shall stand closed. No costs.

¶39

SD/. A.SRINIVASA REDDY ASSISTA T REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPYII

SECTION OFFICER

Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana^at Hyderabad. [OUT] 2. One CC to SRI K.VENUMADHAV, Advocate IOPUC] 3. Two CD Copies SA BSR YV

HIGH COURT

DATED:0711112024

ORDER

WP.No.14928 of 2022

1i: L4
v
&> s t
c
t- s* I
(-
Go (t.
tc
\ g-
t
c H s\r

¶51

DISMISSING THE W.P

¶52

AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS.

¶53

Gcodur W, dr"'r

Preethi Bai v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Preethi Bai v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bokkala Bapu Vs State of Tg,Prl.Scy,Revenue,Hyd,and 3

Keshav Rao Pillai, Secunderabad Vs Prl Secy, Revenue Dept, Hyd and 2 Others

Bandaru Rambabu Reddy Vs v. Karuna

Smt. Chandra Bhaga Bai, Vs The Commissioner

Yadlapalli Virein Kumar Vs The State of Telangana

Sudhaveni Latha Vs The State of Telangana