Writ petition seeking a direction to register an FIR on the petitioner's complaint was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to avail remedies available under law; no costs. The Court decided nothing on the merits and no proposition of general application arises.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32e6 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO:'1465 OF 2024
Between:
Medi Ravi, S/o Bhumaiah Aged about 35 Yrs, Occ Software Engineer R/o Penugadapa Village, Bodhan Mandal, Nizamabad District
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in not registering FIR on the complaint of petitioner dt.2111012022 by following thejudgment of Lalita Kumari Vs Governrnent of Uttar Pradesh and Ors against is illegal and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to register FIR on the complaint of petitioner dL2111012022 by following the judgment of Lalitha Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others. lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section'15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stat€d in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to direct the 2nd respondent to register FIR on the complaint ofpetitioner dt.2111012022 by following thejudgment of Lalitha Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and otters,pending disposal of the writpetition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI CH. LAKSHMAN REPRESENTING FOR
SRI S. RAMA MOHAN RAO
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 3: ASST. GP FOR HOI,IE Counsel for the Respondent No.4: - - - - The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICEC.V.BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITIONNo. L465of2O24
ORDER:
Sri Ch.Lakshman,Iearned counsel represer-rting Sri S.Rama MohanRao, learned counsel appearingfor the petitioner requests the Courtto permit the petitioner to withdraw this writpetition with aliberty to avail the remedies asavailableunder law.
Permission as soughtfor is accorded.
Accordingly, the writpetition isdismissedas
withdrawn bygranting liberfyas prayed for. No costs'
As a sequel, themiscellaneous petitions pending,if
any, shall standclosed.
SD/-B. SARASWATHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
/ffRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
\
To, 1. One CC to SRI S.RAMA MOHAN RAO, Advocate IOPUC] 2. iil cc.io cp f onHoME,High Court for the St,teof TelanganalouTl 3. Two CD Copies
BN GJP
€
1!
\
ll
HIGH COURT
DATED:0810212024
( oe THE s14 14:
(<(
,Ji)
1 1 t4t,P 2024
OrsPA rc,1Ecl ,,)/
ORDER
WP.No.1465 of 2024
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WTHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
I
@q*
Medi Ravi
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Home Department
The Commissioner of Police, Nizamabad Commissionerate
The Station House Officer, Bodan Rural Police Station
Medi Lakshman
C.V. Bhaskar Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
