Petitioner sought withdrawal of a writ petition and miscellaneous application filed under Article 226 and Section 151 CPC challenging police non-registration of FIR.
Permission granted to withdraw the writ petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I---
'[ 31831
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THESTATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE SEVENTHDAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
,i THE HONOU RABLE SRI JUSTICEB. VIJAYSEN REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 13010OF 2024
Between:
Golla Srinivas, S/o: Late Sriramulu,Aged about 36 years, Occ Business,Rl/o. Flat No. Fl, South NCL,PadmavathiApartment, Suchitra, Quthubullapur lvlandal, Medchal MalkajgiriDistrcit
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Ar.ticle 226 of theConstitutionof India praying that in the circumstances stated. in theaffidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an aDpropriate Writ, Order. directionmore particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaringthe actionof the respondent no.2 in not : registering or inquiring into the complaint dt:12.04.2024 vide acknowledgement no. CyAlpenOltZOqiUOOlOS againstthe action of Respondent no.3 as illegal and arbitrary and conseQuentlydir:ect the Respondent no.2 to take actionupon the complaint dt 12i:04.2024 filedby the petitionervide acknowledgementno. cyB/pBADt12}424tgpZqg byenquiring into and registeringan FIR or any other action asper law.
lA NO: 1 OF 2024 f,:
i
petition unde.grsection 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in supportof the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondentno.Z totake action upon the comptaint dt: 1210412024filed
by the petitioner vide acknowledgement no. CYB/PBADI120424100705 by enquiring into and registering an FIR or any other action as per law.
Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s. MALLELA SUCHITRA
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 & 2: ASST. GP FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent No.3: - - - -
The Court made the following: ORDER
i.
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.l30l0 OF 2024
ORDER: (ORAL)
Mrs. Suchitra Mallela, learned counsel for the petitioner,
seeks the permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition and
to that etfbct she has made an endorsement on the case bundle.
No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any,
pending in this writ petition stand closed.
SD/. P. CH.NAGABHUSHAMBA ASSISTANTREGISTRAR G
/TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To, 1. One CC totM/s. MALLELA SUCHITRA, Advocate IQPUC] 2. Two CCsto cpioR-t{orr,rE, nign cotirt for the Stlate of Telangana.[oUT] 3. Two CDCoPies BN
PMK \q/
I
HIGH COURT
D ATED i0710612024
ORDER
WP.No.13010 of 2024
'(.
t
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
GcoY&A .k"
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to permit the withdrawal of a writ petition seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus for registration of FIR by police.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Golla Srinivas
The State of Telangana
Borgubavi Saibabu
B. VIJAYSEN REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
