Dismissed

M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Ltd. v. Jikesh Kumar Mohanthy

Telangana HC3 Jun 2024WP/12159/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed multiple writ petitions filed by Tata companies seeking quashing of a Labour Court order. The Labour Court had allowed workmen to adduce new documents alleging victimization despite the domestic enquiry's validity being upheld. The Court held this was permissible as the submissions pertained to the merits of the misconduct charge.

What did the court decide?

Writ petitions for quashing of Labour Court orders allowing additional evidence are dismissed.

M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures… — Labour and Industrial Disputes | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

[321s ]

¶3

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA^{AT HYDERABAD} (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

MONDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI

¶7

WRIT PETITION Nos. 10224.10216. 5868, 11092.11093. 11094. 11095 11096 11100 11101 11103 11104 11105 11106¹¹¹⁰⁷ 11108 12142 12143 12144 12145 12146 12147 12148 12145 12150 12151 12152 12153 '|.2154 12155 12156 12157 12159 12160, 14625.14627.14629 &14630 0F 2021 i i.'

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO: 10 2240F 2021

¶9

Between:

¶10

M/s. Tata Boeing Aerospace Ltd., TSIIC Aerosp ace SEZ, Plot No 1/D, S No. 656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla^(v) lbrahimpatnam^(M) Ranga Reddy District, vTelangana 301510 Represented by its Senior^Manager.Mr. Ravi Kumar Allada

¶11

...PETITIONER

¶12

AND

¶13

S.Venkatesham, S/o Salla Anjaiah Age 28 years, Occ. Associate, Fyo H. No 2-18, Pothanpally, Chegunta Mandal,^Medak Districl' 502247

¶14

...RESP.NDENT

¶15

' Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution^{of lndiapraying that in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit^{filedtherewith,the High Court may be} pleased to issue an order, direction more^particularly one^{in the natureof writ of} Certiorari and to^quash and set aside^{the Common order dated1810212021} passed by the Hon.ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in¹ .A. No. 78 of^{2o21and LA.} No. 79 of 2021 in T.D. No.^{31 of 2019 with regard to additional evidenceand} received documents in the interest^{of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner} will suffer grave hardship and loss.

¶16

¶17

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶18

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavlt filed in support of the petition, the High Court rnay be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Common Order dated 1810212021 in l.A. No.78 of 2021 and l.A. No. 79 of 2O21 in l.D. No. 31 of 2019 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1 , Hyderabad.

¶19

lA NO: 2 OF 2021

¶20

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the proceedings in l.D. No. 31 of 2019 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad, pending disposal of the writ petition.

¶21

lA NO:^'f OF 2024

¶22

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.11.2023 in l-D. No. 31 of 2019 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.

¶23

lA NO: 2 OF 2024

¶24

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11 2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in l.D. No- 31 of 2019 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.

¶25

lA NO: 3 OF 2024

¶26

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed tn W.P. No. 10224 of 2021 until further order.

¶27

¶28

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. T ANAND SUBRAMANIAM

¶29

Counsel for the Respondent: SRI ABID^HUSSAIN

¶30

WRIT PETITION NO: 10216 OF 2021

¶31

Between:

¶32

M/s. Tata Boeing Aerospace Ltd., TSIIC Aerospace SEZ, Plot No.^'1lD, Sy No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (v) lbrahimpatnam (M) Ranga Reddy Diskict, Telangana^- 501510 Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Ravi Kumar Allada

¶33

...PET|TIONER AND

¶34

Sri Mallikarjun Chinnappa Mhanta, S/o Chinnappa, Age 28^years, Occ. Associate, Ryo. Plot No 122, New Grampanchayat, Badangpet Ranga Reddy District^- 500058

¶35

...RESPONDENT

¶36

Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 1810212021 passed by the Honorable Labour Court-'t, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 76 of 2o21and l.A. No. 77 of 2021 in l.D. No. 32 of 2019 with regard to additional evidence and received documents in the interest of^justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss.

¶37

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶38

Petition under Section^'151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Common Order dated 181O212021 in l.A. No. 76 of 2021 and l.A. No. 77 ol 2021 in l.D. No. 32 of 2019 on the file of Honorable Labour Court-'1, Hyderabad.

¶39

lA NO: 2 OF 2021

¶40

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to stay the proceedings in l.D. No. 32 of 2019 on the file of Honorable Labour Court-1 , Hyderabad, pending disposal of the writ^petition.

¶41

¶42

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶43

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedⁱⁿ the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to^pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 2O.11 .2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in l.D.No. 32 of 2019 on the file of Labour Court -^l, Hyderabad.

¶44

lA NO: 2 OF 2024

¶45

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances statedⁱⁿ the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order daled 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 32 of 2019 on the file of Labour Court l, Hyderabad.

¶46

lA NO: 3 OF 2024

¶47

Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to extend the order dated 09.01.2024^passed in W.P. No.^1O216 of 2021 until further order.

¶48

lA NO: 3 OF 2021

¶49

Between:

¶50

Sri Mallikarjun Chinnappa Mhanta, S/o Chinnappa, Age 28^years, Occ.^Associate, R/o. Plot No.122, New Grampanchayat, Badangpet Ranga Reddy District.

¶51

...PETITION ERYRESPONDENT

¶52

AND

¶53

Aditya M/s. Tata Boeing Aerospace Ltd., TSIIC Aerospace SEZ, Plot No. 1/D, Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District,St elanganaNo. 656, -^{Rep. by its Senior Manager, Mr. Ravi Kumar Allada.}

¶54

...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER

¶55

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be^pleased to vacate interim orders passed in W.P.No.1021612021 on 2010412021.

¶56

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI T. ANAND SUBRAMANIAM

¶57

¶58

Counsel forthe Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN

¶59

WRIT PETITION NO: 5868 OF 2021

¶60

Between:

¶61

M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656,^Ad itya Nagar, Adibatla^(V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District^- 501510,^T elangana Represented by its General lvlanager, Mr. Arjun Myne

¶62

...PETITIONER

¶63

AND

¶64

Shiva Kumar H.T., S/o Thippe Swamy, Aged about 29^years, R/o.37-76,77,^Sri Krishna Enclave, Badangpet, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga^{Reddy District, Telangana}

¶65

...RESPONDENT

¶66

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia^prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the^High Court may^be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order^passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 18 of 2021, l.A. No. 143 of 2019, l.A.^No. 71 of 2021 and l.A. No. 150 ot 2O21 in l.D. No. 73 ot 2017 daled^{1810212021 wilh} regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents^and evidence on record in the interest of^justice and equity,^{otherwise the Petitioner} will suffer grave hardship and loss.

¶67

1A NO: 1 OF 2!21

¶68

Petition under Section¹⁵¹ CPC^praying thatⁱⁿ the^{circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in support of the^{petition, the HighCourt maybe pleasedto} suspend the operation of the^{lmpugned Order daled1810212021andstayall} further proceedings in l.A. No. 18 of 2021,1.A.^{No. 143of 20'19,l.A. No. 7'l of} 2021 and l.A. No. 150 ot 2021 in l.D. No.⁷³ of^{2O17on the file of Hon'ble Labour} Court-1 , Hyderabad.

¶69

lA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶70

Petition under Section 151 CPC^{prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in support of the^{petition, the HighCourt may be pleasedto} dispense with the filing of the^{certified copy and xerox copyof the docketorder}

¶71

¶72

dated 20.'1 1 .2023 passed in lD No.73 of 2017 on the^f ile of Labour Court-|, at Hyderabad.

¶73

lA NO: 2 OF 2023

¶74

Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be^pleased to^pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in lD No 73 of 2017 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.

¶75

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶76

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to extend the order dated 2112.2023^passed in W.P. No. 5868 of 2021 until further orders.

¶77

lA NO: 2 OF 2021

¶78

Between:

¶79

Shiva Kumar H.T., S/o Thippe Swam v, Rr/o. 37-76, 77, Sri Krishna Enclave, Badangpet, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana

¶80

...PETITIONERYRESPONDENT

¶81

AND

¶82

M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagal, Adibatla^(V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by its General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne

¶83

.,.RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER

¶84

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to vacate the interim orders daled 25lOBl2O21 in W.P.No. 5868 of 2021 on 3010612021.

¶85

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA

¶86

Counsel forthe Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN

¶87

¶88

WRIT PETITION NO: 11092OF 2021

¶89

Between:

¶90

M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656,^{Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V)} lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District^{- 501510, TelanganaRepresented by} its General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne

¶91

AND

¶92

...PET|TIONER

¶93

Anand Balasaheb Jadhav, S/o. Balasaheb^Umaji Jadhav,^{Aged 30 years, Rl/o. H.No.} 102-2, Old Gram Panchayath, Badangpet, Saroornagar^{(M) Ranga ReddyDistrict,} Telangana^- 5ooo58

¶94

...RESP.NDENT

¶95

Petition under Nlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia^praying that^{in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High^{Court may be} pleased to issue an order, direction more^particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to^quash and set aside^{the Commonorderdated18.02.20201} passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 17 of 2021, l.A. No. 134 ol 2021, and l.A. No. 135 of 2021 in l.D.^No. 7^{of 2018with regard to} amendment of Claim Statement, receiving^additional documents^{and evidence on} record in the interest of^justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer^grave hardship and loss.

¶96

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶97

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying thatⁱⁿ the^{circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in support of the^{petition,the High Court may be pleasedto} suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated^{18.02.2021 in l.A. No. 17 of} 2021, l.A. No. 135 ot 2021 and l.A.^{No. 134 ol 2021 in l.D. No.7 of 2018on the} file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad.

¶98

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶99

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying thatⁱⁿ the^{circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in support of the^{petition,the High Court may be pleasedto} dispense with the filing of Certified^{Copyand Xerox Copyof the docketorder} daled 20.11.2O23 in l.D. No.⁷ of^{2018 on the file of Labour Court- l, Hyderabad.}

¶100

¶101

lA NO: 2 OF 2024

¶102

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedⁱⁿ the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to^pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in l.D. No. 7 of 2O18 on the file of Labour Court^{- I,} Hyderabad.

¶103

lA NO: 3 OF 2024

¶104

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedⁱⁿ the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the^{High Courtnray be pleasedto} extend the order dated 12-01-2024^passed in W.P. No.¹¹⁰⁹² of²⁰²¹ until^further order.

¶105

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA

¶106

Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN

¶107

WRIT PETITION NO: 11093 OF 2021

¶108

Between:

¶109

M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla^(V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Teiangana Represented^by its General Manager, ltr'lr. Arjun Myne

¶110

...PETITIONER

¶111

AND

¶112

Vinod Sahebro More S/o Sahebrao More, Age 27^yearc, Occ:^{Associate,Rl/o.Plot} No 86/P, Shivsainagar, Badangpet, Hyderabad- 500058

¶113

...RES'ONDENT

¶114

Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may^be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order^passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1 , Hyderabad in l.A. No.86 ot 2021, l.A. No. 87 of 2021^{in l.D.No.} 27 oI 2019 daled 1810212021 with regard to receiving additional evidence and documents on record in the interest of^justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss.

¶115

¶116

IA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶117

Petition under Section 151 CPC^{praying that in the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the^{HighCourtmay be pleasedto} suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order daled^{1810212021in l.A. No.86 of} 2021 and l.A. No. 87 ol 2O21in LD. No. 27 of 2019^{on the file of Hon'ble Labour} Court-1, Hyderabad.

¶118

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶119

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that^{in the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in support of the^{petition,the High Court may be pleasedto pass} orders eschewing lhe additional evidence let in^{on 20.11.2023 on behalfof the} Respondent Workman in l.D-No.27 ot 2O19 on^{the file} of^{LabourCourt - l,} Hyderabad.

¶120

lA NO: 2 F 2024

¶121

Petition under Section^'151 CPC^praying that^{in the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the^{High Court may} be^pleasedto dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and^{Xerox Copyof the docket order} daled 20.11.2O23 in l.D. No. 27 of²⁰¹⁹ on the^{file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.}

¶122

lA NO: 3 oF 2024

¶123

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that^{in the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in support^{of the petition, the High Court may be pleasedto} extend the order dated 12.01.2024^{passed in W.P. No. 1 1093of 2021 until further} orders.

¶124

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI^{SHIREENSETHNABARIA}

¶125

Counsel for the Respondent:^{SRIRAVI CHANDRA BEJJARAM}

¶126

¶127

WRIT PETITION NO: 11094 OF 2021

¶128

Between:

¶129

M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by ils General Manager, It4r. Arjtm Myne

¶130

AND

¶131

...PETITIONER

¶132

Sharanappa, S/o Subhash, Aged: about 34^years, Occupation: Associate, R/oH.No-1-103/'1, Sama Street-2, Badangpet, Ranga Reddy District. Telangana.

¶133

...RESPONDENTS

¶134

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to^quash and set aside the Common order^passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 47 of 2021,1.A. No. 101 of 2021,1.A. No. 1OO ot 2021 and lA. No. 48 of 2021 in LD. No. 97 of 2018 dated 18.02.2021 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of^justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardshrp and loss.

¶135

IA O:'l F 2021

¶136

Petrtion under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 18.02.2021 in l.A. No. 47 of 2021,l.A. No. 101 of 2021,1.A. No. 100 of 2021 and l.A. No. 48 of 2021 in l.D. No. 97 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-'l, Hyderabad.

¶137

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶138

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 97 ot 2O18 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.

¶139

¶140

lA NO: 2 OF 2024

¶141

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances statedⁱⁿ the affidavit filed in support of the^{petition,the High Court may be pleasedto pass} orders eschewing the additional evidence^{let in on 20.11.2023on behalf of the} Respondent Workman in l.D. No. 97 of 2018 on the file of^{LabourCourt - l,} Hyderabad.

¶142

lA NO: 3 OF 2024

¶143

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the^{circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the^{High Court maybe pleasedto} extend the order dated 12.01.2024^passed in W.P.^No. 11094^{of 2021 until further} orders.

¶144

lA NO: 2 OF 2021

¶145

Between:

¶146

Sharanappa, S/o Subhash, Aged: 34^years, Occ:^{Associate,R/o. H.No-1-103/1,} Sama Stieet-2, Badangpet,^Ranga Reddy^{District, Telangana,}

¶147

...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT AND

¶148

M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited,^Sy.No.65O Ndltyq^{Nagar, Adibatla (V)} lbrahimpatnam Mandal,'Ranga Reddy District -^{501510, TelanganaRep by its} Generai Manager' Mr' Arjtm Myne

¶149

...REspoNDENTMRrr^pETraoNER

¶150

Petition under Section^'15'l CPC^praying that^{in the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in support^of the^{petition,the High Court maybe pleased to} vacate the order dated: 27 .04.2021^{passedin l.A.No.1 ol 2021 in W.P.No. 1 1094} of 2021 in the interests of Justice.

¶151

Counsel for the Petitioner:^SRI SHIREEN^{SETHNA BARIA}

¶152

Counsel for the Respondent:^SRI RAVI^{CHANDRABEJJARAM}

¶153

)

¶154

WRIT PETITION NO: 11095 OF 202't

¶155

Between:

¶156

M/s- Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District 501510, Telangana Represented by its General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne

¶157

...PETITIONER

¶158

AND

¶159

Lokesha A, S/o Anjainappa, Aged: about 36 years, Occupation Specialist, Rl/o. Plot No. 33, H.No.1-68/4 Badangpet, Ranga Reddy District-500058

¶160

...RESPONDENT

¶161

Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order^passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in 1.A. No.88 ot 2021 and l.A. No. 89 of 2021 in l.D. No. 26 of 2019 dated 1810212021 with regard to receiving additional evidence and documents on record in the interest of^justice and equtty, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss.

¶162

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶163

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order daled 1810212021 in l-A. No.88 of 2021 and l.A. No. 89 o'f 2021 in l.D. No. 26 ot 2O19 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad.

¶164

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶165

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evrdence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in lD No 26 of 2019 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.

¶166

¶167

lA NO: 2 oF 2024

¶168

Petition under Section 151 CPC^{prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in support of^{the petition, the High Court maybe pleasedto} dispense with the filing of Certified Copy^{and Xerox Copyof the docketorder} dated 20.1 1.2023 in l.D. No. 26 of 2019^{on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.}

¶169

lA NO: 3 OF 2024

¶170

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying thatⁱⁿ the^{circumstancesstatedin} the affidavit filed in support of the^{petition, the High Court maybe pleasedto} extend the order dated 12-01-2024^{passed in W.P. No. 11095of 2021 until further} orders.

¶171

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA^BARIA

¶172

Counsel for the Respondent: -

¶173

WR]T PETITION No 11096 0F 2021

¶174

Between:

¶175

M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656,^{Aditya Nagal' Adibatla(V)} lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy^{District -501510, Telangana Representedby} its General Manager, Mr. Arjun^Myne

¶176

...PETITIONER

¶177

AND

¶178

Ganesh Prakash, S/o Prakash^Nane, Aged:^{about 34 years, Occupation. Specialist,} Fl/o Flat No.204, Sri Sai Residency, Turkenj^{al, lbrahimpatnam Mandal Ranga Reddy} District' Telangana'

¶179

...RES'.NDENT

¶180

Petition under^pi.ticle 226 of the^{Constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit^{filed therewith,the High Court may be} pleased to issue an order, direction more^particularly oneⁱⁿ the^{natureof writ of} Certiorari and to^quash and set^{aside the Common order passed by the Hon'ble} Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in^{LA. No.43 ol 2021,1.A. No. 105 of 2021, l.A. No.} 1O4 of 2021 and LA. No. 44 of 2021^{in l.D. No. 95 of 2018dated1810212021wilh} regard to amendment of Claim^{Statement, receiving additional documentsand} evidence on record in the^{interest of justice and equity, otherwisethe Petitioner} will suffer grave hardship and^loss.

¶181

¶182

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶183

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be^pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 1810212021 in LA. No.43 of 2021,l.A. No. 105 of 2021 ,1.A. No. 104 of 2021 and LA. No. 44 of 2021 in l.D. No. 95 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1 , Hyderabad.

¶184

IAN O:1OF 2024

¶185

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be^pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in lD No 95 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.

¶186

lA NO: 2 OF 2024

¶187

Petition under Section 15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order daled 20.11.2O23 in l.D. No. 95 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.

lA NO: 3 OF 2024

lA NO: 2 OF 2021

Between:

Ganesh Prakash, S/o Prakash Nane, RJo. Flat No.204, Sri Sai Residency, Turkenj al, lbrahimpatnam Mandal Ranga Reddy District, Telangana.

¶193

...PETITION EFYRESPONDENT

¶194

AND

¶195

¶196

M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited,^{Sy.No.656,Aditya Nagal' Adibatla (V)} lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy^{Dishict -501510, Telangana Represented by} its General Manager, Mr. Arjun^lr,lyne

¶197

...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER

¶198

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances^{stated in} the affidavit flled in suppo( of the^{petition,the High Court may be pleasedto} vacate the interim order^passed in W.P.No. 1106of 2021 on 27.04.2021.

¶199

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA^BARIA

¶200

Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. ABID^HUSSAIN

¶201

WRIT PETITION NO: 11100 OF 2021

¶202

Between:

¶203

M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar,^Adibatla(V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy Diskict^- 501510,^{Telangana Represented by} its General Manager, Mr. Arjun^Myne

¶204

...PETITIONER

¶205

AND

¶206

C Manjunatha Setty, S/o.C. Mallikarjuna Setty, Aged about 35 years, Rl/o. Triveninagar, Balapur X Roads Meerpet, Rangareddy District

¶207

...RESPONDENT

¶208

Petition under Anicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia^praying lhat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the^High Court^maybe pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to^quash and set aside the Common order^{passed by} the^Honorable Labour Court-l, Hyderabad in LA. No.3of 2021,l.A. No.¹⁴⁶ ot 2021,1.A. No.¹⁴⁷ of 2021 and l.A. No.4 of 2021 in l.D. No. 76 ot 2017 daled^{1810212021with regard} to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and^evidence on record in the interest of^justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner^will suffer grave hardship and loss.

¶209

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶210

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances statedⁱⁿ the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the^{High Court may be pleasedto} suspend the operation of the Impugned Order dated^{18.02.2021 in l.A. No. 3 of}

¶211

¶212

2021, l.A.No.4 of 2019, LA. No. 146 of 2021,l.A No. 147 of 2021 in LD. No.76of 2017 on the file of Honorable Labour Court-l , Hyderabad.

¶213

lA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶214

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to dispense with the filing of the certified copy and xerox copy of the docket order dated 20.11.2023 passed in lD No.76 of 2017 on the file of Labour Court-|, at Hyderabad.

¶215

lA NO: 2 OF 2023

¶216

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedⁱⁿ the affidavit filed in support of the^pelition, the High Court may be^pleased to^pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20j1.2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in lD No 76 of 2O17 on the file of Labour Court -^I, Hyderabad.

¶217

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶218

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedⁱⁿ the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to extend the order dated 21 .122023^passed in W.P. No.^11'100 of 2021 until further orders.

¶219

lA NO: 2 OF 2021

¶220

Between:

¶221

C Manjunatha Setty, S/o.C. Mallikarjuna Setty, R/o. Triveninagar, Balapur X^Roads Meerpet, Rangareddy District.

¶222

AND

¶223

...PET|IONER/RESPONDENT

¶224

M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla^(V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Rep. by^its General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne

¶225

...RESPONDENTM/RIT PETITIONER

¶226

¶227

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances^{stated in} the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court^may be^pleasedto vacate the order dated: 2710412021^passed in l.A.No.¹ of^2O21 in W.P.No.¹¹¹⁰⁰ ol 2021 in the interests of Justice.

¶228

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA

¶229

Counsel for the Respondent: SRI RAVI CHANDRA BEJJARAM

¶230

WRIT PETITION NO: 11101OF 2021

¶231

Between:

¶232

M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla^(V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented^by its General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne

¶233

...PET|TTONER AND

¶234

Manish Kumar, S/o Munshilal Choudhari R/o H.No. 6-801111, SLNS Colony, Balapur X Roads, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana^- 500053

¶235

...RES,ONDENT

¶236

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indla praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in lhe nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order^passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 45 ot 2021,1.A. No. 103 of 2021, l.A.^No. 1O2 of 2021 and l.A. No. 46 of 2021 in l.D. No. 96 of 2018 dated^18.O2.2O21 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents^and evidence on record in the interest of^justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss.

¶237

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶238

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances^{stated in} the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleasedto suspend the operation of the Impugned Order daled 18.02.2021^{in l.A. No. 45 of} 2021,1.A. No. 103 of 2021,1.A. No. 102 of^2O21 and l.A. No.⁴⁶ of^{2021 in l.D. No.} 96 of 20'18 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad.

¶239

lri

¶240

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶241

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedⁱⁿ the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court^{may be pleasedto} dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy^of the^{docket order} dated 20.1 1.2023 in l.D. No. 96 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court^{- l,} Hyderabad.

¶242

lA NO: 2 OF 2024

¶243

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances statedⁱⁿ the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court^{maybe pleasedto pass} orders eschewing the additional evidence^{let in on 20.11.2023on behalfof the} Respondent Workman in l.D. No. 96 of 2018 on the^{file of LabourCourt - l,} Hyderabad.

¶244

lA NO: 3 oF 2024

¶245

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances^{stated in} the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High^{Court may be pleasedto} extend the order dated 12-01-2024^passedin W.P. No.^{1'l 101of 202'luntil further} order.

¶246

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA^BARIA

¶247

Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. ABID^HUSSAIN

¶248

WRIT PETITION NO: 11'103 OF 2021

¶249

Between:

¶250

M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya^{Nagql, Adibatla (V)} lbrahimpatnam lvlandal, Ranga Reddy District^{-501510, Telangana Representedby} its General Manager, Ivlr. Arjun lt/yne

¶251

...PETITIONER

¶252

AND

¶253

Dibyapratap Mohanta, S/o Birendra Mohanta Age 23^years, Occ.Associate,^{R/o H.} No 6-i 1-9/A, Annapurna nagar Colony, Badangpet, Hyderabad-⁵⁰⁰⁰⁵⁸

¶254

...RESPONDENT

¶255

Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the alfidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be

¶256

¶257

pleased to issue an order, direction more^{particularly one in the natureof writ of} certiorari and to^{quash and set asidethe commonorder dated 18.02.202'1passed} by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1,^{Hyderabad in l.A. No. 84 of 2021andl A No 85 of} 2021 in LD. No. 28 oI^{2019with regard to additional evidence and received} documents in the interest^{of justice and equity,otherwise the Petitionerwill suffer} grave hardship and loss.

¶258

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶259

Petition under Section 151^{CPC praying that in the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in support^{of the petition,the High Courl may be pleasedto} suspend the operation^{of the lmpugned Order dated18.02.2021in l.A. No' 84 of} 2021 and l.A. No. 85^{of 2021 in 1.D. No. 28 ot 2019 on the file of Hon'ble Labour} Court-1, Hyderabad.

¶260

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶261

Petition under Section^{151 CPC praying that in the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in support^{of the petition,the High Court maybe pleased to pass} orders eschewing the^{additional evidencelet in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the} Respondent Workman in^{lD No 28 of 2019 on the file of Labour Court - l,} Hyderabad

¶262

IANO:2 OF 2024

¶263

Petition under section¹ 51^{CPC praying that in the circumslancesstated in} the affidavit filed^{in support of the petition,the High Court may be pleasedto} dispense with the^{filingof certifiedcopy and Xerox Copy of the docketorder} daled 20.11.2023 in l.D.^{No. 28 of 2019 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad'}

¶264

lA NO: 3 OF 2024

¶265

Petition under section^{151 cPC praying that in the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in support^{of the petition,the High Court may be pleasedto} extend the order dated^{12.01 .2024 passedin w.P. No. 1 1 103of 2021 untilfurther} order.

lA NO: 2 OF 2021

Between

Dibyapratap S/o Birendra Mohanta,Rl/o H. No 6-1 1-9/A, Annapurna Nagar Colony, Badangpet, ^/ohanta, Hyderabad- 500058

¶270

...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT AND

¶271

M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District -501510, Telangana Represented by its General Manager' Mr' Arjun Myne

¶272

...RESpoNDENT/vlrRrr^pETrroNER

¶273

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 2510812021 in W.P.No. 1^'l 103 of 2021 on 2710412021.

¶274

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA

¶275

Counsel forthe Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN

¶276

WRIT PETITION NO: 11104 OF 2021

¶277

Between:

¶278

M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy Diskict - 501510, Telangana Represented by its General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne

¶279

...PET|T|ONER AND

¶280

Naresha, S/_o _ Nagireddy, Aged about 33 years, Rl/o. H.No.1-136, Badanget, Saroornaga(M) Ranga Reddy District

¶281

...RESPONDENTS

¶282

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1 , Hyderabad in l.A. No. 1 ot 2021, l.A. No. 149 of 2019, l.A. No. 148 ot 2021 and l.A. No.2 ot 2021 in LD. No. 75 o'f 2017 dated 1810212O21 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, olherwise the petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss.

¶283

¶284

lA NO: 1 oF 2021

¶285

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that^{in the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in support^{of the petition, the High Court may be pleasedto} suspend the operation of the lmpugned^{Orderdated 18.02.2021in l.A. No. 'l of} 2021,l.A. No. 149 of 2019,1.A.^{No.148 of 2021 and l.A. No.2 of 2021 in LD. No.} 75 of 2017 dated 18.02.2021 on the^{file of Hon'ble Labour Cou(-1,Hyderabad.}

¶286

lA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶287

Pelition under Section 151 CPC^{prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in support^{of the petition, the High Court may be pleasedto} dispense with the filing of the certified^{copyand xerox copy of the docket order} dated 20.11.2023^passed in lD^{No.75of 2017 on the file of Labour Courf l, at} Hyderabad.

¶288

lA NO: 2 OF 2023

¶289

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that^{in the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in support of the^{petition, the High Court may be pleasedto pass} orders eschewing the additional^{evidencelet in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the} Respondent Workman in lD No⁷⁵ of^{2017 on the file of Labour Court - l,} Hyderabad.

¶290

tA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶291

Petition under Section 151 CPC^{prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in support^{of the petition,the High Court may be pleasedto} extend the order dated 21.12.2023^{passedin W.P. No. 11104 of 2021 until further} orders.

¶292

lA NO: 2 OF 2021

¶293

Between:

¶294

Naresha, S/o Nagireddy,^Ryo. H.No.1-136,^{Badanget, Saroornagar(M) Ranga Reddy} District

¶295

...pETrrroNER/REspoNDENT

¶296

AND

¶297

¶298

M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501 510, Telangana Represented by its General ltlanager, Mr. Arjun Myne

¶299

...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER

¶300

¶301

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA

¶302

Counsel forthe Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN

¶303

WRIT PETITION NO: 11105 OF 2021

¶304

Between:

¶305

M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy Diskict - 501510, Telangana Represented by its General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne

¶306

...PETITIONER AND

¶307

Dileep, S/o Radha Krishnaiah, Aged: about 33 years, Occupation. Specialist, Rl/o. H.No.1-76, Neelam Yadagiri Building, Badangpet Ranga Reddy District, Telangana - 500058

¶308

...RESPONDENT

¶309

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 18.O2.2O2O1 passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-|, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 51 of 2021, l.A. No. 97 of 2021,l.A. No. 96 of 2021 and l.A. No. 52 ot 2021 in l.D. No. 99 of 2018 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of^justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss.

¶310

lA NO: 'l OF 2021

¶311

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in supporl of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order daled 18.02.2021 in LA. No. 51 of

¶312

¶313

2021,1.A. No.97of 2021,1.A. No.96of^{2021 and l.A.No.52of2021 inl.D.No.} 99 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble^{Labour Court-1, Hyderabad}

¶314

IA NO: 2024

¶315

Petition under Section 151 CPC^{prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in support of the^{petition,the High Courtmay be pleasedto pass} orders eschewing the additional evidence^{let in on 20.11 .2023 on behalfof the} Respondent Workman in lD No 99^{of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l,} Hyderabad.

¶316

. lA NO: 2OF 2024

¶317

Petition under Section¹ 51 CPC^praying that^{in the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in support of the^{petition,the High Courtmaybe pleasedto} dispense with the filing of Certified Copy^{and Xerox Copyof the docket order} daled 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 99 of^{2018on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.}

¶318

lA NO: 3 OF 2024

¶319

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that^{in the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in support of^{the petition,the High Court may be pleasedto} extend the order dated 12.01.2024^{passed in W.P. No. 1 1 105 of 2021 until further} orders.

¶320

IA NO: 20F 2021

¶321

Between:

¶322

Dileeo. S/o Radha Krishnaiah, Aqed:^{about 33 years,Occupation. Specialist,Fl/o.} H.No:i-76, Neelam Yadagiri Building,^{Badangpet Ranga Reddy District,Telangana -} 500058

¶323

...PETITIONERvRESPONDENT AND

¶324

M/s. Tata Advanced Systems^{Limited, Sy.No.656,AdityaNagar, Adibatla (V)} lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District^{- 501510, Telangana Represented by} its General Manager' Mr' Arjun Myne ...RES'.NDENTMR.r^pETrroNER

¶325

Petition under Section 151 CPC^{prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in support of^{the petition,the High Courtmaybe pleasedto}

¶326

¶327

vacate the order dated: 2710412021 passed in l.A.No. 1 o'f 2021 in W.P.No. '1 1 105 of 2021 in the interests of Justice.

¶328

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA

¶329

Counsel forthe Respondent: SRI RAVI CHANDRA BEJJARAM

¶330

WRIT PETITION NO: 11106 OF 2021

¶331

Between:

¶332

M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy. No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla^(V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana. Represented by its General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne.

¶333

...PETTT|ONER AND

¶334

Srihari Kandregula S/o. Venkata Ramana, aged about 33^{years, Rl/o.} C.No.:P. Damodar Reddy, Organizing Secretary, INTUC, AP & Telangana Branch, 3-5-1089, 3'Floor, Narayanguda, Hyderabad - 500029.

¶335

...RES'ONDENT

¶336

Pelition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari and quash and set aside the Common order^passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-|, Hyderabad in 1.A.No.117 of 2021, and |.A.No.116 of 2021 in^lD No.84 of 2018 dated 18.02.2021 with regard to receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of^justice and equity, otherwise,the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship.

¶337

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶338

Petition under Section^'151 CPC praying for the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, pending disposal of the^present writ^petition, the Hon'ble High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 18.O2.2O21 in 1.A.No.117 of 2O21 and 1.A.No.116 of 2021 in l.D.No.84 of 2018 on the file of the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad.

¶339

lA NO: I OF 2024

¶340

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to^pass

¶341

¶342

orders eschewing^{the additional evidencelet in on 2o11 -2023 on behalfof the} RespondentWorkmaninlDNoE4of2OlEonthefileofLabourCourt-|, Hyderabad.

¶343

IA NOi 2OF 2024

¶344

Petition under section^{151 CPC prayingthat in the clrcumstances statedin} the affidavit filed^{in supportof the petition, the High court may be pleased to} dispense with the filing^{of certifiedcopy and Xerox copy of the docketorder} daled 20.11.2023^{in l.D. No.84 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad'}

¶345

IANO:3O F 24

¶346

Petition under section^{151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed^{in supportof the petition, the High court may be pleased to} extend the order dated^{12-01-2024 passed in w.P.No.11 106 of 2021 until further} orders.

¶347

Counsel for the Petitioner:^{SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA}

¶348

Counsel for the Respondent:^--

¶349

WRIT PETITION^{NO: 11107 OF 2021}

¶350

Between:

¶351

M/s. Tata Advanced^{Systems Limited,Sy.No-.656,} ^Aditya^{Nagar,Adibatla} ,(V) ibrahimoatnam Mandal,^{RangaReddy District- 501 510, Telangana Represente6 Dy} its General Manager,^{Mr.Arjun MYne}

¶352

i AND

¶353

Usr,Tl&!:','ifihl;"''"?1,%3j,;llll*&''"xin"3:/"&'ibo"f;loi,'"83[8iHil[ Gopalapuram, Vishakapatnam-S3O027

¶354

PetitionunderArticle226oftheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstances stated^{in the affidavitfiledtherewith, the High courtmay be} pleased to issue an order, direction^{moreparticularlyone in the nature of writ of} certiorari and to^{quash and set asidethe commonorder dated 18.02.2021passed} bythe Hon'ble Labour^{Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No 72of2021 andlA No 73 of} 2021 in l.D. No.⁴⁴ of^{2O1gwithregardto additional evidence andreceived}

¶355

¶356

documents in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss.

¶357

IAN oF 2021

¶358

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order daled 18.02.2021 in l.A. No. 72 of 2021 and l.A. No. 73 ot 2021 in l.D. No. 44 ol 2O19 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad.

¶359

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶360

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.11.2O23 in I.D. No. 44 ol 2019 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.

¶361

lA NO: 2 OF 2024

¶362

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in l.D. No. 44 ot 2019 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.

¶363

lA NO: 3 OF 2024

¶364

Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed rn support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 12.01.2024 in W.P. No. 11107 of 2021 until further order.

¶365

lA NO: 2 OF 2021

¶366

Between:

¶367

Naresh Chilakalapalli, s/o ch. Mangayyaa, Fl/o. H.No.58-18-23/3, lndira Priyadarshani Colony Near NAD Road, Butchirajupalem Gopalapuram, Visakhapatnam.

¶368

...PETITIONE R/RESPONDENT

¶369

¶370

AND

¶371

Mis. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla^(V) Ibrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana Rep. by its^General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne

¶372

...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER

¶373

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to vacate interim orders passed in W.P.No.1110712021 on 2710412021.

¶374

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA

¶375

Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. ABIO HUSSAIN

¶376

WRIT PETITION NO: 11108 OF 2021

¶377

Between:

¶378

M/s. Tata Advanced Systems Limited, Sy.No.656, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla^(V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by its General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne

¶379

i aro

¶380

...PETITIONER

¶381

R. Ambareesha, S/o Ramakrishna ppa, aged about 25 years, Occupation Specialist, Rl/o Flat No.'12, Varalaxminagar, Badangpet, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana^- 500058

¶382

...RESPONDENT

¶383

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to^quash and set aside the Common order^passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-'l, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 39 of 2021,1.A. No. 109 of 2021, l.A. No. 108 of 2021 and l.A. No. 40 of 2021 in l.D. No. 93 of 2018 dated 1810212021 wilh regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additlonal documents and evidence on record in the interest of^justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss.

¶384

lA NO: I OF 2021

¶385

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedⁱⁿ the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleasedto

¶386

¶387

suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order daled 18.02.2021 in^l.A. No. 39 of 2021,1.A. No. 109 of 2021 ,1.A. No. 108 ot 2021 and l.A. No.40 of 2021 in l.D.No. 93 of 2018 daled 18.02.2021 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad.

¶388

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶389

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedⁱⁿ the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court^may be^pleasedto dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order daled 2O.11.2023 in l.D. No. 93 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court^- l, Hyderabad.

¶390

lA NO: 2 OF 2024

¶391

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedⁱⁿ the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court^{may be pleasedto pass} orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on^{20.11.2023 on behalfof the} Respondent Workman in l.D. No. 93 of 2018 on the file of^{LabourCourt - l,} Hyderabad.

¶392

lA NO: 3 OF 2024

¶393

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances^{stated in} the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court^{may be pleasedto} extend the order dated 12-01-2024^passed in W.P. No.^{11108 of 2021 until further} orders.

¶394

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA

¶395

Counsel for the Respondent: SRI RAVI CHANDRA BEJJARAM

¶396

WRIT PETITION NO: 12142 OF 2021

¶397

Between:

¶398

M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aero structures Limited, Sy.No.255,^AdityaNagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District^{- 501510, Telangana} Represented by its senior Manager' Mr' Nitin kumar

...pETlroNER

AND

Gudu Sahu, S/o Sarat Kumar Sahu, Aged: about³⁴ ears, Occ: Ex.Associate R/o C/o: P. Damodar Reddy, Organizing Secretary,^INTU AP and Telangana Branch, Ic,v 3-5-1089,3rd floor, Narayanguda, Hyderabad^{- 50002}

¶403

,..RESPONDENT

¶404

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances staled in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 1810212O21^passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No.37 of 2021,l.A. No. 111 of 2021,1.A. No. 110 ot 2O21 and l.A. No. 38 ot 2021 in l.D. No. 88 of 2018 dated 18.02.2021 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of^justice and equity, otherwise the Pelitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss.

¶405

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶406

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 18.02.2021 in l.A. No.37 of 2021 ,1.A. No. 111 of 2021,1.A. No. 110 of 2021 and l.A. No. 38 of 2021 in l.D. No. 88 of 20'18 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad.

¶407

lA NO: I OF 24

¶408

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleasedto dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order daled 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 88 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court^{- l,} Hyderabad.

¶409

lA NO: 2 OF 2024

¶410

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedⁱⁿ the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court^may be^{pleasedto pass} orders eschewing the additional evidence letⁱⁿ on 20.11.2023^{on behalfof the} Respondent Workman in l.D. No. 88 of 2018 on^{the file of Labour Court - l,} Hyderabad.

¶411

¶412

lA NO: 3 OF 2024

¶413

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to extend the order dated 12-01-2024^passed in W.P. No. 12142 ot 2021 until further orders.

¶414

lA NO: 2 OF 2021

¶415

Between:

¶416

Gudu Sahu, S/o Sarat Kumar Sahu, Fl/o C/o: P. Damodqr Reddy,^Organizing Secretary, INTUC, AP and Telangana Branch, 3-5-1089, 3'o^{floor, Narayanguda,} Hyderabad.

¶417

...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT AND i'

¶418

M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya^Nagar, Adibatla^(V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana^Represented bv its senior Manager' Mr' Nitin kumar

¶419

...RESpoNDENT/wRrr^pETrroNER

¶420

Petition under Section 15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances statedⁱⁿ the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleasedto vacate interim orders passed in W.P.No.1214212021 on 0110612021.

¶421

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA

¶422

Counsel forthe Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN

¶423

WRIT PETITION NO:'12143 OF 2021

¶424

Between:

¶425

M/s Tata Lockheed Martin Aero structures Limited, Sy No.255, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin kumar

¶426

...PETITlONER

¶427

AND

¶428

J-Anjaneyulu, S/o.Ramachendra Mahadeva, Aged 29^years Occ: Specialist^{Rl/o Flat} No.12, Varalaxminagar, Badangpet, Rangareddy District, Telangana

¶429

...RESPONDENT

¶430

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be

¶431

¶432

pleased to issue an order, direction more^{particularly one in the nature of writ of} Certiorari and to^quash and^{set aside the Commonorder passedby the Honorable} Labour Court-1 , Hyderabad^{in l.A. No. 41 of 2021,1.A. No. 107 of 2021'IA. No.} 1OG of 2021 and l.A. No. 42 of 2021^{in l.D. No. 94 of 2018dated18.02.2021wilh} regard to amendment of Claim Statement,^{receiving additional documents and} evidence on record in the interest^of .iustice^{and equity, otherwise the Petitioner} will suffer grave hardship and^loss.

¶433

lA NO:^'l OF 2021

¶434

Petition under Section 151 CPC^{prayingthat in the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed in support^{of the petition, the High Court may be pleasedto} dispense with the filing of a^{certified copy of orderin l.A. No. 41 of 2021'l.A.No.} 1O7 of 2021,1.A. No. 106 of 2021^{andl.A. No. 42 of 2021 in l.D. No. 94 of 2018on} the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1,^Hyderabad.

¶435

lA NO: 2 OF 2021

¶436

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that^{in the circumstances statedin} -the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the^{lmpugnedOrder dated 181O212021passed in l.A.No.} '41 ot 2021,1.A. No.¹⁰⁷ of^{2021,1.A.No. 106 of 2021and l.A. No. 42 ot 2021 in} l.D. No. 94 of 2018 on the file^{of Hon'ble Labour Court-1,Hyderabad.}

¶437

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶438

Petition under Section 151 CPC^{praying that in the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed in support^{of the petition,the High Court may be pleasedto} dispense with the filing of^{CertifiedCopy and XeroxCopyof the docket order} dated 20.11.2023 in l.D.^{No.94 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad}

¶439

lA NO: 2 OF 2024

¶440

Petition under Section 151 CPC^{prayingthat in the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filedⁱⁿ support^{of the petition,the High Court may be pleased to pass} orders eschewing the^{additional evidencelet in on 20.11.2023 on behalfof the}

¶441

¶442

Respondent Workman in LD. No. 94 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.

¶443

lA NO: 3 OF 2024

¶444

Petition under Section^'1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed in W.P. No. 12143 of 2021 until further order.

¶445

lA NO: 3 OF 2021

¶446

Between:

¶447

J.Anjaneyulu, S/o.Ramachendra lvlahadeva, Aged: 29 years Occ: Specialist, Fl/o. Flat No.12, Varalaxminagar, Badangpet, Rangareddy District.

¶448

...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT AND i

¶449

M/s Tata Lockheed lrr'lartin Aero structures Limited, Sy No.255, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 50'1510, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin kumar

¶450

r .

¶451

...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETIT]ONER

¶452

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances state_d in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the order dated 01.06.2021 passed in l.A.No.2 ot 2021 in W.P.No.12143 of 2021 in the interests of justice.

¶453

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA

¶454

Counsel for the Respondent: SRI RAVI CHANDRA BEJJARAM

¶455

WRIT PETITION NO: 12144 OF 202'l

¶456

Between:

¶457

M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.2.55, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District -501510, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar

...PETITIONER

AND

lvlohamad Dastagir, S/o Vaheed Miyan^{Jampad,agpdabout 28 years, R/o C/o P.} Damoda!' Reddy, Organizing Secretary,^{INTUC, AP and Telangana Branch, 3-5-} 1089, 3'd floor, Naray-nguda,^{Hyderabad - 500029}

¶462

...RESPONDENT

¶463

Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia^{prayingthat in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit^{filedtherewith, the High Court may be} pleased to issue an order, direction more^particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to^quash and set aside^{the Commonorderdated18102120201} passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-|, Hyderabad in l.A. No.¹¹⁵ of^{2O21, 1.A. No.} 33ot2021,1.A. No. 114 ol^2O21 and^{I.A. No.34ol 2021 in l.D. No.85of2018with} regard to amendment of Claim Statement,^{receivingadditional documents and} evidence on record in the interest of^justice and^{equity, otherwisethe Petitioner} will suffer^grave hardship and loss.

¶464

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶465

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying thatⁱⁿ the^{circumstances stated in} the affidavit filed in support of the^{petition, the High Court maybe pleased to} suspend the operation of the lmpugned^{Order dated 18.02.202'1in l.A. No. 115 of} 2021,1.A. No.33of 2021,1.A. No.^{114ot2021and 1.A.No.34ol2O21 inl.D.No.} 85 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble^{Labour Court-1, Hyderabad.}

¶466

IANO:1OF 2024

¶467

Petition under Section 151 CPC^{prayingthat in the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed in support of^{the petition,the HighCourt maybe pleased to pass} orders eschewing the additional^{evidencelet in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the} Respondent Workman in^{lD No 85 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court-l,} Hyderabad.

¶468

lA NO: 2 OF 2024

¶469

Petition under Section 151 CPC^{prayingthat in the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed in support^{of the petition,the High Court maybe pleased to} dispense with the filing of^{CertifiedCopy and Xerox Copyof the docketorder} daled 2O.1'l .2023 in l.D.^{No. 85 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court- l, Hyderabad.}

¶470

¶471

lA NO: 3 OF 2024

¶472

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedⁱⁿ the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to extend the order dated 12.01 .2024 passed in W.P. No. 12144 ot 2021 until further order.

¶473

lA NO: 2 OF 2021

¶474

Between:

¶475

Mohamad Dastagir, S/o Vaheed Miyan Jampad, Fl/o. C/o. P. Damodar Reddy, organizing s6ii6tirv, iurUc,-Ap 6no reta'ngana Branch, 3-5-1089,^3'd floor, Narayanguda, Hyderabad. i; ...PETITIONEFYRESPONDENT AND t. ir M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.2.55,^Adi tya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District^-501510, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar

¶476

...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER

¶477

Petition under Section^',l51 CPC^praying that in the circumstances statedⁱⁿ the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the^{High Court may be pleased to} vacate interim orders passed in W.P.No.1214412021^{on 01lOOl2021.}

¶478

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA^BARIA

¶479

Counsel forthe Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN

¶480

WRIT PET!TION NO: 12145 OF 2021

¶481

Between:

¶482

M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255,^{Aditya Nagar,} Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District^- 501510, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar i

¶483

...PETITIONER

¶484

AND

¶485

Hemant A Paqare, S/o. Ashok Shivram Pagare, Aged 30^{years, Rl/o.} H No.86^P Shiva Sainagdr, Badangpet, Saroomagar(M), Ranga Reddy District,^Telangana- 500058

¶486

...RESPONDENT

¶487

¶488

Petition under Anicle 226 of the Constitution^{of lndiaprayingthat in the} circumstances stated in the^{affidavitfiledtherewith,the High Court may be} pleased to issue an order, direction more^{particularly one in the nature of writ of} Certiorari and to^quash and^{set astde the Common orderdated 18.02.20201} passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in I.A. No.¹³⁷ of²⁰²¹ ,^{l.A No.} 1,5 of 2021,1.A. No. 136 of 2021^{and l.A. No.16oi 2021ia l.D. No.6 of 2018 with} regard to amendment of^{Claim Statement,receiving additional documentsand} evidence on record in the^{interestof justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner} will suffer grave hardship and^loss.

¶489

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶490

Petition under Section 151 CPC^{praying that in the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in support^{of the petition,the High Court may be pleasedto} suspend the operation of the lmpugned^{Order daled 18.02.2021 in l.A.No.137of} 2021, l.A. No. 15 of 2021,1.A. No.^{136 of 2021 and l.A.No.16of 2021 in l.D. No.6} of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble^{Labour Court-1, Hyderabad.}

¶491

lA NO:^'f OF 2024

¶492

, I P"tition under Section 151 CPC^{praying thatin the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed in support^{of the petition,the High Court may be pleasedto pass} orders eschewing the^{additional evidencelet in on 20.11.2023 on behalfof the} Respondent Workman in^{l.D.No.06 of 2018on the file of Labour Court - l,} Hyderabad. I

¶493

lA NO: 2 OF 2024

¶494

Petition under Section^{151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed in support^{of the petition,the High Court may be pleasedto} dispense with the filing of^{Certified Copyand XeroxCopyof the docket order} dated 20.11.2023 in^{l.D. No.06 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.}

¶495

lA NO: 3 OF 2024

¶496

Petition under Section^{151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed in^{support of the petition,the High Court may be pleasedto}

¶497

¶498

extend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed in W.P. No. 12145 of 2021 until further order.

¶499

lA NO: 2 OF 2021

¶500

Between:

¶501

Hemant A Pagare, S/o. Ashok Shivram Pagare, R/o. H.No. 86 P Shiva Sainagar, Badangpet, Saroomaga(M), Ranga Reddy District, Telangana.

¶502

...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT

¶503

AND

¶504

M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar

¶505

...RESPONDENTM'RIT PETITIONER

¶506

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate interim orders passed in W.P.No.1214512021 on 01.06.2021.

¶507

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA

¶508

Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN

¶509

WRIT PETITION NO: 12146 OF 2021

Between:

...PETITIONER

AND

Nagaraju Mahadeva, S/o Mahadeva, aged about 23 years, RYo Samas Street, Bhishmanagar Colony, Badangpet, Saroornagar Mandal,^{. H.No.1-103/4,} Ranga Reddy District, Telangana

¶515

..RESPONDENT

¶516

Petition under A(icle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the aFfidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 18.02.20201 passed by lhe Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad l.A. No. 1 1 of 2O21,1.A. No. 12

¶517

¶518

of 2021,1.A. No. 140 of 2021 and^{l.A. No.141 of 2021in l.D. No. 93 of 2017 with} regard to amendment of Claim^{Statement, receivingadditional documents and} evidence on record in the interest^{of justice and equity, otherwisethe Petitioner} will suffer grave hardship and loss.

¶519

lA NO: I OF 2021

¶520

Petition under Section 151 CPC^{praying thatin the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed in support^{of the petition, the High Court may be pleasedto} suspend the operation of^{the lmpugnedOrderdated 1810212021 of in l.A. No.11 of} 2021,1.A. No. 12 of 2021,1.A.^{No. 140 of 2021 and l.A. No.'14'lof 2021 in ID.No.} 93 of 2O17 on the file of Hon'ble^{Labour Court-1, Hyderabad.}

¶521

lA NO: I OF 024

¶522

I Petition under Section 151 CPC^{prayingthat in the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filedⁱⁿ support^{of the petition, the HighCourt maybe pleasedto pass} orders eschewing the additional^{evidencelet in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the} Respondent Workman in^{lD No 93 ot 2017 on the file of Labour Court - l,} Hyderabad.

¶523

lA NO: 2 OF 2024

¶524

.. Petition under Section 151 CPC^{praying thatin the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed in support^{of the petition,the High Court maybe pleased to} dispense with the filing of^{CertifiedCopy and Xerox Copy of the docketorder} daled 20.11.2023 in^{l.D. No. 93 of 2017 on the file of Labour Court- l, Hyderabad'}

¶525

IANO 30F 2024

¶526

; I e"tition under Section^{151 CPC praying thatin the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed in^{supportof the petition,the High Court may be pleasedto} extend the order dated^{12-01-2024 passedin w.P. No.12146of 2021 until further} order.

¶527

Counsel for the Petitioner:^{SRISHIREEN SETHNA BARIA}

¶528

Counsel for the Respondent:^{SRI RAVI CHANDRABEJJARAM}

¶529

¶530

WRIT PETITION NO: 12147 OF 2021

¶531

Between:

¶532

M/s- Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 5015'10, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, lr/r. Nitin Kumar

¶533

...PETITIONER :

¶534

AND

¶535

V. Shashanka, S/o Verrabhadre Gowda S, aged about 30 years, Fl/o C/o. P- DaqoQg,r Reddy, Organizing Secretary, INTUC, AP and Telangana Branch, 3-51089, 3'' floor. Narayanguda, Hyderabad - 500029

¶536

...RES'ONDENT

¶537

Petition under Artide 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in :the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court mayl be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 18.02.2021 passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 125 ol 2021, l.A. No. 27 of 2021, l.A. No. 124 of 2021 and l.A. No. 28 of 2O21 in l.D. No. 16 of 2018 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents^'and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss.

¶538

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶539

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased, to rl suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 18.02.2021 in l.A. No. 125 of 2021,l.A. No. 27 of 2021,l.A. No. 124 of 2O21 and l.A. No. 28 of 2021 in l.D. No. 1 6 of 201 8 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1 , Hyderabad. ] i

¶540

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶541

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased, to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.11.2023 in l.D. No.^'16 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.

¶542

¶543

lA NO: 2 OF 2024

¶544

Petition under Section 151 CPC^{prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in support of the^{petition,the High Court may be pleasedto pass} orders eschewing the additional evidence^{let in on 20.11.2023 on behalfof the} Respondent Workman in l.D.^{No. 16 of 2018 on the file of LabourCourt - l,} Hyderabad.

¶545

lA NO: 3 OF 2024

¶546

Petition under Section 151 CPC^{prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in support of the^{petition,the HighCourtmaybe pleasedto} extend the order dated 12-01-2024^{passed in W.P. No. 12147 of 2021 until fu(her} order.

¶547

lA NO: 2 OF 2021

¶548

Between:

¶549

V. Shashanka, S/o Verrabhadre^{Gowda S, R/o C/o. P. Damod.arReddy, Organizing} Secretary, INTUC, AP and Telangana^{Branch, 3-5-1089, 3'" floor, Narayanguda,} Hyderabad.

¶550

...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT AND

¶551

M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin^{AerostructuresLimited, Sy.No.255' Aditya Nagar,} Adibatla^(V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal,^{Ranga Reddy District - 501510'Telangana} Represenieil by its Senior Manager,^{Mr. Nitin Kumar}

¶552

,..RESPONDENTM/RIT PETITIONER

¶553

Petition under Section 151 CPC^{prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in support^{of the petition,the HighCourt maybe pleasedto} vacate interim orders^{passedin W.P.No.1214712021 on O1lOOl2021.}

¶554

Counsel for the Petitioner:^{SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA}

¶555

Counsel for the Respondent:^{Mr. ABID HUSSAIN}

¶556

-10

¶557

WRIT PETITION NO: 12148 OF 2021

Between:

...PETITIONER

AND

Sangamesh, S/o lvlanohar, Aged about 30 years, R/o C/o. P. Damodar Reddy, Organizing Secretary, INTUC, AP and Telangana Branch, 3-5-1089, 3rd floor, Narayanguda' Hyderabad - 500029

¶563

...RE''.NDENT

¶564

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in lhe affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may, be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 18102120201 passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 121 of 2021, l.A.,No. 29 of 2021,l.A. No. 120 of 2021 and 1.A. No. 30 of 2021 in l.D. No. 82 of 2018 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documlnts and evidence on record in the interest of^justice and equity, ottrerwise f the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss.

¶565

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶566

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 1810212021 passed in l.A. No. 121 of 2021,1.A. No. 29 of 2021,1.A. No. 120 of 2021 and l.A. No. 30 oI 2O21 in l.D. No. 82 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad.

¶567

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶568

Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the Respondent Workman in lD No 82 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court -t, Hyderabad.

¶569

¶570

lA NO: 2 OF 2024

¶571

;^r Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances statedⁱⁿ the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the^{High Court maybe pleasedto} dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.1 1 .2023 in LD. No. 82 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.

¶572

lA NO: 3 OF 2024

¶573

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleasedto extend the order dated 12-01-2024^passed in W.P. No.¹²¹⁴⁸ of 2021 until^fu(her orders.

¶574

lA NO: 2 OF 2021

¶575

Between:

¶576

'sangamesh, S/o Manohar, R/o C/o. P. Darlgdar Reddy, Organizing Secretary, INTUC, AP and Telangana Branch, 3-5-1089, 3'" floor, Narayanguda,^Hyderabad.

¶577

... PETITION ER/RESPONDENT AND

¶578

M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana Rep. by^its senior Manager' Mr' Nitin Kumar

¶579

...REspoNDENT/wRrr ,ETITT'NER

¶580

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances statedⁱⁿ the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court^may be^pleasedto vacate interim orders^passed in^{W.P.No.1214812O21} on01.06.2021.

¶581

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA^BARIA

¶582

Counsel forthe Respondent: Mr. ABID^HUSSAIN

¶583

WRIT PETITION NO: 12149 OF 2021

¶584

Between:

¶585

M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Ltd., Sy.No.255,^AdityaNa gar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District^- 501510, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar

¶586

..,PETITIONER

¶587

AND

¶588

Sri Venkatesh Talari, S/o. T. Ramesh, Aged 28^{years, Ri/o. DamodarReddy,} Organising Secretary,H.No. 3-5-1089, 3'" Floor, Narayanguda,^{Hyderabad- 500029}

¶589

...RESPONDENTS

¶590

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia^praying that^{in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith,^{the High Court maybe} pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common^{order dated18.O2.2O2O1} passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-|, Hyderabad in LA. No.¹³³ of 2021,^l.A.No. 19 of 2021 , 1.A. No. 132 of 2021 and l.A. No.20 of^{2O21 in LD. No. 12 of 2018with} regard to amendment of Claim Statement,^{receivingadditional documentsand} evidence on record in the interest of^justice and^{equity, otherwisethe Petitioner} will suffer grave hardship and loss.

¶591

IANO:1O 2021

¶592

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the^{circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the^{High Court may be pleasedto} suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order daled^{18.02.2O21in l.A- No. 133of} 2021,1.A. No. 19 of 2021,1-A. No. 132 ot 2021 and^{l.A. No.20of 2021 in l.D} No 12 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad

¶593

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶594

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances^statedin the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court^{may be pleasedto pass} orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on^{20.11.2023 on behalfof the} Respondent Workman in lD No 12 of 2018 on the^file of^{Labour Court -l,} Hyderabad.

¶595

lA NO: 2 OF 2024

¶596

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances^{stated in} the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High^{Courtmaybe pleased,to} dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket older daled 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 12 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.

¶597

¶598

lA NO: 3 OF 2024

¶599

Petition under Section 151 CPC^{praying that in the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in support^{of the petition, the High Court may be pleasedto} extend the order dated 12.01.2024^{passedin W.P No.12149of 2021 until further} orders.

¶600

lA NO: 2 OF 202'l

¶601

Between:

¶602

'Sri VenkateSh Talari, S/o. T. Ramesh, Aged 28^{years,Ri/o.Damodar Reddy,H.No.} 3-5-1089, 3'd Floor, Narayanguda, Hyderabad^{- 500029} ii ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT

¶603

AND

¶604

...M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures^{Limited,Sy.No.255,AdityaNagar,} hdibatla^(V) lbrahimpatnam^{Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510'Telangana} Rep. by iti Senior Manager,^{Mr. Nitin Kumar}

¶605

...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER

¶606

1r Petition under Section 151 CPC^{praying that in the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in support of the^{petition, the High Court may be pleasedto} vacate the order dated: 01.06.2021^{passed in W.P.No.12149oi 2021 in the} :nterests of Justice.

¶607

Gounsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN^SETHNABARIA

¶608

Counsel for the Respondent:^{SRI RAVI CHANDRA BEJJARAM}

¶609

WRIT PETITION NO: 12150 OF 2021

¶610

Between:

¶611

M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures^{Limited,Sy.No.255,Adit} ya Nagar, Adibatla^(V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal,^{Ranga Reddy District - 501510'} Telangana Represenieil by its Senior^{Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar}

¶612

...PETITIONER

¶613

AND

¶614

Khandappa Kasinath, S/o^Kasinath, aoed about 27 vea$. Rl/o C/o P. Damodar Reddy, Organizing Secretary,^INTUC, AF-ino feiangaria Branch,^{3-5-1089,3'd floor,} Narayanguda, Hyderabad^{- 500029}

¶615

..RESPONDENT

¶616

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in: the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and sel aside the Common order dated 18102120201 passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 1 19 of 2021 , l.A. No. 31 ol 2O21 ,l.A No. 118 ot 2021 and I.A No.32of 2021 in l.D. No. 83 of 2018with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, recerving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of^justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss.

¶617

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶618

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be^pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpug ned Order dated 18.02.2021 in l.A. No. 1 I 9 of 2021, l.A. No. 31 of 2021, l.A. No. 118 ot 2021 and l.A. No. 32 of 2O21 in l.D. No 83 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad

¶619

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶620

Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of ithe Respondent Workman in l.D.No.83 ot 2018 on the file of Labour Court'- l, Hyderabad.

¶621

lA NO: 2 OF 2024

¶622

Petilion under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be^pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.1 1.2023 in l.D. No. 83 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad

¶623

lA NO: 3 OF 2024

¶624

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court nray be pleased to

¶625

¶626

extend the order dated 12-01-2024^{passedin W.P. No. 12150of 2021 until further} orders.

¶627

r Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA

¶628

Counsel for the Respondent:^--

¶629

.il

¶630

WRIT PETITION NO: 12151OF 2021

¶631

Between

¶632

M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures^{Ltd, Sy.No.255,AdityaNa} gar, Adibatla (V) Ibrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented byits Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar

¶633

...PETITIONER

¶634

AND

¶635

Ameer Kasheem Bagayat, S/o^{Kasheem Bagayat,Age 2l y.e.ar9,.Occ:Associate,} R/o. H. No 13-173l1fokayukta Colony,^{Badangpet,Ranga Reddy District - 500058}

¶636

...RESPONDENT

¶637

,, r Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution^{of lndiaprayingthat in the} ",I . r'iircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be ,.. l Iliileased to issue an order, direction more^particularly one in the nature of writ^of '-tertiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 18.O2-2O2O1 i:assed^{by the Hon'bleLabour Court-'1, Hyderabadin l.A. No. 57 of 2021,l.A.No.} 58 of 2021 ,1.A. No. 90 ot 2021^{andI.A. No. 91 ot 2O21 in I.D. No. 102 of 2018 with} regard to amendment of Claim^{Statement, receivingadditional documentsand} evidence on record in the interest^{of justiceand equity, otherwisethe Petitioner} will suffer grave hardship and^loss. 't!

¶638

lA NO: { OF 2021

¶639

I Petition under Section 151 CPC^{prayingthat in the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed in support of the^{petition, the High Court maybe pleased to} suspend the operation of the lmpugned^{Orderdated 18-02.2021in l.A- No. 57 of} 2021,1.A. No.58of 2021, l.A.^{90 of 2021 and l.A. No. 91 of 2021in l.D. No.102 of} ,f2018 on the file of Hon'ble^{LabourCourt-1} ,^Hyderabad.

r,)

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be^pleased to^pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of^. the Respondent Workman in l.D.No. 1O2 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court Hyderabad.

¶644

lA NO: 2 OF 2024

¶645

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 102 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court i- l, Hyderabad. 'l.

¶646

lA NO: 3 OF 2024

¶647

i Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated_ in t: the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be^pleased. to extend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed in W.P. No. 12151 of 2021 until fur.l ther orders. l a

¶648

lA NO: 2 OF 2O2'l

¶649

Between:

¶650

Ameer Kasheem Bagayat, S/o Kasheem Bhagayat, Rl/o. H.No.13-173/1, Lokayukta Colony, Badangpet ,^Ranga Reddy District. l

¶651

...PETITION ERYRESPONDENT

¶652

M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Ltd, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) Ibrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana Rep. by its Senior Manager' Mr' Nitin Kumar

¶653

...RESpoNDENT/wRrr^pET:TroNER

¶654

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased^.lo vacate interim orders passed in W.P.No.1215112O21 on 01.06.2021

¶655

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA

.Counsel forthe Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN

¶660

WRIT PETITION NO: 12152OF²⁰²¹

¶661

Between:

¶662

M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures^{Limited,Sy.No.255,AdityaNagar'} Adibatla^(V) lbrahimpatnam^{lvlandal,Ranga ReddyDistrict50 1510,Telangana} Represented by its Senior^{Manager, lvlr. NitinKumar}

¶663

AND

¶664

Rames h Naika L N, S/o Naganaika, aged^{about 27 yearc,Rl/oC/oP. Damodar} Reddv, Organizing^'secretaiy, INTUC,-AP^{andTelariganaBranch,3-5-1089, 3rd} r-rfloor, Naratanguda, Hyderabad^- 500029 ...RESPONDENT

¶665

!*iiiii

¶666

Petition under Anide 226 of the^{Constitutionof lndia praying that in the} !*iiiii ,.':clrcumstances stated in the^{affidavltfiled therewith,the High Court may be} ij:leased^{to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writof} ,*bertiorari^{and to quashand set aside the Common order dated 18.02.20201} {:!l't. ',:"passed^{bytheHon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabadin l.A. No.127 of 2021,1-4.No.} ',7s of zOz't,l.A. No.^{126 of 2021 andI.A. No.26 of 2o21 in l.D. No. 15 of 2018 with} ,.,li"SrrO^{to amendmentof ClaimStatement, receiving additional documentsand} i':rbvidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner

¶667

': will suffer grave hardship and loss.

¶668

,:llANO: 1 oF 2021

¶669

; i Petition under Section 151 CPC^{prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in} ihe affidavit filed in support^{of the petition, the High Court may be pleasedto} 1^{Is'uspend the operation of the lmpugned Orderdated18.02.2021in l.A. No. 127of} tt=iozl, te. No. 25 0f 2021,1.A. No. 126 0l 2021 and l.A. No. 26 0f 2021 in l.D. No. '^'.!1's or zo t e on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-¹ ,^Hyderabad.

¶670

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶671

Petition under Section^{151CPCprayingthat in the circumstancesstated in} ihe affidavit filed in support^{of the petition, the High Court may be pleasedto pass} orders eschewing the^{additional evidencelet in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the} Respondent Workman in^{lD No 15 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l,} Hyderabad.

{ t

IA NO: 2 OF 2024

Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be^pleased to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 15 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.

¶677

lA NO: 3 OF 2024

¶678

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the order dated 12.01 .2024 passed in W.P. No. 12152 of 2021 until fu er orders. I

I I I

lA NO: 2 OF 2021

Between:

Ramesh Naika L N, S/o Naganaika, aged: 27 yearc, Ryo. P. Damodar_- Reddy, Organizing Secretary, INTUC, AP & Telangana Branch, 3-5-1089, 3'' Floor, Narayanguda, Hyderabad - 500029

¶683

... PETITIONER/RESPONDENT

¶684

AND

¶685

M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar Adibatla (V) Ibrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District 5015'10, Telangana Rep by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar

¶686

.,,RESPONDENTMRIT PETITIONER

¶687

Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the order dated: 01.06.2021 passed in l.A.No. 1 of 2021 in W.P.No. 12152 of 2021 in the interests of Justice

¶688

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA

¶689

Counsel for the Respondent: SRI RAVI CHANDRA BEJJARAM

¶690

¶691

WR lT PETITION NO: 12153 OF 2021

¶692

Between:

¶693

M/s. Tata Lockheed^l,lartin Aerostructures^{Ltd., Sy.No.255,Aditya Nagar, Adibatla} (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented byits Senior lvlanager, Mr. Nitin Kumar

¶694

...'ETITIONER

¶695

;i , AND ..1 1

¶696

Milind Tidka, S/o. Ashok Shankar Tidka,^{Age 29 years, Occ. Specialist, Rl/o PlotNo.} 86P, Shivsainagar, Badangpet, Ranga^{ReddyDistrict - 500058} ..RESPONDENT rt

¶697

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of^{lndia prayingthat in the} . aircumstances^{stated in the affidavitfiled therewith,the High Courtmay be} . iileased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to^quash and set aside^{the Common order dated '18.02.2021passed} .^{by the Hon'ble LabourCourt-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 74 of 2O21 and l.A. No.75 of} :.2021 in l.D. No. 33 of 2019 with regard to additional evidence and received ''documents^{in the interest of justice and equity,otherwise the Petitionerwill suffer} rlt r ,{grave hardship and loss.

¶698

xt^',

¶699

:NO: 1 OF 1

¶700

Petition under Section 151 CPC^{prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in} :'.the affidavit filed in^{supPortof the petition,the High Court may be pleasedto} .-iuspend^{the operationof the lmpugned Orderdated 18.02.2021in l.A. No-74 of} lrt t rr. :Yd2l ana l.A. No. 75 ot 2O21 in l.D. No. 33 of 2019 on the file of Hon'ble Labour

¶701

Court-1, Hyderabad.

¶702

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶703

'i rl Petition under Section 151 CPC^{prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in} :l I' the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence^{let in on 20.'11.2023on behalf of the} Respondent Workman in^{l.D.No.33of 2019 on the file of Labour Court - l,} ,HYd erab ad t{,l:I , t'l,'t ,l I l I I I

¶704

¶705

lA NO: 2 OF 2024

¶706

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedⁱⁿ the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be^pleased , to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order dated 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 33 of 2019 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.

¶707

IA NO: 3 OF 2024

¶708

Petition under Section 15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be^pleased to extend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed in W.P. No. 12153 of 2021 until further order. ' i:

¶709

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA

¶710

Counsel for the Respondent: -

¶711

WRITPETITIONNO:12154 OF 2021	.-,ir. 'ri.I! t:^/t, ll I

¶712

Between:

¶713

I Aditya Nagar, Adibatla.{V),Adibatla.{V), - 501510, Telangana Represented by501510, Telangana Represented byby I ...PETITIONER AND

¶714

M/s. Tata Sikorsky Aerospace Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla.{V),Adibatla.{V), lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by501510, Telangana Represented byby I its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar

¶715

Shiva Kumar JK, Sio. Kari Gowda Aged about 32 yea.s, Rl/o. 1 -68, Sri Maha lakshminagar, Badangpet, Saroornaga(M), Ranga Reddy Diskict - 500058.

¶716

...RESPONDENT i.

¶717

Petition under Anide 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 18/02/2021^passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1 , Hyderabad in l.A. No. 7 of 2O21 , l.A. No.8 of 2021, l.A. No, 142 of 2021 and l.A. No. 143 of 2021 in l.D. No. 78 of 2017 with regard to ir amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. I

fA NO:^'f OF 2021

lli Petition under Section^'1 51 CPC^praying that in the circumstances statedⁱⁿ lthe^{affidavit filed in supportof the petition, the High Court may be pleasedto} .,guspend^{the operation of the lmpugnedOrder daled 1810212021in l.A. No. 7 of} :,2021,1.A.^{No.8of 2021, LA. No. 142 of 2O21andl.A. No. 143 of 2021 in l.D. No.} 78 of 2017 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad.

¶722

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶723

;.; Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in l:' l!he.^{affidavit filed in supportof the petition, the HighCourt may be pleasedto} ,^jiiispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order

¶724

lidated 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 78 of 2017 on the file of Labour Court - [, Hyderabad. .*:r

:?.

i:;lANo:2oF2024

.;11

.' {,..r. eetition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in *$he-,affidavit^{filed in supportof the petition, the High Court may be pleasedto pass} ,.!{tl .:l

¶729

I tbrders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 2o.11 .2023 on behalf of the .Respondent Workman in l.D. No.⁷⁸ of^{2017 on the file of Labour Court - l,} a.i,l^. 'lHyderabad.'

¶730

'.]tt

¶731

lA NO: 3 OF 2024

¶732

. , Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances statedⁱⁿ the affidavit filed in support of the^{petition, the High Court may be pleasedto} ,$xtend the order daled 12-0'l-2024 passed in W.P. No. 12154 ot 2021 until further

...iorder. ittl

itA No; 2 oF 2021

,1, i l^Between:

,.Shiva^{Kumar JK, S/o. Kari Gowda Aged about 32 years,Rl/o.1-68,Sri Maha} :lakshminagar,^{Badangpet,Saroornagar(M), Ranga Reddy District - 500058.}

¶737

...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT AND

a,i

:,t

M/s. Tata Sikorsky Aerospace Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar,^{Adibatla (V),} lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented^by its senior Manager' It'4r' Nitin Kumar

¶743

...RES'.NDENTMR,r^pETrroNER

¶744

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedⁱⁿ the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court^{may be pleased to} vacate the order dated 01.06.2021 passed in W.P-No. 12154 of^{2021 in} the interests of^justice.

¶745

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA

¶746

Counsel for the Respondents: SRI RAVI CHANDRA BEJJARAM

¶747

WRIT PETITION NO: 1215s OF 2021 i

¶748

Between:

¶749

M/s. Tata Lockheed lrtlartin Aero structures Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya^Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal,Ranga Reddy District^- 501510,^Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin kumar

¶750

...PETITIONER AND

¶751

,,,,ii

¶752

Rajendra Madhukar Wagh, S/o Madhukar, Aged: about 32^years, Occ. Associate Fl./ti. New Synergy Homet6lony, Turkayanjal, Rangareddy^Didtrict, Telangana i

¶753

...RESPONDENT

¶754

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia^praying that.,in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of wljt, of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order^passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 53 ot 2Q21,l.A. No. 95 of 202'l and LA.,No. 94 ot 2021 in l.D. No. 100 of 2018 daled 181O212021 dated^1810212021 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving addttional documents and evidence on record in the interest of^justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer : grave hardship and loss.

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

l,':':

2021,1.A. No. 95 of 2O21 and I.A. No. 94 of 202'l in l.D. No. 100 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad.

¶761

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶762

:i: Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to^pass .orders^{eschewing the additional evidencelet in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the} )rl I^{,1.$espondent Workmanin lD No 100 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l,} Hyderabad.

¶763

NO:2 oF 2024

¶764

..i;r.r: .Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to '.r.,1'dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order ' dated 20.11.2023 in l.D. No.100 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. ,..1 ;

¶765

lA NO: 3 OF 2024

¶766

,{t,r, Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in 'itthe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to . 'tuxtend the order dated 12-01-2024 passed in W.P. No. 12155 of 202'1 until further ,^,drders.

*{.

N 2 F 2021

:'1

.{between:

Raiendra Madhukar Wagh, S/o Madhukar, R/o. New Synergy^HomeColony, Tuikayanial, Rangareddy District, Telangana ]: ...PETITIoNER/RESPoNDENT AND il .'*: '..M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla^(V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga^{Reddy District - 5015'10, Telangana} Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr.^Nitin kumar

¶773

Ii :a rii .l .l :.,*l ,.'t ' .''1\l I I _tl1.! al

¶774

...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER

¶775

Petrtion under Section 15'1 CPC^praying that in the circumstances statedⁱⁿ the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court^{may be pleasedto} vacate interim orders passed in W.P.No.1215512021 on 01 .06.2021 . j .

¶776

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA

¶777

Counsel for the Respondent: SRI ABID HUSSAIN

¶778

WRIT PETITION NO: 12156 OF 2021

¶779

Between:

¶780

M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255,^Adi tya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam lvlandal, Ranga Reddy^{District - 501510,} Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar

¶781

...PETITIONER

¶782

AND

¶783

Tippanna Kantli, S/o Rachappa, aged about 31^years,Rl/o C/o.^{P. Damodar Reddy,} Oigianizing Secretary, INTUC, AP and Telangana Branch,^{3-5-1089, 3rd floor,} Naiayanglda, Hyderabad - 5ooo29 |^' ...RESPONDENT l.

¶784

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia^praying that in!the I circumstances stated in the affidavit filed^therewith,- the^{High Court maylbe} pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order^{dated 18lO2l2O2O1} passed by the Honorable Labour Court-!, Hyderabad in lA. No. 131 of 2O21, l.A. No. 2'1 of 2021, l.A. No.130 of 2021 in l.D. No. 13 ot^{2018withregardto} amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents^{and evidence on} record in the interest of^justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer^grave hardship and loss.

¶785

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶786

Petition under Section^'151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated^ln the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court^{maybe pleased, to} suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order daled^{181021202'1in LA. No.131of} 2021, l.A. No. 21 of 2021, l.A. 130 of 2021 in l.D. No. 13 of 2018 on the file of li Honorable Labour Court-1, Hyderabad.

..', ,.: !

, lA NO: 1 OF 2024

'l! ;': i Petition under Section 151 CPC^{prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in support of^{the petition, the High Court may be pleasedto pass} ,,brders eschewing^{the additional evidencelet in on 20.11.2023 on behalfof the} il'"Respondent Workman in lD No 13 ol 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, I t{yderabad.

¶791

:IANO:2OF2 024

¶792

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances^{stated in} ., the affidavit filed in support of the^{petition,the High Court may be pleasedto} ilispense with the filing of Ce(ified^{Copy and Xerox Copy of the docketorder} daled 2O.11.2023 in l.D.^{No. 13 of 2018 on thefile of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.}

¶793

NO: 3 OF 24

¶794

¶795

t:.. Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances^{stated in} affidavit filed in support of the^{petition,the High Court may be pleasedto} nd the order daled 12-01-2O24^{passed in W.P.No. 12156 of 202'1 until further} ,,8ti",.

¶796

IA NO: 2 OF 2021

¶797

,lriBetw een: ,rl

¶798

Tippanna Kantli, Sig Rachappa, aged: 31^years, R/o.^{INTUC, AP & Telangana} Branch, 3-5-1089,3'" floor, Narayanguda, Hyderabad^{- 500029}

¶799

...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT iI AND {! 1lM/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255' Aditya Nagar' rAdibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510,^Telangana .Represenieil^{by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar} !

¶800

...RESPONDENTMRIT PETITIONER

¶801

a ri r P Petition under Section 151 CPC^{prayingthat in the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed^{in support of the petition,the High Court may be pleasedto} ivacate the^{order dated: 01.06.2021passed in LA.No. 1 of 2021 in W.P.No. 12156} \of 2021 in the interests of Justice.

¶802

¶803

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA

¶804

Counsel for the Respondent: SRI RAVI CHANDRA BEJJARAM

¶805

WRIT PETITION NO: 12157 OF 2021

¶806

Between:

¶807

tvl/s. Tata Lockheed l\4artin Aerostructures Ltd, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam lr/andal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represented by its Senior lvlanager, Mr. Nitin Kumar r

¶808

r ...PETITIONER

¶809

AND

¶810

I H. Santosha, S/o Hanumanthappa, aged about 35^years, Ryo. H.No.6-191, S.L: N.S Colony, Balapur X Road, Saroomagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana tb I

¶811

...RESPONDENT

¶812

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may, be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 18.02.20201 passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 13 of 2021, l.A. No. 14 of 2O21,1.A. No. 138 ot 2021 and l.A. No. 139 of 2021 in l.D. No. 94 of 2017 with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of^justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss.

¶813

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶814

Petition under Section 1 51 CPC^praying that in the circumstances statedⁱⁿ the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleasedto suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 18.02.2021^passed in l.A.^No. 119 of 2021 ,1.A. No. 31 of 2021,1.A. No. 118 of 2021 and l.A. No. 32 of 2021ⁱⁿ l.D. No. 83 of 20'18 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad.

¶815

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶816

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased o

i I I

dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order daled 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 94 of^20'17 on the^{file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad.}

¶821

lA NO: 2 OF 2024

¶822

':l

¶823

p"tition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in . the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be^pleased to^pass r'iriirders eschewing the additional^{evidencelet in on 20.11.2023 on behalfof the} ,, ,'il.espondent 'i,^{Workmanin l.D. No. 94 of 2017 on the file of LabourCourt - l,} ! .j.Hyderabad. ll'

¶824

¶825

'. IA'NO: 3 OF 2024

¶826

tl ,:^{Petition underSection151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in} ,-!he affidavit filedⁱⁿ support^{of the petition,the High Courtmaybe pleasedto} ''':: bxtend the order dated 12.01.2024^{passedin W.P.No. 12157 of 2021 until further}

order

!.t,l

lA NO: 2 OF 202

'Between:

. H.rSantosha, S/o Hanumanthappa, Fyo. H.No.6-191, S.L. N.S. Colony, Balapur X 'Road,^{SaroomagarMandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana.} I I ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT L! '}l, AND f:

¶832

M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures^{Limited,Sy.No.255,Aditya Nagar,} :,.lAdibatla^{(V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 50 1510, Telangana} ' 'Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar rr : I ...RESPoNDENT/wRIT PETtTtoNERPETtTtoNER

¶833

...RESPoNDENT/wRIT PETtTtoNERPETtTtoNER

¶834

,ti:i

¶835

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the^{circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in support of the^{petition,the High Court maybe pleasedto} .vacale^{interim orders passed in W.P.No.1214712021on 01 .06.2021.}

¶836

raCounsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA

¶837

Counsel forthe Respondent: Mr. ABID^HUSSAIN

¶838

¶839

¶840

WRIT PETITION NO: 12159 OF 2021

¶841

Between:

¶842

tvl/s. Tata Lockheed lviartin Aerostructures Ltd., Sy.No.2.55, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam lvlandal, Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana Represerlted : by'its Senior lt/anager, Mr. Nitin Kumar

¶843

: ...PETITIONER

¶844

AND

¶845

Jikesh Kumar Mohanthy, S/o Gaurang Charm Mohanth y, aged about 26 years, R/o C/o. P. Dangodar Reddy, Organizing Secretary,^INTUC, AP and Telangana Bra.1ch, 3-5-1089, 3'' floor, Narayanguda, Hyderabad^- 500029

¶846

...RESPONDENT

¶847

Petition under Artide 226 of the Constitution of lndia^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court maylbe tr pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to^quash and set aside the Common order dated^18102120201 passed by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 129 of 2021 , ' l.A. rNo. .li 23 of 2O21,l.A. No. 128 of 2021 and l.A. No. 24 of 2021 in 1.D. No. 14 ot 2018 ,rt,r., with regard to amendment of Claim Statement, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of^justice and equity, otherwise lthe I Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. ,l i

¶848

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶849

Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances sta,tld" in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order daled 18-02.2021 in l.A. No. 129 of 2021,l.A. No. 23 of 2021, LA. No.^'128 of 2021 and l.A. No. 24 of 2021 in l.D: ,No. 14 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad. It:ll

¶850

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶851

I Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be pleasef ,^to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the docket order daled 2O.11.2O23 in l.D. No. 14 of 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hyderabad. j

lA NO: 2 OF 2024

,ri.

:rl Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances statedⁱⁿ 'the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass : orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the I $espondent^{Workman in l.D. No. 14 ol 2018 on the file of LabourCourt - l,} ,ii, r.:Hyderabad.

¶857

lA NO: 3 OF 2024

¶858

.-l Petition under Section 15'l CPC^praying that in the circumstances stated in :!he :t affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to .iixtend the order daled 12-01-2024 passed in W.P. No. 12159 of 2021 until further i:rder.

¶859

: ri.Cou nsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA tl

¶860

**Cou nsel forthe Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN 'll^i' r'l' WRIT PETITION PETITION NO: 1212 1 60 0F 2021

¶861

WRIT PETITION PETITION NO: 1212 1 60 0F 2021

¶862

'^1'Between:

¶863

¶864

,:tM/31. tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya^Nagar, XAdibatla^{(V) lbrahimpatnamMandal,Ranga Reddy District - 501510, Telangana} '-l::Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Nitin Kumar

¶865

...'ET.T,ONER

¶866

AND

¶867

G.M. Chethan, S/o C. Mylarappa, Aged about 24^{years,Ryo.H.No.} l-77,^Srilatha ,Building,^{Badangpet, Saroornagar(M), Ranga Reddy District,Telangana -500058}

¶868

...RESPONDENT

¶869

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia^praying thatⁱⁿ the iircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith,^{the High Court may be} pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly on in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to^quash and set aside the Common order^{dated 18.02.2021passed} by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in^{1-A. No. 5 of 2021, l.A. No. 6 of} ...2021, l.A. No. 144 of 2O21 and l.A. No. 145 ot 2021 in l.D. No. 77 of 2O17 with 'ibgard^{to amendmentof Claim Statement, receiving additional documentsand} evidence on record in the interest of^justice and equity,^{otherwise the Petitioner} .ririll suffer grave hardship and loss.

i ,:

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that^{in the circumstancesstatedin} the affidavit filed in support of the^{petition,the High Court maybe pleasedto} suspend the operation of the impugned Order^{dated18.02.2021 passedin l.A. No.} 145 ot 2021,1.A. No. 5 of 2021,1.A. No.¹⁴⁴ ol^{2021 and l.A. No'6 of 2021 in} .D. No. 77 of 2017 on the file of Hon'ble Labour^{Court-1, Hyderabad}

¶874

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶875

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying thatⁱⁿ the^{circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in support of the^{petition,the HlghCourt may be pleased to} ASS orders eschewing the additional evidence^{let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf ofthe} Respondent Workman in l.D. No.77 of 2017 on the file of Labour Court Hyderabad. ;.tri

¶876

lA NO: 2 OF 2024

¶877

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that^{in the circumstanc€sstatOdin} the affidavit filed in support of the^{petition,the High Court mayU"} oru"."f!to dispense with the filing of Certified Copy^{and Xerox Copy of the docket grder} dated 20.11.2023 in l.D. No 77 ot 2017 on the file of Labour Court - l, Hrd"ilbfld

¶878

lA NO: 3 OF 2024

¶879

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances^{stateldi in} the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the^{High Court may be pleased} i^{. to} extend the order dated 12-01-2024^{passedin W.P. No. 12160ot 2021 untilfurther} order. i i lA NO: 2 OF 2021 i 1,.

¶880

Between:

¶881

G.M. Chethan, S/o C. Mylarappa, Rl/o.H.No.1-77,^{Srilatha Building,Badangpet,} Saroornagar [,4andal, Ranga Reddy^District, Telangana.

¶882

¶883

,ti ,

¶884

M/s. Tata Lockheed [/artin Aeroskuctures Limited, Sy.No.255,^Adi tya Nagar, Adibatla^(V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal,^{RangaReddy District - 501510,} Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager,^fvlr. Nitin^Kumar

¶885

...RESPONDENTMRIT PETITIONER

¶886

' i,i '.. I Petition under Section¹ 51 CPC^praying that in the circumstances^stated ln :'a the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the^{High Court may be pleased} to .Vacate the interim orders passed in WP No.121601 2021, dt.01.06.2021.

¶887

lbou1:,

¶888

nsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA

¶889

;r, rlii , nsel forthe Respondent: Mr. ABID HUSSAIN lr "iou xl WRIT PETITION NO: Ii

¶890

WRIT PETITION NO: 14625 OF 2021

¶891

: Between:

¶892

riirlls. fata Advanced Systems Limited,^{Sy.No.656,Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V)} lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy^{District - 501 510, Telangana Represented by} its General Manager, Mr. Arjun Myne I ...PETrroNER

¶893

AND

¶894

il.Ramanianeyulu, S/o. B.Raju Aged^{about 32 years,R/o} H.No. 6-44, Ayodhya 'Nagar, Mberpbt, Saroor Nagar, Hyderabad, 500097

¶895

...RESPONDENT

¶896

r] Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of^{lndiapraying that in the} '.tircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be 'pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of ,jC<i*iorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 12.04.2021^passed :ll Liy the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad^{in l.A. No.179 ot 2O21 and l.A. No. 180} Jdt'zozl in l.D. No. 121 of 2018 with regard to additional evidence and received ll1, i ,. ,^iddCuments in the interest of^justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner^{will suffer} .'. grave hardship and loss.

1,^,,

IANO:

oF 2021

,: Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that^{in the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in support^{of the petition,the High Court may be pleased to} suspend the operation of the lmpugned^{Order dated 12.04.2O21in l.A. No. 179of} 2021 and l.A. No. 180 of^{2O21 in l.D. No.12'1 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour}

Court-1, Hyderabad.

ti^.. il: itittt il

N i 10F 2024

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances^{stated in} the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the^{High Court may be pleasedto} dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and^{Xerox Copy of the docket order} dated 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 121 ot 2018^{on the file of Labour Court} '-^l, I Hyderabad.

¶907

lA NO: 2 OF 2024

¶908

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances statedⁱⁿ the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High^{Court may be pleasedto} SS orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023^{on behalf} ,of ] the r;.1 Respondent Workman in l.D. No. 121 ol^2O18 on the^{file of LabourCourt]} al tit "{ Hyderabad. I iI ,'.:.l lA NO: 3 OF 2024 i i tiitrl

¶909

Petition under Section^'l 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances sta tn : the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the^{High Court may be pleas} ed rto 'rl extend the order dated 12.01.2024^passed in W.P.^{No. 14625 of 2021 until further} order.

¶910

Counsel forthe Respondent: SRI B. KRISHNA

¶911

Between:

¶912

M/s. Tata Boeing Aerospace Ltd., TSIIC Aerospace SEZ, Plot No 1iD, Sy t',to:'OSO, Aditya Nagar, Aijibatla (v) lbrahimpatnam^(lvl) Ranga Reddy District, Telangana^- 501510 Represented by its Deputy General lvlanager, Mr. Mandar Ravinder Pha{ke

¶913

...PETITIONER

¶914

AND S.Srinivasa Rao, S/o. S. Satyam, Aged about 29^years, R/o H.No. 6-348, Plot^I ifo Old Balaji Nagar, lvleerpet Saroornagar, Hyderabad 500097

¶915

...RESPONDENT

¶916

:l'

¶917

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in:the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court maY1 .be { rl

--1

, pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of .certiorari^{and to quash and set aside the commonorder dated 12.04.2o21 passed} r: by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad^{in l.A. No. 187 of 202landl.A' No 188} rl , -!6f zozl in l.D. No. 125 of 2018 with regard to additional evidence and received ..ttocuments in the interest of justice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer it girave hardship and loss.

¶922

IA:NO: oF 2021

¶923

Petition under Section 151 CPC^{prayingthat in the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed in support^{of the petition, the High Court may be pleasedto} f$usnenA^{the operationof the lmpugnedOrder daled12.04.2021in l.A. No. 187 of} :,"zoz't and l.A. No. 188 ol 2021 in l.D. No. 125 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad

¶924

lA NO: 1

¶925

': Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the^{circumstances statedin} 6..affidavit filed in support of the^{petition, the High Court may be pleased to} dpense with the filing of Certified Copy^{and Xerox Copy of the docket order} ated 20.11.2023 in l.D.^{No. 125 of 2O18 on the file of Labour Court - I,} fderabad.

¶926

¶927

r't NO 2 F 2024

¶928

' Petition under Section 151 CPC^prayingthat in the^{circumstances statedin} ihe affidavit filedⁱⁿ support of^{the petition,the High Court may be pleasedto pass} 'il ,

¶929

.r".&rders eschewing the additional evidence let in on^{20.11 .2023 on behalf of the} Respondent Workman in^{l.D. No. 125 ot 2018 on the file of Labour Court - l,} Hyderabad

¶930

1A NO: 3 OF 2024

¶931

il Petition under Section 151 CPC^{prayingthat in the circumstances statedin} i*[re affiOavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be^pleasedto .lfJxtend the order dated 12.01.2024 passed in W.P. No. 14627 of 2021 until further Uro.r.

¶932

tl t

¶933

¶934

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA

¶935

Counsel for the Respondents: SRI B. KRISHNA

¶936

WRIT PETITION NO: 14629 OF 2021

¶937

Between:

¶938

M/s. Tata Sikorsky Aerospace Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya NagaI, Adibatlal^(V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy Diskict - 501510, Telangana Represented by its Senior Manager, Mr. Peri V Seshagiri Rao S/o. Mr. P V L S Sharma t ...PETITIONER AND I

¶939

V. Gangadhar Rao, S/o. Ramakrishna Rao, Aged about 34 years, Rl/o. Huda Colony, Chandanagar, Hyderabad - 500050

¶940

...RESPONDENT l"

¶941

Petition under Adicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia^praying that'inf the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may, be pleased to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated^{1210412021 palsed} 'll by the Hon'ble Labour Court-1, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 185 of 2021,l.A. No.186 of 2021 ln l.D. No. 124 ot 2018 with regard to amendment of Claim Statempnt, receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of^juslice and equity, otherwise the Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss. i ll

¶942

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶943

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 12.04.2O21 in l.A. No. 185 of 2021,1.A. No.186 of 2021 in l.D. No.124 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble LaCour i Court - 1, Hyderabad.

¶944

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶945

i Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in I the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf of the :t Respondent Workman in 1.D.No.124 ot 2018 on the file of Labour Court t Hyderabad. {I

t I

i^,lf , .:: t:

ri lA NO: 2 OF 2024

!i'

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances statedⁱⁿ the affidavit filed in suppo( of the^{petition,the High Court may be pleasedto} dispense with the filing of Certified Copy^{and Xerox Copy of the docket order} dated 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 124 of 2018^{on the file} of^{Labour Court - l,} Hyderabad.

¶952

lA NO: 3 OF 2024 ,:i' Ii+,^{Petition underSection151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstances statedin} riihe affidavit^{filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleasedto} i$Jri!"0 the order dated 12.01.2024 passed in W.P. No. 14629 of 2021 until further riJ.aer

¶953

ir. t

¶954

i Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA

¶955

'dt l .i;S,Qounsel for the Respondents: SRI B. KRISHNA 1t^''

¶956

WRIT PETITION NO: 14630 OF 2021

¶957

l_lBetween:

¶958

t*l r:

¶959

-ll't/d. tata Sikorskv Aerospace Limited, Sy.No.255, Aditya Nagar, Adibatla (V) lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy^{District - 501510, Telangana Represented by} its Genirral Manager. Mr. Peri V^{SeshagiriRao S/o. Mr. P V L S Sharma} ...PETITIONER AND

¶960

'Rajesh Chaganti, S/o. lssac, Aged about 34 years, Fl/o. 5-1-16/1'01d Meerpet i - Hyderabad 4i ...RESPONDENT

¶961

ilf i, Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the ll r. , ,IJircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the^{High Court may be} Ijt"aseO to issue an order, direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of .iCertiorari and to quash and set aside the Common order dated 121O412021^passed lr 'kiy the Hon'ble Labour Court-l, Hyderabad in l.A. No. 177 ol 2021' l.A. No.178 of 2021 in l.D. No.^12O of 2018^{with regard to amendmentof Claim Statement,} 'receiving additional documents and evidence on record in the interest of justice !,

¶962

'Cnd^{equity, otherwisethe Petitioner will suffer grave hardship and loss.}

;l rl ilti

*+ ll

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lmpugned Order dated 1210412021 in l.A. No. 1 77. of 2021, l.A. No 178 of 2021 in l.D. No.120 of 2018 on the file of Hon'ble Labour Court-1 , Hyderabad.

¶969

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be to t dispense with the filing of Certified Copy and Xerox Copy of the d ef daled 20.11.2023 in l.D. No. 120 oI 2018 on the file of Labour t, Hyderabad

¶970

lA NO: 2 OF 2024

¶971

Petition under Section^'151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to^pass orders eschewing the additional evidence let in on 20.11.2023 on behalf.offthe Respondent Workman in LD. No. 12O of 2018 on the file of Labour Courtlj^I, Hyderabad. l

¶972

lA NO: 3 OF 2024

¶973

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances statedⁱⁿ the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may Ue Ofeaseflto extend the order dated 12.01 .2024 passed in W.P. No. 14630 of 2021 until furlher order. ',I'lififi

¶974

',I'lififi li l' I i I I T

¶975

counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA

¶976

Counsel for the Respondents: SRI B. KRISHNA

¶977

The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER

¶978

i"*

¶979

THE HONOI'RABLE SMT JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI

¶980

W.P.Nos. 1O224 102L6 5868 1to92 11093 LLO94 11095. 11096, 11100, 11101, 11103, 111()4, 11105, 11106, tlto7. rI108, 12142, 12143, 12L44, 12145, L2146, L2147, L2L4A L2L49 12150 t2t5t 12152 12153 L2154 12155 12L56, t2 157. 12159, 12160, 14625, 14627, L4629 & L+630 0F 2021

¶981

COMMON ORDER:

¶982

In these writ petitions, petitioner management is seeking a writ of certiorari, to^quash and set aside the^commonorder passed by the Labour Court- 1, Hyderabad dated 18.02.2021 in the interlocutory applications filed in the batch^{of ID's filedby} the workmen of the^petitioner company,^{such as} in^{I.A.No.18 of} 2O21, I.A.No.143 of 2019, I.A.No.7l of 2027 &^{I.A.No. 150} of 2O2l in I.D.No.73 of 2017, dated 18.02.2021,^allowingthe amendment of Claim petition, receipt of additional^documents and evidence on record as bad in law,^{in the interest ofjustice,} equality and to pass such other^{order or ordersin the interestof} justice.

¶983

Similar orders have been challenged in the other^Writ Petitions which are forming^{part of this batch.}

¶984

Brief facts leading to the filing of^{the present writ} petitions are that the respondents were all^{employeesof the} petitioner company. On the ground that the^{workmen were}

¶985

¶986

TMD,J W-P.No- 70224 of 2O21 & baach

¶987

unauthorizedly absent for a period of ten to srxteen days, the petitioner company has initiated disciplinary proceedings against some of the workmen. Out of 500 employees, who abstained from duties, for the charges of unauthorized absence, some were let off with deduction of 18 days wages, while 100 employees were charge sheeted, while some others were let off with minor punishment of with-holding two annual increments and continuity of service and some others were removed from service. The workmen, who have been removed from service therefore, filed IDs before the Labour Court challenging the removal order and during the pendency of ID, the petitioner in W.P.No.5868 of 2O2l has filed I.A.No. 143 of 2Ol9 to condone the delay and permit certain documents (as per the list enciosed there with) to be brought on record. The said I.A., rvas frled on 15.07.2019 and thereafter, the Labour Court has considered the contentions of both parties about the validity of domestic enquiry and has upheld the validity of domestrc enqurry. It is thereafter that the Tribunal has taken up I.A.No.143 of 2079 and also I.A.No.18 of 2021- which was filed by the respondents workmen to amend the claim petition, I.A.No.71 of 2O2L to adduce additional evidence and I.A.No.15O of 2021 to adduce two more documents.

¶988

¶989

TIVD'J W.P-No. 70224 of 2021 & ba.ch

¶990

The Management has raised^{objections to said I.As.,} on the ground that since the^{domestic enquiryhas been heldto} be valid, the workmen cannot^{now lead any new evidence on} record as it is barred by the^Proviso to^{Section11(A) of the} Industrial Disputes Act. The^{Management had also relied upon} certain^judgments of the^{HontrleSupremeCourt in support of} their contentions. However,^{the Labour Court has allowedthe} I.As., by way of a common^{order dated 18.02.2027.Tlre} Management has thus, challenged^{the orders dated l8-O2.2O21} by frling the present writ^{petitions and vide interimorder dated} 30.06.2021, the order d,ated'^{L8.O2.2021 passedby the Labour} Court was suspended. However,^{relyinguponthe judgment of} the Hon'ble Supreme Court in^{the case of Asian Resurfacing of} Road Agency Private Limited^{& Another Vs. Central Bureau} of Investigationt wherein the^{Hon'lcle SupremeCourt had held} that an interim order of any Court^{shallbe in force for a period} of six months only unless extended^{by the Court, and since the} interim order dated 18.02.2021^{was not extended by this court,} the Labour Court^{proceeded with the matterand examined the} witnesses and marked documents^{as W1 to W29 and the matter} is now stated to be posted for^arguments.

¶991

I (2018)16 scc 299

¶992

¶993

TMD'J W.P.No. 10224 of 2021 & bcach

¶994

l,r:arne d counsel appearing for the petitloner management, i.r,hile reiterating the above submissrons, submitted th.it the Proviso to Section 1 1(A) of the ID Act prohibits bringing on record of any new material, unless the Tribunal or Labour Court has held the domestic enqulry to be not valid. It is submitted that in cases where domestic enquiry has been held to be not validly conducted, it is for the management empioyer to .lead the evidence and it is in such circumstances that the employee also gets an opportunity to file evidence contrary to the evidence of the employer. It is submitted that in this case, the employee has not challenged the order of the Labour Court upholding the validity of domestic enquiry and therefore, it is the workmen who are precluded from frling any applications for bringing on record any fresh material.

¶995

Learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn the attention of this Court to following case laws in support of his contentions:

¶996

(lf Delhi Cloth and General Mills Company Vs. Ludh Budh Singhz. for the proposition that it is only where the

¶997

2 (19721 r scc s9s

¶998

¶999

TMD,J W.P.No. 10224 oJ 2o2l & bstch

¶1000

preliminary issue is decided against the management that the employer can be given an opportunity to file additional evidence and also to give similar opportunity to the employee to lead evidence per contra.

¶1001

(2f The Workmen of M/s.Firestone Tyre & Rubber Company of India (Pvt.,l Limited Vs. The Management & Othersa, wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court has considered the power of the Tribunal to interfere with its frnding of misconduct recorded in the domestic enquiry unless one or other infirmities as pointed out by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Indian Iron and Steel Compang Limited, existed and it was held that the earlier the Tribunal had no^power to interfere unless the finding was perverse or the^punishment was so harsh as to lead to be an inference of victimization or unfair labour practice, but after insertion of Section 11(A), the^position is that the employer is entitled to adduce evidence for^{the first} time before the Tribunal even if he had held no enquiry or^the enquiry held by him is found to be defective. It^{is thereafter that} an opportunity will have to be^given to the^workman to^lead evidence contra. It was further observed that even^after introduction of Section¹ 1(A), the employer^{as well as the}

¶1002

3 (1973) r scc 813

¶1003

¶1004

TMD,J w.P.No- 10224 of 2o27 & bdtch

¶1005

employee can adduce evidence regarding the^{legalitvor validity} of the domestrc enquiry, if one had^{been held by an employer.} Further in the case of The Workmen^{of M/s.FirestoneTyre &} Rubber Company of India (Pvt.'f Limited^{(cited supra)t}re} Honble Supreme Court has considered the scope^{of the Proviso} to Section i 1(A) of the Act and has held^{that expression} "materials on record", occurring in the^{proviso,cannot be} confined oniy to the materials which^{were availableat the} domestic enquiry, but they aiso take in:

¶1006

(1) the evidence taken by the management at the enquiry and the proceedings of t he enquiry, or

¶1007

(2) the above evidence and in addition, any further evidence led before the Tribunal, or

¶1008

(3) evidence placed before the Tribunal for the first time in support of the action taken by an employer as weli as^the evidence adduced by the workmen contra.

¶1009

It was held that the expression fresh evidence^has to^be read in the context in which it appears namely,^{as distinguished} from the expression materials on record.

¶1010

The Hon'ble Supreme Court also held that^the Proviso only emphasizes that the Tribunal has to satisff^itself one way or the other regarding misconduct, the^punishment and the relief to be granted to workmen only on the basis of the

¶1011

¶1012

TMD,J w.P.No. 10224 of2o21 E bdtch

¶1013

materials on record before it and^{what thosematerialscomprise} of have been mentioned earlier^{and the Tribunal for the} purposes referred to above, cannot call for further or^fresh evidence, as an appellate authority^{may normallydo undera} particular statute, when considering the^{correctnessor} otherwise of an order^{passed by a subordinate bodyand the} matter in the^proviso refers to^{the order of discharge or} dismissal that is being considered^{by the Tribunal.}

¶1014

Learned counsel for the^{petitioner further placed} reliance upon the decisions^{of the Hon'ble Supreme Courtin the} case of Messrs Bharat Iron \llorks^{Vs. Bhagubhai Balubhai} Patel & Othersa and also in^{the case Karnataka State Road} Transport Corporation Vs.^{Lakshmidevamma(SMf) &} Anothets, though the facts^{and circumstancesin the said case} are distinguishable, therefore,^{according to him, the relianceon} these decisions to grant relief^{and in allowing the petitionsfrled} by the workman is misplaced.^{Thus, accordingto the learned} counsel for the^{petitionerthe order of the LabourCourt in all} the I.As., is liable to be^{set aside.}

¶1015

a (1926) r scc sra

¶1016

s qzoorl s scc +a:

¶1017

¶1018

TMD,J W.P.No. 70224 oJ 2021 a bdtch

¶1019

Learned counsel for the workman, on the other hand, submitted that the petitioner management had resorted to victimization only because the workman had formed into a Union and the management wanted to suppress the unity of the workman. He tried to bnng out the instalces where 500 workmen had abstained from duties, but only felv workmen have been punished with punishment of removal from service, whereas others were let off with lesser punishments or let off with only deducting their salaries for a period of eighteen days. It is submitted that as soon as the respondents were removed from service, the IDs were filed challenging the removal orders and subsequently, when the petitioners realized that the management has resorted to victimization and differentia-l treatment was given to different employees, the petitioners have gathered the information and have hled I.A-No.143/2019 to permit documents to be taken on record only to demonstrate the victimization. It is submitted that though the petition has been fiIed prior to the order validating the domestic enquiry, the said petition was taken up subsequent thereto, but the said circumstances alone cannot determine the power of the Tribunal to admit additional documents which are only in relation to the issue involved in the ID. It is submitted that the

¶1020

¶1021

TMD,J WP.No. 10224 of2021 & botch

¶1022

docr.rments Iiled by the workmen were only in relation to the issue of victimization and no new facts have been brought on record and therefore, it is part of material on record. He submitted that the Labour Court has taken into^{consideration} the powers of the Tribunal in allowing the material to be brought on record only for^protecting the^{workmen from the} unfair labour practice adopted by the management^and it^{was in} these lines that the^judgment of the Hon'ble^{Supreme Courtin} the case of Messrs Bharat Iron Works^(cited supra) ald^{also in} the case of Management of SBI Vs. Industrial Tribunal-l^has been considered. Therefore, according to the learned^{counsel for} the workmen, the orders of the^{Labour Court are justifiedand} no interference is called for.

¶1023

Having regard to the rival contentions and^the material on record, this Court^finds that^{the only issue to be} decided in this writ petition is^whether the^{Tribunal under} Section 1 1 (A) of Industrial Disputes Act is^{prohibitedfrom} entertaining the evidence filed by^{the workmenafterfrlingof the} ID. In this case the workmen have^{beenremoved from service on} the ground of an unauthorized^{absencefor a period of 10 days.} In the ID's, the workmen have^{raised the groundof unfair}

¶1024

¶1025

TfltD,J W.P.No. 70224 oJ 2O27 & baach

¶1026

labour practice, but could not file the relevant documents along with the ID. It is subsequent to the filing of the ID ald before hearing of the parties on the validity of the domestic enquiry, that the I.A.No. 143/2021 has been filed to bring the documents on record. The Proviso to Section 11(A) prohibits bringing on record any fresh evidence other than the material on record.

¶1027

The Hon'trle Supreme Court in the case of The Workmen of M/s.Firestone \rre & Rubber Company of India (Pvt.,f Limited, (cited supra), has clearly brought out as to what is to be considered as "material on record" ald what is "fresh evidence"? For the purpose of ready reference, the relevant paragraphs are re-produced here under:

¶1028

'48-49. We are not inclined. to accept the aboue contention of Mr.Deshmukh. The Prouiso specifies motters uhich the Tribunal shall take into account as also matters tuhich it shall not. The expression 'mateials on record', occurring in the Prouiso, in our opinion, connot be conflned onlA to the mateials uthich Luere auailable at the domestic enquiry. On the other hand, the 'mateials on record' in the Prouiso must be held to refer to mateials on record before the Tibunal. Theg take in-

¶1029

(1) the euidence taken bg the management cLt the eruryiry and the proceedings of the enquiry, or

¶1030

(2) the aboue euidence and in ctddition, ang furlher euidence led before the Tnbunal, or

¶1031

(3) euidence placed before the Tibunal for the first time in support of the action taken by an employer as utell as the euidence adduced bg the uorkmen contra.

¶1032

The aboue items bg and large should be considered to be the 'mateiab on record' as specified in the Prouiso. We are not inclined to limit thot expression as meaning onlg that mateial thot has been placed in a domestic enqu[ry.

¶1033

¶1034

TMD,J W.P.No. ,0224 oJ 2o21 A. batch

¶1035

Tlrc Prouiso only confines the Tibunal to the mateials on record before it os spectfted aboue, uhen consideing the jusfirtcafion or otherluise of the order of discharge or dismissa/. It is only on the basis of these mateials thot the Tibunal is obliged. to consider uhether the misconduct is proued and the Jurther question u.thether the proued misconduct justifies the punishment of dismissal or discharge. It also prohibits the Tibunal from taking ang fresh^{euidence either} for^{satisfging itselfregardingthe} misconduct or for alteing the puni-shment. From the Prouiso it is not certainlg possible to come to the conclusion that tahen once it is held that an enquiry has not been held or is found^{to be dekctiue,dn order reinstatingthe uorkman} tt-till haue to be made bg the Tibunol. Nor does it follou-t thot the Prouiso depiues an employer of his ight to adduce euidence for the first time before the TibunaL The expression fresh euidence' has to be read in the context in u.thich it dppears namelg, as distinguished from the expression 'mateials on record'. If so read, the Prouko does not present ang dfficultg at all.

¶1036

The legislation in Section 11-A has made a departure in certain respects in the lau.t as laid doun by this Court. For the first time,^pouer has been^giuen to a Tibunal to satisfg itself u-thether misconduct is^proued. This is particttlarlg so, as alreadg pointed out bA us, regarding euen findings arriued at bg an emploger in an enquiry properlg held. The Tibunal has also been^giuen pouer, also for the first time, to interkre with the punishment imposed bg an employer. When such uide potaers haue been nout conferred on Tribunals, tte legislafi.ce obuiously felt that some restrictions haue to be imposed regarding uhat matters could be taken into account. Such restictions are found in the Prouiso.^The Prouiso onlg empLnsises that the Tibunol has to satisfg itself one uaA or other regarding misconduct, the punishment and the relief to be granted to uorkmen onlg on the basis of the 'mateiols on record' before it. Wlnt those mateials comprise of hdue been mentioned eorlier. The Tibunal for the purposes rekrred to aboue, cannot coll for further^or fresh^{euidence,as an appellateauthoitgmag} normallg do under a particular stotute, when consideing the correctness or otheruise of an order^passed bg a subordinate bodg. The 'matter' in the Prouiso rekrs to the order of discharge or dismissal that is being considered bg the Tibunal.'

¶1037

¶1038

TMI',J W.P.No- 10224 of 2027 & bdtch

¶1039

Further in the case of Delhi Cloth and^General Mills

¶1040

Company (cited supra), the Delhi High Court^{has also observed} as under:

¶1041

From the aboue deci.sions the follouing^principles broadlg emerge - (1) xxxx

¶1042

(2) xx,xx

¶1043

(3) xxxx

¶1044

(4) When a domestic enquiry has been held bg the managenlent and the management relies on the same, it is open to the latter to request the Tibunal to try the ualidity of the domestic enquiry as a preliminary issue and also ask for an oppor1tnitA to adduce euidence before the Tribunal, if the finding on the preliminary issue is against the management. Houeuer elaborate and cumbersome^the procedure mag be, under such circumstances, it is open to the Tibunal to deal, in the first instance, as a^preliminary issue the ualidity oJ the domestic enqtiry. If its finding on the preliminary issue is in fauour of the management, then no additional euidence need be cited by the management. Bu[ if the finding on the preliminary issue is ogainst the mdnagement, the Tibunal uill haue to giue the emploger an opportunitg to cite addihonal euidence and also^giue a similar opportunitg to the employee to lead euidence contra, as the request to adduce euidence Lnd been made by^the management to the Tribunal duing the course of the proceedings ond before the tial has come to an end. When the preliminary issue is decided against th.e management and tLre latter leads euidence before tle Tibunal,^th-e position, under such circumstaruces, uill be, tlnt the management is depiued of the benefit of hauing the finding of the domestic Tibunal being accepted as pima facie proof of the alleged misconduct. On the other hond, the management utll haue to proue, by adducing^proper euidence, tLnt the taorkman is guiltg of misconduct and that tl9 action taken bg it is proper. It uill not be^just and fair^{eitherto the management or to the uorkmanthot the} Tibunal should refuse to toke euidence and thereby osk tlle management to make a further ctpplication, after holding a proper enquiry, and depiue the utorkman of^the benefit oJ the Tibunal itself being satisfied, on euidence adduced before it, that he LUas or Luas not guiltg of the alleged misconduct.

¶1045

¶1046

TMD,J W.P-No. 10224 of 2021 &. bdkn

¶1047

I I

¶1048

I I

¶1049

In the batch of these cases, it is observed that the Tribunal has already upheld the validity of the domestic enquiry conducted by the management and therefore, the Tribunal has to necessarily go into merits of the order of verdict passed by the management. It is in these circumstances, that the respondent employees have filed applications for taking on record, the additional documents which were come to their knowledge after filing of the IDs. The Labour Court has conside'red all the relevalt^judicial precedents on issue and a-lso the legal position i.e., proviso of Section 11(A) of ID Act before allowing the claim petition and has allowed to bring on record the relevant documents. In the order upholding the validity of the proceedings, the Tribunal could not have gone into the merits of the issue and it is only in the subsequent proceedings that the Tribunal/Labour Court will go into the merits of the issue and the documents now frled by the respondent workmen are in respect of merits of the issue and therefore, the Tribunal was right in allowing the documents to be brought on record. The petitioner management will get an opportunity to rebut or reply to the documents filed by the petitioners being taken on record

¶1050

¶1051

AMD,J W.P-No. 10221 of 2027 d. batch i

¶1052

'I I by the Labour Court during the subsequcnt procee<lings and hence there is no violation of the principles of Natural Justice and no prejudice, what-so-ever is caused to the maDagement by the above order of the Labour Court.

¶1053

With these remarks, this Court does not find any merit in these writ petitions fiied by the management.

¶1054

Accordingly, these writ petitions are dismissed. li There shall be no order as to costs.

¶1055

Miscellaneous petitions, if a-ny, pending in these

¶1056

writ petitions, shall stand closed.

¶1057

SD/. T.JAYASREE ASSISTANT REGIS SECTIO OFFICER

¶1058

i
I {
.lt I
il o;
I
I I

¶1059

/TTRUE COPY//

¶1060

One CC to SRI T.^{ANANDSUBRAMANIAI\4,Advocate [OPUC]}

¶1061

One CC to^{Mr. ABID HUSSAIN; Advocate [OPUC]}

¶1062

One CC to^{SRI SHIREEN SETHNA BARIA, Advocate [OPUC]}

¶1063

¶1064

I *#

¶1065

One CC to SRI^{RAVI CHANDRABEJJARAIVI, Advocate [OPUC]}

¶1066

One CC to SRI^{B. KRISHNA, Advocate} [OPUC]

¶1067

One CC to^SRI T.V.^{RAMESH, Advocate [OPUC]}

ftJ^{t*. cDcoPies}

i
P
!LS
I
i
I fir

I I fii ii tls

'; 1

i J t I .t t 1 tII

HIGH COURT

!li-i
rt
rl
I I;
I
i_
ti Hi
II
) fit,

¶1076

DATED:0310612024
r f EL4
C,
<br>k,
.$ +
C s f.o
,/\C)
s'
,.L
9r/citl*
COMMON ORDER

¶1077

i $

¶1078

i
W.P. Nos. 10224, 10216,5868, 11092, 1 1093, 11094,
$
11095, 11096, 11100, 11101, 11103, 11104,11105,
fl,11 106, 11107, 11 108, 12142, 12143, 12144, 12145,
rt,
'l
12146, 12147, 12148, 12149, 12150, 12151, 12152,
i
rlrltl 12153, 12154, 12155, 12156,',12157, 12159, 12160,
',
tl 14625,14627,14629 & 14630 0F 2021
ii E
tf
+
t i*s
t 7:
i.
I
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITIONSTHE WRIT PETITIONSWRIT PETITIONSPETITIONS
t\21 WITHOUT COSTSCOSTS
I
-l,l
t)rl
;J

¶1079

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITIONSTHE WRIT PETITIONSWRIT PETITIONSPETITIONS WITHOUT COSTSCOSTS

M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Ltd. v. Jikesh Kumar Mohanthy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Ltd. v. Jikesh Kumar Mohanthy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Smt. a. Kamala Devi Vs The State of Telangana

K. Narsaiah Vs Sri.Navin Mittal, IAS

Smt. K Anusha Vs Smt. S. D. Twinkle Joan

M/s. Tata Lockheed Martin Aerostructures Limited Vs Hemant a Pagare

Gorukanti Vinay Kumar Vs The Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Company Limited

Endapalli Mahendar Vs Disciplinary Authority and Chairman and Managing Director