This judgment dismisses a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The Court found the petitioner had passed away without legal heirs appearing, rendering the proceedings unnecessary.
The writ petition was dismissed for default without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
132171
HIGH COURT FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Oraginal Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
WRIT PETITION NO: 11475 OF 2002
Between:
Sthalam Gangadhar, Sio Sivudu, aged 29yeaq, Oc9: lx-Conductor, E.303212, R/oH,No.6-2-153, Khasba Sunhar Galli, Nirmal,Adilabad District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of theConstitutionof lndiaprayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled therewith, the High Court maybe pleased to issue any appropriate writ, order or direction,preferably a writ in the nature of certiorari calling for recordspertainingto order dt.4.08.2002 in 1.D.No.100 of 1996 on the file of chairmancum-presiding officer,lndustrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, GadavariKhani, publishedvideG.O.Rt,No.1968, dt.13.10.2002, Labour EmploymentTraining and Factories(Lab-l) Department and quash the same by declaringit as illegal, without jurisdiction, arbitraryand unconstitutional and directthe respondentsto reinstate petitioner into service with all consequential benefits.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRIMOHD GHOUSEUDDIN Counsel for the Respondent No.1:SRI GADAM SRINIVAS,SC FOR TSRTC Counsel for the Respondent No.2:GP FOR LABOUR
The Court made the following: ORDER
4 d
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N. TUKARAMJI
WRIT PETITION No. 11475 of 2OO2
ORDER:
This rvrit petition is filed seeking issuance of Writ of Certiorari calling for records pertaining to the orcler dated 04.08.2000 in t.D No.lOO of 1996 on the file of the ChairmancumPresiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal -cum. Labour Court, Godava:ikhani, published vide G.O.Rt.No.1968 , dated 13.10.2000, L,abour Employment Training and Factories (Lab-I) Departrnent and quash the same br. declar; ng it as illegal, without jurisdiction, arbitrary and unconstitutr onal and direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner int,c service with all conseqrrential benefits
c
petitioner has not taken any steps to come on record, keeping this petition pending on the hleis foundunnecessaly.
Miscellaneous applictrtions, pending ifany, shall stand
closed.. SD,-K, ASSISSREE TANTRAMAMU E TRARRTHY //TRUECOPY/' SE N OFFICER
BSR LS $
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1611012024
ORDER
1rr e SrAI€
(
'(
?z
c 29 i!i ?rj25
e
t
.t o
D ES 1 c6€
WP.No.11475 of 2002
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION
FOR DEFAULT,
WITHOUT COSTS @aP;q 8a4-l{"*
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for default due to non-appearance of the legal representatives.
Whether the Industrial Tribunal order directing reinstatement should be quashed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sthalam Gangadhar
The Depot Manager, APSRTC, Adilabad Depot
The Chairman, Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Godavari Khani
N. Tukaramji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
