Dismissed

Ch.Ram Reddy, Nizamabad District v. Mohd. Shabbir Ali, Nizamabad District and Another

Telangana HC5 Aug 2024MACMA/435/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana allowed the appellant's request to withdraw the Motor Accidents Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 435 of 2010, dismissing the appeal as withdrawn and closing pending miscellaneous petitions.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw the appeal; appeal dismissed as withdrawn; pending miscellaneous petitions closed.

Ch.Ram Reddy, Nizamabad District Vs Mohd. Shabbir… — Motor Accident Claims | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

[³²⁵¹ ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH^{COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶3

IVONDAY, THE^{FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST} TWO THOUSAND^{AND TWENTY FOUR}

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER}

¶6

MOTOR ACC IDENT^{CIVILMISCELLANEO US APPEALNO: 435 OF 2010}

¶7

AppealfiledUnderSectionlT3oftvlotorVehiclesActag-ainsttheorder.and a""re" i['O.p.No.439^{of ZO-OS-aat"O24-11-2OOg on the file of the Court of Motor} n"iiJ"ni. CtrirJftinrnul^{(Vlll Additional Dist Judge) at Nizamabad'}

¶8

Between:

¶9

Ch.Ram Reddv, S/o.^Ramaiah @^{Ram Reddy, TractorOwner R/oAnthampally}

¶10

Villige, Bhiknobr^{IVlandal,Nizamabad District'}

¶11

...APPellanUResPondent^No'1

¶12

AND

¶13

1 tMohd. Shabbir ali,^{Nizamabad District,S/o'Shaik lVleera Sab Poultry} - ii,iii.Lii ny". r-i+,^{aaroipooi vitrase,Dichpaly rVlandal,Nizamabad District.}

¶14

2 s.prakash^{Rao,s/o. sornaiah,aged majoro*n".."-, rr["il;;:";'":'''t""'} oiiurriii,^{Vitiage,Dichpally lVandal, Nizamabad District'}

¶15

...RespondenU2nd^{Respondentin the O'P}

¶16

l.A. NO:1 oF^{2010 (MACM AMP.NO:1203oF 2010)}

¶17

PetitionunderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed^{in supportof the petition,the High Court maybe pleased to stay} ult- frrtfl",^{proceedings in O.P.No.439 of 2005 dated 24-11-2009 passed by the} Motor Accidents^{claimsTribunal (Vlll Additional District Judge) at Nizamabad} pending disposal of the above^MACMA'

¶18

Counsel for the Appellants : Sri Ch'Janardhan^Reddy

¶19

: - - - Counsel for the ResPondents

¶20

The Court delivered^{the following: JUDGMENT}

¶21

¶22

THE^{HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K'SURENDER} No.4³⁵ OF o o10 M.A. c.M^.A.

¶23

JUDGMENT: ion^of 1. Learned^{counsel for the appellantseeks permrss} this^{Court to withdraw the APPeal'}

¶24

2 Permission^{is accorded'}

¶25

1S dismissed^{as withdrawn'} 3. AccordinglY'^{the APPeal} Miscellaneous^{Petitions'pendingif anY,sha1l stand closed}

¶26

ISMAIL sd/-^MOHD. REG^ISTRAR ASSISTANT

¶27

I/TRUE^COPYI/

¶28

SECTION^OFFICER

¶29

Dist^Judge)at Tribunal^{(VlllAdditional} To, Claims 1 The^{Motor Accidents} Advocate^[OPUCI 2 Xi:t"Jf^{t'' ch'Janardhan Reddy'} 3 Two^{CD Coptes}

Svs/gh

CH(L

HIGH COURT

DATED:0510812024

JUDGMENT

I
lHE S14 14:
e
i oc
1 3 t'l0\J 202{
.a /
I
SPATc qEC
r i..

¶37

MACMA.No.435 of 2010

¶38

DISMISSING THE MACMA AS WITHDRAWN

¶39

CAL
g,ltolh

Ch.Ram Reddy, Nizamabad District v. Mohd. Shabbir Ali, Nizamabad District and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ch.Ram Reddy, Nizamabad District v. Mohd. Shabbir Ali, Nizamabad District and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abdul Sattar , Bablu Vs the Managing Director and Another

Jampala Urmila Vs Md.Azeemuddin and Anr.

Sanjay @ Manik Rao Vs Kurbuzay Neelakant Rao

The United India Insurance Company Limited Vs Doulath Bee and 4 Ors.

N.Eswar Rao, Vs Thatipamula Raju, and Another

Ega Aruna Devi Vs Komuravelli Dayakar and Anr.