Dismissed

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Chillne Laxmi, And 3 Others

Telangana HC23 Aug 2024MACMA/3368/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana dismissed a Motor Accident Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed by an insurance company as it had been withdrawn by the appellant. Permission for withdrawal was accorded, and the appeal was held without costs.

What did the court decide?

Permission for withdrawal of appeal accorded; appeal dismissed as withdrawn without costs.

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Chillne… — Motor Accident Claims | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

[³²⁵³ ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶3

FRIDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE M.G.PRIYADARSINI

¶6

MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOU S APPEAL^{NO: 3368 OF 2019}

¶7

Appeal filed Under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles^{Act,1988 against the Award} and decree in M.V.O.P.No.42O of 2014 daled.OglO7l2o'l9^{on the file of the Court of} the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-^{| Additional District and SessionsJudge,} Medak at Sangareddy.

¶8

Between:

¶9

Bajaj Allianz General lnsurance Co. Ltd,^{rep.by. its, Manager, 608, 609' 6th} floor, 2nd Block, White House,^{Begumpet, Hyderabad.}

¶10

...AppellanU Respondent No.2

¶11

AND

¶12

1 Chillne Laxmi, W/o. Peddi Raju, Age^{41 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o.10-92,} S-N. Colony, Ramachandrapuram^{Village and Mandal, lvledak District.}

¶13

2 Chille Peddi Raju, S/o. Raja Rao,^Age 42^{years, Occ. Pvt. Wrok, Both areR/o.} 10-92, S.N. Col6ny, Ramathandrapuram Village^{and Mandal, Medak District.}

¶14

... ResPondents/Petitioners

¶15

3 K. Pratap Reddy, Sio. Not known, Age Major, Occ.^{Ownerof Crime Vehicle} No.AP-28V-3429, R/o.B H.No.3-58/1 Balanagar,^Hyderabad.

¶16

4 Deoavath Kishan, S/o. Dev Singh, age 30^years, Shalipalla^{Bata Tanda,} Rangampally Village, Pargi Mandal. Ranga^{Reddy District.}

¶17

...Respondents/Respondent Nos.1^{& 3}

¶18

lA NO: 1 OF 2019

¶19

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that^{in the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the^{High Court may be pleased to grant} stay of all further^proceedings in^pursuance of^{the award and the decree dated} gl7t2o19 passed in MVOP No.42O of 2O14 by the Motor Accidents claims Tribunal -cum- | Additional District and Sessions Judge, Medak^{at Sangareddy pending} disposal of the above appeal.

¶20

lA NrO: 1 OF 2023

¶21

BEIWEEN:

¶22

'l . Chillne Laxmi, Wo. Peddi Raju, Age 41 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o. 10-92, S.N. Colony, RamachandrapuramVillage and Mandal, Sangareddy District

¶23

Chille Peddi Raju, Sio. Raja Rao, Age 42 years, Occ. Pvt. Wrok, Both are Rl/o. 10-92, S.N. Colony, Ramachandrapuram Village and lvlandal, Sangareddy District( Old Medak District).

¶24

...Petitioners/Respondents No.1 & 2

¶25

AND

¶26

Bajaj Allianz General lnsurance Co. Ltd, rep. by its Manager, 608, 609, 6th floor, 2nd Block, White House, Begumpet, Hyderabad.

¶27

K. Pratap Reddy, S/o. Not known, Age Major, Occ. Owner of Crime Vehicle No.AP-28V-3429, R/o.B H.No.3-58/1 Balanagar, Hyderabad.

¶28

Degavath Kishan, S/o. Dev Singh, age 30 years, Shalipalla Bata Tanda, Rangampally Village, Pargi Mandal. Ranga Reddy District.

¶29

...Respondents /Respondents No.3 & 4

¶30

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the stay granted on 25-10-2019 in l.A.No. 1 of 2019 in tr/.A.C.tt/.A. No.3368 of 2019.

¶31

Counsel for the Appellant: Sri T Mahender Rao

¶32

Counsel for the RespondentNos.l & 2 : Sri Kiran Reddy Mallarapu

¶33

The Court delivered the following: Judgment

¶34

HON'BLE SMT.JUST ICE M.G.PRIYADARSINI

¶35

M.A.C.M.A.No.3368 OF 2019

¶36

JUDGMENT:

¶37

Aggrieved by the Award dated 09.O7 .2O L9 passed in M.V.O.P.No.42 O of 2014, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal- cum - I Additional District & Sessions Judge, Medak at Sangareddy, Respondent No.2 in the said MVOP preferred the present Appeal.

¶38

Learned Standing Counsel for Appellant/Insurance Company seeks permission to withdraw thc Appeal and also filed a letter before the Registry to that effect.

¶39

Permission as prayed lor is accorded

¶40

Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶41

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶42

¶43

sd/- T. JA REE ASSISTANT REG

//TRUE COPY//

To,

SECTION OFFICER

1 The Motor Accident craims Tribunar-cum- I Additionar District and Sessions Judge, Medak at Sangareddy(With records)

¶48

2 One CC to Sri T Mahender Rao, Advocate tOpUCl lne^{CCto Sri Kiran Reddy Mailarapu,Advocate} tOpUCl

¶49

4 Two CD Copies

ADK/gh

,@^

HIGH COURT

DATED:23lOBl2O24

JUDGMENT

MACMA.No.3368 of 2019

¶56

1Yr E S14
(
{. 'u
J q
)c [ 2 t:; 202t I
/
, !}rn1f,r" '

¶57

DISMISSING THE MACMA AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS

¶58

\1.t4
_)D

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Chillne Laxmi, And 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Chillne Laxmi, And 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kannapuram Saya Goud Vs Jhon George and Another

Avula Anjamma Vs Vasantha Laxmamma

Smt. Madavedi Gangu Bai Alias Magidi Gangu Bai and 2 others Vs Smt. Mahajani Mani (Dismissed for default wide C.O. dt. 20/2/15) and another

G.Vinod Kumar, Vs G. Allen

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Mandal Padmamma and 2 Ors.

Smt. Maria Vs G. Allen