The appellant insurance company challenged the Tribunal's award of compensation, arguing the driver was unauthorized and unlicensed. The High Court rejected these contentions, holding the insurance company liable, and dismissed the appeal.
Appeal dismissed; compensation to be paid as per Tribunal's decree.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY THE SECONDDAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENTYFOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEK.SURENDER
MOTOR ACCIDE NT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEALNO.1279 0F 2013
Appeal filed under Section173 ofM.V. Act, against the Judgmentand Decree dated.o2to4l2o13,passedin M.v.o.P.No.492l2O12 on the file of the court of the Motor Accidentclaims Tribunat-cum-ll Additional District & Sessrons Judge, (F.T.C ), Medak at Sangareddy.
Between
Bharathi AXA Generallnsuracne Company'Through its Manager,3rd Floor, o a-o-oole6. GokulTowr, Puniagutti,Hyd-2,A.P (Policy CoverNote No.30359521. valid from 16-08-2010to 15-08-2011)
. .ApPellanUR2
AND
... ResPondents/Petitioner&R1
IA NO: 1 OF 2013(MACMAMP. NO:3 165 0F 2013
Petition under section 151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed insupportof the petition, the High Court may be pleasedStay execution of the decree andall further proceedingspassed intvlVOP NO 49212012. DT 02 04.20130n the file of the MotorAccident claimsTrrbunal- cum-ll Addlk Dist &SessionsJudge, (FTC) Medak at Sanga Reddy
Counsel for the Appellant(s):SRl.N MOHAN KRISHNA
Counsel for the Respondents:Sri Palle Sriharinath
The Court made the following. Judgment
\
THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE K.SURENDER
M.A.C.M.A No.L279 0F 2013
JUDGMENT:
,TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
HIGH COURT
DArED 0210912024
JUDGMENT MACMA No 1279 ol 2013
-t HE STA 14:
) co 2 0 ilE\l zul zc
t r),: '11.;,'' '-()
\1. <sup>( .\r. \ ls l)ls\llssl l)
C(od4 ffox
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
MOT R ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1279 OF 2013
Between:
Bharathi AXA General lnsuracne Company, Through its Manager, 3rd Floor, 6-3566/86, Gokul Towr, Punjagutta, Hyd-2, A.P(Policy Cover Note No.30359521, valid from 16-08-2010 to 15-08-201 1)
...AppellanUR2
AND
Respondents/Petitioner&R'1
Appeal filed under Section'173 of M V. Act, against the Judgment and Decree dated.0210412013,passed in M V.O.P,No.492|2O12 on the file of the Court of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-ll Additional District & Sessions Judge, (F.T.C.), Medak at Sangareddy
ORDER:This appeal coming on for hearing and uponperusing thegrounds of appeal, thejudgment and Decree of lhe Lower Court aM the materialpapersin the case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri N.Mohan Krishna, Advocatefor the Appellants and of Sri Sri Palle Sriharinath for the Respondent.
This Court doth Order and Decree as follows:
Sd/- MOHD. ISMAIL ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
HIGH COURT
DAf ED:021O912024
DECREE MACMA.No.1279 of 2013
M.A.C,M.A. IS DISMISSED
G*re} ksx
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the insurance company is liable to pay compensation where the driver lacked authorization or valid license?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Bharathi AXA General Insurance Company
Sabavathi Buri Bai
Ravi Kumar Erpoti
K.SURENDER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
