Dismissed

M/s. Dakshin Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd. Kapil Towers v. Income Tax Officer

Telangana HC24 Sept 2024ITTA/117/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana allowed the withdrawal of Income Tax Tribunal Appeal No. 117 of 2024 filed by M/s. Dakshin Infrastructures against the Assistant Commissioner/Income Tax Appellate Tribunal order. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to raise the question of law at an appropriate stage.

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal of the appeal allowed; appeal dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to raise the question of law at an appropriate stage.

M/s. Dakshin Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd. Kapil Towers Vs Income… — Income Tax | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL AND

¶5

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO

¶6

INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 117 OF 2024

¶7

Appeal under Section 260 A of the rncome Tax Act, 1961 against order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'A' , Hyderabad in l.T.A. No.991/Hyd/2019 ( Assessment year 2010-11) dated 20-04-2023 preferred against the order in Appear No. 0482/2016-1zilTo, ward-7(1)/clr (A)-1l Hydi 2018-19 dated 28-03-2019 on the file the commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals) I, Hyderabad preferred against the order of the Deputy commissioner of lncome Tax circre 1 (2), Hyderabad dated 28-03-2013 in PAN/clR No AACCD413Bp

¶8

Between:

¶9

M/s. Dakshin lnfrastructures iyt ltg 1(apil Towers, Sy no. 1 15/1 , lT park, Nanakramglda, Srilingampally tr4andal. Ranga Reddy Disirict Represented bv its Managrng . Director vididhineni Naresh, s/o. Raiaia6 Aged abot.it 40 year, R/o. Hyderabad. ...AppeLt_Ar.ri/ n"spoia"rit

¶10

AND

¶11

lncome Tax officer, ward 17(1), Hyderabad gth Floor, signature Towers, Hyderabad

¶12

...RESPONDENT/ Appellant

¶13

Counsel for the Appellant: SRt M. NAGA DEEPAK

¶14

Counsel for the Respondent: None appeared

¶15

The Court made the following ORDER:

¶16

THE HONOURABLE SRI^{JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL}

¶17

AND

¶18

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^{NA]UAVARAPURAJESHWARRAO}

¶19

I.T.T.A.NO.117 0F 2024

¶20

JUDGMENT (per Hon'ble^SP,J)

¶21

Sri M.Naga Deepak,^{learned counsel for the appellant,} seeks to withdraw^{the Appeal and prays that the question of law} proposed may remain opened^{to be raisedat an appropriateslage'}

¶22

Prayer is allowed.

¶23

Accordingly, this^{Appeatis dismissed as u'ithdrawn with}

¶24

liberty prayed for. No^costs.

¶25

As a sequel, miscellarteous^{petitions pending, if aly, shall}

stand closed.

sd/'K sTt[t?+[tR

,-: ,/,

//TRUE COPY/'

sECTtoN^oFFlcER

The lncome^{Tax Appellate Tribunal'Hyderabad Bench'A' ' Hyderabad}

¶34

The Commissioner^{of lncomeTax (Appeals) 1' Hyderabad}

¶35

3 The Deputy^{Commissionerof lncomeTax Circle 1 (2)' Hyderabad} 4 One CC^{to SRI M' NAGADEEPAK' Advocate [OPUC]}

¶36

5 Two CD^CoPies

HIGH COURT

OATED:2410912024

JUDGMENT

ITTA.No.117 ot2024

-/-:=::-=-
;'/i;-,.;
ItrltlL
+ $
oo 2 7 rr[I 2U1 .F
o
:?
'-'. -I'rt-,,,,.r
\i--::: :,

¶42

DISMISSIGN THE I'I"TA^{AS WITHDRAWN.}

¶43

ct \DV<br>

M/s. Dakshin Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd. Kapil Towers v. Income Tax Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s. Dakshin Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd. Kapil Towers v. Income Tax Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arene Life Sciences Unit 3 Pvt. Ltd. Vs Assessment Unit

Ramesh Kumar Agarwal Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Dsn Films Private Limited Vs Income Tax Officer

The Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax-4 Vs M/s.Nsl Nagapatnam Power Ventures Private Limited

M/s. Sri Krishna Enterprise Vs Deputy Commissioner (State Tax)

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs PoluriSailaja